Euthanasi Patient's Right To Die

Euthanasia refers to the intentional bringing about of the death of a patient, either by killing him/her, or by letting him/her die, for the patient's sake to prevent further pain or suffering from a terminal illness. Euthanasia is a complex issue in many underlying theological, sociological, moral, and legal aspects. Its legalization is heavily debated around the world, with strong arguments made for both sides of the issue. The supporters of euthanasia often repeated that "We have to respect the freedom of the patient" or "people should be able to exercise control over their own lives and death." However, Euthanasia, by nature, is "wrongfully killing" or "mercy killing", and if we allow any type of euthanasia, all sorts of negative

Euthanasia is generated towards very sick people with an incurable disease. But there are cases when people want total control over when and where they die. Euthanasia is usually conducted due to patients request but there are times when the patient is unresponsive or too sick to make that decision so then the decision is handed down to medics, immediate relatives and very occasionally the court.

Assisted suicide is an ethical topic that has sparked up many controversies. Individuals have heated disputes on whether or not patients who are suffering should have the right to die. Some worry that legalizing euthanasia is irrational and would violate some religions, while others argue that it provides a peaceful death towards terminally ill patients who are suffering from pain. Physician-assisted suicide is a contentious matter, in which there are many positive and negative aspects, whether or not it should be committed is a complex decision.

To fully understand the issue at hand, one must understand the various forms of euthanasia. The Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary: Tenth Edition defines euthanasia as “the act or practice of killing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals…in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.” Euthanasia can be either passive or active. Passive euthanasia occurs when a patient is relieved of medical treatment and is allowed to die naturally. Active euthanasia occurs when either a physician or a family member actively takes the life of the patient, perhaps through lethal injection, and eliminates a natural death process. Many people commonly use the word “euthanasia” to refer to assisted suicide. Essentially, assisted suicide is a form of active euthanasia in that a person, usually a physician, aids in the suicide of a patient.

The word euthanasia, when translated, means "good death." Physician- assisted suicide is a fast, painless death that every terminally-ill person should have the liberty to choose. Euthanasia is not a drawn out process like many terminally-ill patients have to deal with. However most people want to die at home in peace and euthanasia gives people this right. The author indicates that more than half of Americans die in the hospital and that is a sad occurrence (Kim 171). PAS and euthanasia allows patients freedom from physical pain and emotional suffering. According to Willke, proponents of euthanasia are quick to accuse doctors of not letting a patient die in peace (1). The author states there are two different definitions for euthanasia. First voluntary active euthanasia is intentionally administering medications to cause the patient's death at the

If someone has a life threating disease and wishes death, it should be granted to them. The prolonging of the suffering of dying patients is an unethical practice that should be stopped. Euthanasia as of today in the majority of states is illegal. My opinion on Euthanasia is that it should be legalized because the patients get to die with dignity, on their own terms

Euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide has been widely talked about. While there are many pros and cons to the issue, I think it’s best to look at it as a subjective relativist. Every case is different and should be treated as such. What might work for some won’t necessarily work for others. I generally believe that the option should be open with some exceptions. I will be using both terms interchangeably, however it is important to note that Euthanasia is when a doctor directly kills the patient, while physician-assisted suicide is when the doctor prescribes drugs that the patient chooses to take on their own. I find both morally equivalent.

Euthanasia and doctor assisted suicide are similar but not exactly the same. Many people mistake them as synonyms, however, their meanings differ slightly. Euthanasia or rather a “mercy killing”, refers to when a patient is painlessly killed directly by the doctor, most commonly using a lethal injection, as a method to end their suffering. Doctor assisted suicide refers to when a doctor provides a way for the patient to kill themselves, likely using a prescription of some sort. It is most common in those who are either elderly, suffering from a terminal illness, an irreversible coma, or suffering from an incurable mental disability. Legalization of euthanasia would be significantly beneficial to patients who are suffering and need a last resort

Many legal, ethical and personal issues and dilemmas have been identified in relation to physician- assisted suicide and euthanasia. Issues such as whether physician- assisted suicide or euthanasia is ethically acceptable, or what criterion is legally and socially necessary to determine whether a person can receive assisted suicide measures to end ones life. A variety of literature reviews have been created to address this topic and generate knowledge and information for health care professionals. With this in mind, there are many phrases associated and utilized synonymously with the term physician- assisted suicide that need to be addressed such as physician- assisted death, euthanasia, and aid in dying, however each has been defined separately throughout the literature. Westefeld et al., (2013) and Landry, Foreman and Kekewich (2015) define physician- assisted death as voluntary termination of life through the administration, from the person requesting termination, of a lethal dose to end ones life. The Canadian Medical Association (2014) refers to euthanasia as “the practice of knowingly and intentionally performing an act with or without consent, that is explicitly intended to end another person life” (p. 2) by a physician. Lastly, aid is dying is the request of a prescription for medication; provided by a physician, that patients can self-administer to end ones life peacefully (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2013). For

People have different perspectives and views on Euthanasia or Physician-assisted suicide and how they should or should not be legal. In some cases people feel as if the patient who are suffering from a terminal painful disease should have the right to commit suicide in other cases people feel as if the patient is being selfish to end their life when you have loved ones that are going to suffer because they killed themselves. People feel it should or should not be legal because of right to die, living wills, and Hippocratic Oath.

On November 1, 2014 Californian resident, the 29 year-old Brittany Maynard died. What was so special about her, many may ask. Brittany death was not like any other death, she made the decision to end her life after been diagnose with a terminal brain cancer. Knowing her fate was seal, she decided to move to Oregon which was one of the state that enable in 1997 the “Death with Dignity Act”, to die with dignity. Brittany did not want to subject herself and her family to purposeless prolong pain and suffering at the hand of an incurable disease. (John)

Medical News today classifies Euthanasia as "assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide (dying) , doctor-assisted dying (suicide) , and more loosely termedmercy killing". Regardless of what anyone says the idea behind Euthanasia is to end someone's suffering, and this is specifically done by a physician or those in a caregivers role. Ending of the suffering is only done when the person's life is ended and typically it would be done in a manner that is not adding more to the individuals current state of suffering.

Euthanasia it is something that can be controversial with many religious group or other people who don’t believe in assisted suicide. Some say that it is a crime to help with assisted suicide and should be illegalized. With regard to Euthanasia, I believe that doctors should be able to help their patience in accosted suicide in only major cases. Such as if a patience has a terminal disease, it is in the Hippocratic Oath of doctors, it doesn’t make life shorter for the person who takes the path of euthanasia, and that it is optional it is not required if you have a terminal disease.

According to Webster’s Dictionary, Euthanasia is “conceding painless death to a patient who is considered to be hopelessly ill, because of a non-curable disease”. The term is used to refer to the act of deliberately taking the life of a sick person, especially those who are sick from terminal illnesses. Patients in this category are normally those who are nearing their death from a persistent terminal illness and medicine does not to have much effect on them. Different scholars hold different opinions on whether to legalize the practice. Some stage a very strong that attempt to justify euthanasia. They argue that it is a common practice in the US and that it serves to end a person’s suffering and save the family members a lot of emotional

First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone’s life in a painless way. It seems pretty simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society in general as well.