There are two ways to own your world: steal it, and own it. Although “The Inheritor” by Frank Roberts and “The Possibility of Evil” by Shirley Jackson are both very straight-forward stories, their details and words both hold deeper meanings. While both stories contain similar themes, they portray and tell them differently through the use of symbolism. In “The Inheritor,” the narrator fights for his life, and wins his world, but in “The Possibility of Evil” Miss Strangeworth steals hers from her neighbours. To begin, the possessions of the protagonists in both “The Possibility of Evil” by and “The Inheritor” symbolize who they are. Pride is a common characteristic in both stories. In “The Possibility of Evil” Miss Strangeworth states, “‘My grandmother planted these roses, and my mother tended them, just as I …show more content…
Miss Strangeworth’s roses are a symbol of her pride - they have been alive for as long as the source of her pride - the town - has been. Her roses are her “pride and joy”; when they are destroyed, so is her pride. In comparison, in “The Inheritor,” the ewe is an allusion to the Golden Fleece. In the myth of Jason and the Argonauts, the Golden Fleece solves all of their problems back home - the ultimate prize for hard work and near-death experiences. When the Inheritor refuses to leave behind his prize, the one thing he has on that island - he, too, has a “pride and joy” - it shows that it is the only thing he has left. But the difference between these symbols is what happens - one is destroyed, and the other is treasured. Furthermore, both characters “own” their respective worlds at some point. Miss Strangeworth’s house is on Pleasant Street, and it is the oldest one in town. She believes that the town sprung up around it, thereby making her the centre of her universe. This is a reference to how untouchable she believes she is, ruling the town from its
People’s personalities are not always what they seem. That is the case in Shirley Jackson’s short story “The Possibility of Evil.” The main character is an elderly woman who seems sweet and kind; however, she reveals that she is not sweet and kind. Miss Strangeworth’s character can be analyzed by considering what she does, what the narrator says about her, and how other characters interact with her.
The Story, The Possibility of Evil is a truly interesting story that demonstrates the evil of a community that seems almost perfect. This story demonstrates how there is probably no place on Earth that evil has not reached. The story bases itself on a small suburban town and the people that live there. The reader meets Miss Strangeworth who is a sweet little lady that smiles to everyone during the day and starts conversations, but by the time she gets home she starts writing letters revealing secrets and unpleasant facts of her neighbours and fellow townspeople and
People aren’t always who they seem to be. In ‘The Possibility of Evil,” by Shirley Jackson, this idea is explored in story form. One character, Miss Strangeworth, is the literary representation of this idea; She is polite and nice in person, but at the same time, she anonymously writes hurtful letters that spread false rumors to the whole town. Firstly, Miss Strangeworth’s character can be analyzed by considering what she says and does.
Miss Strangeworth family has loved there for better than a hundred years. Miss Strangeworth grandmother planted the roses and her mother tended them. She’s watched her town grow, and remembered when the river flooded out the shanties on the low road.
One of the oldest dilemmas in philosophy is also one of the greatest threats to Christian theology. The problem of evil simultaneously perplexes the world’s greatest minds and yet remains palpably close to the hearts of the most common people. If God is good, then why is there evil? The following essay describes the problem of evil in relation to God, examines Christian responses to the problem, and concludes the existence of God and the existence of evil are fully compatible.
