Evaluating Bias in Research Extending human knowledge in research can be challenging when an individual don’t have no systems to go by. In planning a research's design, sociologists use various of different formulas to help students analyze and understand the steps they will need to collect data. Studies have shown when investigating scientific merits, it is critical to think about bias. Even though, the quality of research topics or questions that can be asked are researchable, many of them can be endless. However, unless you grasp how to frame your question properly, by following the first stage in the student's guide to research, you will master the formula of how to proceed. The first stage to the student's guide research is frame …show more content…
As the saying goes, "don’t believe everything you read." Just because scientific findings are written doesn't make them necessarily true. It is very important for researchers to remember the main goals of the study is evaluating the quality of research summary. Many scientific disciplines, especially the social sciences, face a long battle to prove that their findings represent the wider population in real world situations (Shuttleworth, 2009). Most studies conclude that we lack generalization in the drug industry settings where more early stage members are highly absorbed to new drugs, which can be poorly absorbed to candidates because they vary so widely. All generalizations are based up on reality or conclusion, however, not all conclusion are generalizations. If logical reasoning can be so easily lead researchers are most likely to mistakenly investigate characteristics as purpose, this action leads to incorrect conclusion. An example of logical reasoning would be to argue that drugs are morally wrong, like any drug, they can cause serious side effects, allergic reaction, overdose, and even death. Another experimenter bias that can affect the medicine research development is gender identity and gender role. This suggests that not only do women react differently to some drugs than men, they might also …show more content…
T., Krauth, D., & Bero, L. (2015). Industry sponsorship and publication bias among animal studies evaluating the effects of statins on atherosclerosis and bone outcomes: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0008-z Chambliss, W. & Eglitis, D. (2016). Discover Sociology: Second Edition. Arlington, TX. SAGE Publisher Inc. Harron, K., Wade, A., Gilbert, R., Muller-Pebody, B., & Goldstein, H. (2014). Evaluating bias due to data linkage error in electronic healthcare records. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 1436. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-36 Lloyd, K. (October 15, 2015). Broadly. Why Molly May Be More Dangerous and Deadly If You're a Woman. Retrieved from https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/why-ecstasy-may-be-more-dangerous-and-deadly-if-youre-a-woman Shuttleworth, M (August 07, 2009). Explorable. External: Validity. Retrieved from https://explorable.com/external-validity Whoriskey, P. (November 24, 2012). Washington Post. Business: As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias. Retrieved from
Henslin, J. (2011). Essentials of Sociology: A Down To Earth Approach. Boston, MA: Allyn &
According to the course syllabus we were introduced to the techniques of psychological research. This course was able to provide an understanding of how research is done, and what methods we can use to do so. By having a clear understanding of research and techniques used, it allows us to communicate effectively in regards to ideas behind the research process. In this paper, I will use myself as the case study to examine exactly what I learned about research.
(Schaefer R 2011 Sociology: A Brief Introduction)Schaefer, R. (2011). _Sociology: A Brief Introduction_. (9th ed) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Within this assignment there will be a clear demonstration and understanding of the concept of research in relation to the acquisition of underpinning knowledge appropriate to my programme of study. I will also be undertaking a comparative analysis of the nature and validity of quantitative and qualitative research methods. I will also be demonstrating skills in critical analysis of methods of data collection and selection of appropriate methods to informing future working practice. I will also be analyse the ethical considerations in relation to the development and undertaking of research.
Browne, K. (2008) Sociology for AS AQA 3rd Edition, Cambridge, Polity Press, pg 176/ 172/ 177
Henslin, J.M. (2010). Sociology: A down-to-earth approach (4th ed.). . Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Facts are statements that are indisputably true. Truthful statements are authentic because they are widely accepted to be accurate and fit reality. When answering the question “given access to the same facts , how is it possible that there can be disagreements between experts in a discipline?”, one must consider the definition of an expert. For the sake of this paper I am defining an expert as someone who excels in their field , and constantly evolves their knowledge as their field progresses. I believe that disagreements between experts when presented with the same facts, occur because of bias. Bias is a sway towards one side or view of a situation or statement. Therefore I ask , how does someone’s personal bias affect their interpretation
I earned my LCSW-R while coordinating independent living skills for males aging out of foster care in New York City. I am supervising Social Work interns for Clinical Placement for the last 15 years. My academic goals are to complete the PHD DSW Online Program, develop professional knowledge, cognitive theories of human behavior, preventive and intervention, in-depth understanding of social systems, theories, and an effective construction as I conduct un-bias research. As a pastor and clinical therapist with a private practice for the last 18 years, I believe it is time to take my professional experience to the next level. The anticipated goal is to open a Community Center and out-reach ministry, which will provide resources with the targeted
The social sciences are a relatively new branch of science and with this youth comes complexities and growing pains. The evolution from looking strictly at history, to applying natural science research methods to the stratified version of research methods now utilized in the social sciences has progressed organically over time. This is a very interesting phenomenon since the founding fathers oscillated between history, the present-day’s ethnographic research as well as the views of their contemporaries. This leads one to ask if the time period in which sociology came about lead to its birth? Or were these founding fathers generally interested in the social ties that bind us together? I believe it is a combination of both that
Bibliography PageJames M Henslin. Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach, Core Concepts (3rd Edition). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2008.
Henslin, J, Possamai, A & Possamai-Inesedy, A 2011, Sociology: A down-to-earth approach, Pearson, Frenchs Forest NSW.
For example, Vedula (2012) notes that FDA guidelines state pharmaceutical companies can use peer-reviewed articles to publicize evidence of a drug’s effectiveness for off-label uses, as long as a number of conditions are met—perhaps the most essential of which is that “the information disseminated must not be false or misleading.” However, Vedula continues, there is no unyielding regulation that all research findings have to be published. Therefore, a company can still choose to selectively disseminate favorable findings. His article concludes that there is now a copious amount of evidence that suggests selective reporting of study results, based on the strength and direction of findings, is performed extensively by the pharmaceutical industry.
Kendall, Diane, Jane Lothian Murray, Rick Linden. Sociology in Our Times. Scarborough, Ontario: Thomson Canada Limited, 2004.
Van Krieken R, Smith P, Habibis D, Mcdonald K, Haralambos M, Holborn M, Sociology Themes and Perspe
Tischler, Henry L. Introduction to Sociology, 8th Edition. Forth Worth, Texas.: The Harcourt Press, 2002.