While Edmund Burke posits the sublime as a passive feeling elicited in the viewer in the presence of the superior powers of nature, William Wordsworth challenges this passivity by demonstrating the role of viewer participation and active imagination in the creation of the sublime experience, thereby reversing the power dynamic between man and nature, of which man is now in control.
Outline:
This essay examines the concept of viewer participation (or lack thereof) and by extension, the power dynamics between man and nature through Burke and Wordsworth’s work. Firstly, I will demonstrate Burke’s argument that the sublime is a passive feeling of the viewer through his emphasis on the sense of ‘sight’ in his discussion of the sublime as a way
…show more content…
Burke’s examination of all seven qualities of the sublime relates to sight: terror, power, vastness, infinity, succession and uniformity relates to what can be seen, while obscurity relates to what cannot be seen. In addition to the content of his writing, Burke’s use of language and diction, for example, with words and phrases like “[l]ook” (Burke 5) and “[w]ithout all doubt” (3) (which implies clarity) also reinforces the element of ‘sight’ in his text. For Burke, the power of the sublime object or landscape lies in its ability to overwhelm the viewer’s mental faculties and impose upon them feelings of the sublime. Here, the viewer is positioned as a subject upon which the sublime landscape impresses its image and sublimity, rather than one that is actively participating in the creation of this sublime experience. This passivity is highlighted by Burke who states that the sublime requires some form of mediation of “distance” (4) and remoteness. Following the explication of the observer’s passive role in the sublime experience, this essay will move on to affirm the subordinate …show more content…
By analysing the structure (shift from external to internal landscape), language (tenses, pronoun), and presentation of the experience of seeing the daffodils, I seek to demonstrate that feelings of the sublime are only evoked when the narrator’s imagination participates in the scene he has internalized in his memory. While the first three stanzas exemplify a merely physical stimulus and response mechanism to nature, the last stanza shows how active poetic imagination enables man to recreate and amplify emotions encountered, thus resulting in feelings of the sublime. Why does the observer not recognise the ‘wealth’ the scene brings in that moment? How does poetic imagination connect the physical eye and the inner eye to allow for sublime, transcendental experience? Hess argues that the poem “depend[s] for [its] power on the narrator’s ability to fix a single, discrete, visually defined moment of experience in his mind, to which he can later return in acts of private memory and imagination” (298). An example of the recapturing of emotions is seen where “gay” (I. 15) is recaptured as “pleasure” (I. 23) at the end. Active imagination, which draws inspiration from memory of the initial encounter, is now a permanent possession that
The memories in the poem maintain a cohesiveness and continuity of experience through repeated motifs such as the violets and the ‘whistling’. Memories also give us a recovered sense of life, as shown through the final line of the poem ‘faint scent of violets drifts in air’. This example of sensory imagery also creates a rhythmic drifting sense linked closely to the “stone-curlews call from Kedron Brook”. It echoes images of the speaker’s mind drifting into reflection and aurally creates transience between the present and the past.
The human tendency, described in the poem, is to foolishly “waste our powers” on material items rather than taking time to enjoy nature. Mankind is obsessed with “getting and spending” that we have become “out of tune” with the rest of the world to the point we do not anything of nature at all. The majority of the poem is a tribute to nature’s beauty so that others can experience it once industrialization consumes it. The past and memory are captured in Wordsworth’s poem through the experience of nature and its destruction from a first-person perspective. The concern of preserving the past to the Romantic poets it to pass on experiences of something beautiful that many do not take the time to see, and will soon cease to
The film uses the sublime in a way that grabs ahold of its viewers. In the film all of the elements that are linked to the sublime as described by Edmund Burke. First, the element of fear/terror is in constant play and is invoked by Goodman’s character, Howard, and into the other characters and the viewer,
Lastly, de Botton discusses the sublime in terms of its ability to call attention to the duality of pain and happiness. He includes several pictures in this chapter of vast landscapes that express the contrast of light and dark far more evidently than in other pictures throughout the book. The inclusion of these pictures serves to prompt the reader to recognize the stark contrast yet intimate relationship between light and dark. Likewise, De Botton’s description of the sublime is often in opposition to itself; he describes the sublime as “to do with feelings of weakness”, “threatening”, “can provoke anger and resentment” and “a defiance to man’s will” (de Botton 164).
Tracing the roots of this highly significant bond, however, if to adapt them in any historically meaningful way, would then require us to explore the central values that have resonated most, generally speaking. For Edmund Burke, a political philosopher who was noteworthy still for excursions into what’s dubbed “aesthetic theory,” and resulted in the foundation laid for some of the earliest discourse on the sublime, with its specified grounds in beauty and terror. To traverse this line, then, and possibly even indulging onto one side over another, is, as per Burke’s treatise, quite indicative of such a sublime experience, or, “it is productive of the strongest emotion which the mind is capable of feeling” (Burke 36). Unnecessarily that which
Percy Shelley opens his poem, “Mont Blanc” by noting how imperative the human mind is in regard to nature. The first few lines establish a relation that is essential to all life. With these lines alone, Shelley is pulling from many of the inclinations made by William Wordsworth in his poem, “Tintern Abbey”. There is however an expansion made on Wordsworth’s affections toward nature and its aweing power; while Shelley agrees that there is only a small amount of those who can truly grasp the full intention of what the natural world teaches, he largely finds nature in defiance with man’s own predilections and perceptions regarding its behavior and influence. “Mont Blanc” seeks out nature’s sublime instead of its lovely and simplistic benevolence. In some ways, “Mont Blanc” is a deeper examination and deconstruction of what “Tintern Abbey” constructs as a beautiful but surface level and thus shallow perception of what nature is capable of at its most powerful, and then asks how that influences the creative human mind.
