Essay On Preventing The War

1607-1776 also known as the colonial period is a time of new beginnings.When the colonists first moved from England to the new world, they were in search of freedom in every sense of the word. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and being free of the British tirade. They formed cities and towns while establishing their own laws. The issue that occurred is that while the colonists were away from Britain they weren’t away from British laws. In an effort to control and make money from the colonists Britain issued a series of tax acts which include the Stamp Act, the Sugar Act, and the Tea Act. All of which led to the colonists revolt against British reign. This new search for independence is what

One of the most important reasons the people wanted to break away from English rule was to not have to pay such a great amount for taxes. After the French Indian War or the Seven Years War, the English began to tax the colonist extremely high to pay off war dept. The English fought the war on the colonists’ land, so they believed that the colonist should have to pay for English’s war dept. The first set of taxes they placed on the colonist was the Sugar Act. The Sugar Act was passed in 1764, and it was a high tax on sugar. Another act passed was the Stamp Act, it was passed in 1765, and this stated that all paper would have a tax stamp on them. The next large tax was called the Townshend Act. It was passed in 1767, and this was a tax on every imported good that the colonist received. Every tax was raised to the max and the colonist were suffering because they could not afford the things they needed. This lead to revolt everywhere in the new world.

Though many laws were passed taxing the colonists, America had no say in the British Parliament. Patrick Henry’s speech embodies this argument when he says “We have no representatives in the British Parliament…… The Stamp Act is against the law. We must not obey it” (Doc. 1). This act of defiance caught the colonists’ attention and made them feel that perhaps they could change the laws after all. Another act of defiance against the British was the Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party was a riot against the British that involved colonists dumping tons of tea from British ships into the sea. Britain then passed a law that said that the Boston Harbor would be closed until the colonists paid for the tea. This angered the colonists even more, and eventually led to the Revolution. As you can see, many rebellious deeds inspired the colonists and helped them confront the British.

American colonists became angry with laws introduced by the British government in 1763-1776. Colonial resistance became more unified as Great Britain tried to tighten its rule of the colonies. The colonists thought of themselves as englishmen, and believed that they should not be taxed without consent. This caused the colonists to become angry against British rule. Two examples of taxes were the tea act, and the quartering act. The tea act caused fear because colonial merchants were in jeopardy of going out of business. The quartering act angered the colonists because Britain posted 10,000 soldiers on the proclamation line, and the colonists were forced to house and feed the soldiers without consent. These acts led to the revolutionary war.

They put a lot of taxes on household goods. They put taxes on anything they new colonists bought. The colonists didn’t like that there were taxes on everything. The colonists didn’t like the Stamp Act so much they started the Boston Tea Party.

The colonists were not allowed to send products to other countries or had to pay large tariffs to send them there so that England profited

They introduced The Coercive Acts that acted as a punishment for the colonists. The Coercive Acts broke into two parts, The Intolerable Acts and The Quebec Act. The Quebec Act gave the colonists the right to practice Roman Catholic Religion on their own free will (Brackemyre). The Intolerable Acts broke up into even more separate parts. The first of which was The Boston Port Bill. That closed all ports in and out of Boston until the tea that was thrown into the harbor was paid for. That was too expensive for the colonists to pay for, and if they did, then the British would still come out as the winners in the retaliation against this tax. The next piece of The Intolerable Acts was The Administration of Justice Act which stated that any British soldiers accused of murdering colonists were to be tried in England. This just about guaranteed that the British soldiers would be free of charges due to the colonists not having a place in the jury. The next act as part of The Intolerable Acts is The Massachusetts Government Act which took away the colonists right to elect representatives for the legislature. The King would be the one that would elect the representatives which would always end up being someone under the payroll of the King. This act also restricted all town hall meeting in the Colonies. The final punishment for the

Due to the taxation colonists faced against their will, they felt compelled to wage war and break away from Britain. Expensive taxes were often placed on materials the colonists frequently bought. The Stamp Act placed a tax on paper items in order to raise money for the British military, and the Sugar Act was put into place for Britain to gain revenue from the