First and foremost, the two authors have characters in their stories that represent some kind of evil. In “The Possibility of Evil”, Miss Strangeworth writes extremely rude and unconventional letters anonymously to many of the other townspeople. She is attempting to stop what she think could potentially evil. She herself is evil because she does not have to write her letters with a mean tone. She may be the main character, but she is still the antagonist. In “The Veldt”, the children of George and
A literary element the two short stories do not share is the type of characters Jackson uses. In “The Lottery” Tessie Hutchinson is a dynamic character who seems to change throughout the story.n For example, at the beginning she was happy and ready for the lottery to begin compared to the ending where she was against the lottery hoping for it to end and for everyone to start over. In “The Possibility of Evil” Miss Strangeworth is a round character who has
In “The Possibility of Evil,” Shirley Jackson gives us a character who seems to be the town's most respected and longest established resident, but who actually has a dark and destructive side. Her pride in the town may be the first foreshadowing clue of what she is truly like. Miss Strangeworth describes how her grandfather built the very first house on pleasant, street, and that she “.... family has lived here for better than a hundred years.” She even admits to thinking the town …. Belonged to her (Jackson 1). This evidence is important because it shows how Miss Strangeworth feels she is different, perhaps better than other townspeople. From
Evil can be categorized into two forms, moral evil and natural evil. Moral evil is brought about by bad choices that stem from our free will. Natural evil is bad things that happen to people, whether they deserve them or not. The problem with evil is,
Above all, in “The Possibility of Evil,” Jackson’s use of symbolism and irony allows her to unveil the dishonesty possessed by many people. Like Miss Strangeworth, her roses serve as a trademark of the town. And, similarly to the roses, although Miss Strangeworth seems pleasant, she possesses hidden thorns. When a dropped letter reveals Miss Strangeworth’s actions, her neighbors destroy her roses. “[Miss Strangeworth] began to cry silently . . . when she read the words: LOOK OUT AT WHAT USED TO BE YOUR ROSES”(Jackson 7). The destroyed roses represent Miss Strangeworth being exposed; there is no longer any pride or joy in the roses or Miss Strangeworth. Jackson’s use of symbolism throughout the story allows her to divulge the insincerity of everyday people. Throughout the story, Jackson also employs irony. Often, Miss Strangeworth engages in small talk with her neighbors while ironically consuming her time with cynical thoughts of the very
with some evil in it. Better? Why would God being so good and concerned about
The world is filled with many different words, some harder to define than other. One of these difficult words is considered by many to be evil. The definition of the word evil depends entirely upon the reader or writers perspective upon the word. The most innocent and simple ways that of would define evil is by simply saying that evil is the exact opposite of good, but what is good? In order to understand the true meaning of evil, we must first be able to describe what good is, what has goodness produced, and what has evil truly defied.
The problem of evil has been around since the beginning. How could God allow such suffering of his “chosen people”? God is supposedly all loving (omni-benevolent) and all powerful (omnipotent) and yet He allows His creations to live in a world of danger and pain. Two philosophers this class has discussed pertaining to this problem is B.C. Johnson and John Hick. Johnson provides the theists’ defense of God and he argues them. These include free will, moral urgency, the laws of nature, and God’s “higher morality”. Hick examines two types of theodicies – the Augustinian position and the Irenaeus position. These positions also deal with free will, virtue (or moral urgency), and the laws of nature. Johnson
The concept of morality plays an important role in human society. Through the discovery of what, exactly, determines that which is “good” and that which is “bad”, humans develop mechanisms that determine how they respond to or judge any given situation. What remains a mystery, however, is what, exactly, is the basis of morals. It is commonly believed that morals are learned through lived experiences, as well as, from those who act as each person’s individual caretaker(s). Even though these factors do play a significant role in determining morality, these factors alone neither create nor determine a person’s moral compass. In Paul Bloom’s work, Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil, we are introduced to the idea that morality, while partly learned, is something that is ingrained in humans from birth. Through multiple studies, performed both by Bloom as well as other psychologists, it is revealed that not only are babies able to perceive what is right and what is wrong, but also, from birth, babies are instilled with the innate knowledge of empathizing, valuing fairness and status, and valuing those who look similar versus those who look different. In spite of previous ideas, Bloom proves that babies are smarter than previously thought, while simultaneously recognizing the shortcomings of this “elementary” form of morality. Bloom’s finding prove to be revolutionary, in that they allow for the examination of different social structures, their shortcomings, and what
Everyday it is possible to read a newspaper, or turn on TV or radio news and learn about evil going on in our world. Banks are robbed, cars are stolen, violent murders and rapes are committed. Somewhere in the world the aftershock of an earthquake is being felt. Cancer is killing millions of people each year, while other debilitating conditions continue to affect many with no cure to end their suffering. President Bush said that our country is fighting a war against evil. We all agree that evil is real and cannot be ignored; the problem comes when we try and rationalize the concept of God and evil coexisting.