The ascetic representation of the sublime throughout history has been in reference to grand or imposing landscapes and their relationship between humans and the Gods that created these landscapes. Throughout this paper, I have further investigated this overarching theory behind the ascetic sublime in hopes to deriving any similarities and differences to this theory throughout the evolution of art and philosophical ideologies. My research presents itself chronologically, so I begin with the sublime relations during the Renaissance period (15th – 16th century), this era then filters into the Baroque period the art of the sublime is considered a very pivotal assemblage in the artwork and philosophical ideologies that were expressed through various works during this time period. Lastly, I briefly delve into the Romanticism period, which does continue past the 1800s
Despite constant style and content changes within poetry throughout history, “God’s Grandeur,” by Gerard Manley Hopkins, is very comparable to the poem, “The World is too Much with Us,” by William Wordsworth. These poems’ greatest similarity lies in their themes. They each describe society and its lack of care for the natural world, where mankind is too preoccupied with duties and material things. The most obvious difference between the poems is the tone they end with—Hopkins’s poem starts with a sardonic tone and ends with a more positive stance towards nature and God by expressing a belief in renewal and redemption through the power of God. Wordsworth’s poem, inversely, remains cynical throughout and in the end the speaker wishes for his
One of the purposes that are displayed by Shelley’s particular writing style is the romanticizing of nature. This viewpoint is forced to be admired and spotlighted in human interactions as an example of a greater and bigger truth. “The immense mountains and precipices that overhung me on every side, the sound of the river raging among the rocks, and the dashing of the
Burke's sublime is separated into distinct categories. He categorizes objects of experience by the way in which they impact the senses. Burke associates qualities of "balance," "smoothness," "delicacy" and "color" with the beautiful, while he speaks of the sublime in terms such as "vastness" and "terror" (Burke, 325). Instead Kant dissevers the sublime into the mathematical and the dynamical, where in the mathematical aesthetical comprehension are not a consciousness of a mere more preponderant unit, but the notion of absolute greatness not inhibited with conceptions of constraints. The dynamically sublime is nature considered in an aesthetic judgment as might that has no ascendancy over us and an object can engender a fearfulness without
“The relationship between the energies of the inquiring mind that an intelligent reader brings to the poem and the poem’s refusal to yield a single comprehensive interpretation enacts vividly the everlasting intercourse between the human mind, with its instinct to organise and harmonise, and the baffling powers of the universe about it.”
William Wordsworth’s poetry was renowned for its connection to nature. As we learnt in class, his father became very ill when he traveled into nature and the
Percy’s noble task is to open our minds to the possibility that we are not the masters of what we know—that, in part, what we know and what we see, when approached passively, have a lot more to do with “preformed symbolic complex” than with ourselves (512). Percy’s exploration achieves one of the main goals of all philosophy—to change the way we think about things. He changes the meaning of many concepts human beings tend to take for granted. Sight is no longer the mere act of seeing, but “a struggle,” an act of understanding and appreciation (523). “Sovereignty,” in relation to things, is no longer some abstract concept of “power,” but an ability to interpret for oneself (517). Education—or perhaps more specifically, its dynamic—is reshaped, for it is no longer a passive act (i.e. “being taught to”) but an action that relies much more upon the student, who “may have the greatest difficulty in salvaging the creature itself from the educational package in which it is presented” (519). These concept-alterations are thus meant to alter our reality; they aim to help us rediscover in art what he calls in his opening paragraph an island, “Formosa.” This previously untouched island is beautiful to its discoverer
Wordsworth saw how the industrialization and the Age of Reason restrained nature and made society isolated from nature by giving importance to worldly possessions and material goods. To Wordsworth society solely concentrated on “…getting and spending,” (line 2) completely “…out of tune,” (line 8) with nature. Wordsworth passionately advocated against this consumer mentality and such was his vehement dissolution and discontent that he “rather be a Pagan suckled in a creed outworn” (line 10). This allusion to paganism, an outdated and primitive religion that saw everything in nature as being alive with souls, serves to highlight his great disappointment and discontent with society’s detachment and negligence of nature.
Edmund Burke (1729–1797) pioneered the development of the sublime as a concept in his “A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1756).” Burke identified the effects of beauty as an aesthetic pleasure. Sublime is different from beauty, he argued, because it provokes passion, fear, power, obscurity, pain, suddenness, and danger as effects. Burke pointed to specific components of the sublime such as vastness, infinity, and the magnitude of buildings. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), in analyzing Burke’s concept, argued that an object or phenomenon cannot be sublime. “The wide ocean disturbed by the storm cannot be sublime. Its aspect is horrible.” According to Kant,