The colonists were mad at the king because he forced them to fight in a war they did not want part it. During the war, which we had already been fighting, the king had impressed us into the British army and we were forced to leave behind our families and fight in the war. And when the war was finished, we were forced to pay for the war expenses through internal taxes. The king had not internally taxed us in over a century, so the taxes worsened the crack. In a time of peace, there were standing soldiers kept in the colonies, which lead to the Boston massacre. All these were made okay because of the acts in which Parliament passed. The quartering act forced us to provide housing and supplies to soldiers who began taking away the jobs in the colonies. The Stamp Act forced us to have to pay taxes on everything paper, including cards and dice. The tea act put excessive taxes on tea. All of these taxes were imposed soon after the war, which made the colonists upset. But what upset them even more was that they did not have anybody from the colonies elected into Parliament, making them feel like they were not represented the way they should be. The intolerable acts were also implemented, which threatened their self-government, so they fought back against Britain by creating the Continental Congress. After a few meetings of the Continental Congress, the colonies then decided to unite and declare independence from

On 1773 three years later from the boston tea party Lord North thought the Boston tea party went too far and king George agreed. So they put a new law into place that limited the colonists and what they could do. This happened because the colonists threw taxed tea into the harbor because it was taxation without representation.This helped start the develop the Revolutionary war.

This had greatly disappointed the colonist. So when the king put taxes on them, they were not happy. This problem also has a fancy term called ‘’taxation without representation’’. The colonists felt used by a government who did not represent them nor cared about their opinions. They felt like slaves to England. These bitter feelings got the colonist to the point of revolt. These sentiments can be realized by Patrick Henry’s quote “give me liberty or give me death!”. The colonist prepared a petition called the olive branch petition to stop the taxes, while also preparing for war. After the king declined their petition and promised to demolish all of the rebels, the colonies were fired up. There were many wars after that like the battle of bunker hill and the revolutionary war. Finally, on July 4 1776, the Americans got their freedom from the British.

The notion of an American way of war informs how scholars, policymakers, and strategists understand how Americans fight. A way of war—defined as a society’s cultural preferences for waging war—is not static. Change can occur as a result of important cultural events, often in the form of traumatic experiences or major social transformations. A way of war is therefore the malleable product of culturally significant past experiences. Reflecting several underlying cultural ideals, the current American way of war consists of three primary tenets—the desire for moral clarity, the primacy of technology, and the centrality of scientific management systems—which combine to create a preference for decisive, large-scale conventional wars with clear objectives and an aversion to morally ambiguous low-intensity conflicts that is relevant to planners because it helps them address American strategic vulnerabilities.

“War may sometimes be a necessary evil. But no matter how necessary, it is always an evil, never a good. We will not learn how to live together in peace by killing each other’s children. This famous quote is from James Earl “Jimmy” Carter, Jr., who served as the 39th President of the United States. It implies that war can be justified under strict circumstances where it can be necessary, but it is still abhorrent. War is defined as a state of armed conflict between different countries or different groups within a country. Justification refers to the action of showing something to be right or reasonable. War brings many negative and catastrophic impacts not just to the country, but to the people living in the country as well, which this paper

The Reason for Going to War Since the beginning of the war on Iraq, over 8243 civilians, 11000 Iraqi soldiers and 642 Coalition soldiers have died. There has not been one day since a US soldier was killed and since the beginning of the occupation, 39750 bombs have been dropped and $117 billion dollars have been spent. And no weapons of mass destruction have been found.

War has been a part of human culture since it's birth. It has led to a great many massacres and has shown us the evil that exists within the souls of humanity. Some have even gone as far as saying that war is human nature. To better understand the reasons behind war and how it affects others, I've examined several different societies and cultures so as to better understand the necessity of war and see the cause of their external war attitude. To do so, different variables from two topics (military institutions and external war attitude) were matched up and crossed so as to look into the answers to these questions. The variables were then calculated and through these graphs, I was able to find different societies in which