Evidence Of Prior Criminal Evidence: Case Study

I feel that this case was somewhat representative of what was discussed in the textbook. The forensics aspects of this case were generally different from the impression of forensics I received from reading the textbook. Despite this fact, I feel that the investigative techniques of this case were similar to what was discussed in the textbook, as well as what has been discussed during lecture.

Nearly anyone you ask would be familiar with the television show CSI. The crime lab is colorful and high-tech with all of the fun toys and machines that analysts use to test the ever abundant amount of forensic evidence from every crime scene. It makes for an exciting drama that you cannot help but get immersed in—it also gives us a false illusion, however, creating what has been dubbed as the “CSI effect” (Baskin, 2011). This effect describes the idea that crime shows such as CSI generate unreal expectations, making viewers believe that forensic evidence should be existent in all criminal trials, therefore affecting their overall perspective on a case (Baskin, 2011). But in reality, forensic labs are not that glamorous. In fact, the

I am interested in the Criminal Defense Investigator’s position that was presented on the U.S. Courts website. Enclosed you will observe a copy of my resume. I have been employed by the State of Maryland for 13 years in which 7 years I’ve worked with The Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Parole and Probation’s Drinking Driver Monitor Program as a Monitor II. I am a highly motivated and skilled probation officer who graciously handles and resolves challenging probationer’s issues. I am driven to consistently provide exceptional support to the individuals that are under my supervision.

Some individuals do not trust the evidence collection process and may feel that law enforcement professions may often manipulate evidence to get their desired results for a trial or conviction. The evidence goes through safeguards to help prevent the evidence from being manipulated, but there are opportunities to manipulate evidence or to alter the evidence in the collection process to benefit an individual’s agenda during the trial process. I will identify some areas where a corrupt investigator would be able to alter evidence.

3. The role of the prosecutor is to decide which evidence should be presented and which is the best way to present it. Evidence is chosen based on what is best fitted to present the case and helps to build towards a guilty verdict against the offender. Judges give the final stamp of approval on all evidence presented in a case. They are given power to either admit or omit evidence based on prosecutorial or defense objects which will require interpretation of the law. The jury’s duty is to review and interpret the evidence in order to find the truth within it. During criminal trials they are meant to decide if the evidence can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

arrive to a scene to the moment a verdict is decided upon the offender, the way in which crime

The Supreme Court of Canada fails to take a consistent and principled approach to criminal procedure cases. Assessing the constitutionality of legislation is an important function of the Supreme Court of Canada. Consequently, consistent and principled approaches are expected and required in the interest of fairness and upholding judicial legitimacy. The judiciary’s role in protecting individual rights from state interference is a core judicial function, particularly in criminal procedure cases. “The duty to protect individual rights lies at the core of the judiciary’s role, a role which takes on increased significance in the criminal law where the vast resources of the state and very often the weight of public opinion are stacked against the

Now, having officially hit our half way mark in forensics, I have come to the realization that we were able to accomplish a lot this year, but I personally wish that I could have managed my time better this semester. We were able to work in pairs and research the history regarding the origin of forensics and how it has evolved to be the field that it is today. We were also able to explore more in depth about certain parts of the field, like for instance one of the first labs that we did was the hair analysis. In this lab we were able to see that there are certain characteristics of a hair strand that can help differentiate the typed of species from which the hair strand comes from. Not only that, but from this lab we learned that DNA can be collected from a strand of hair if and only if the root is present. From here

The outcome of many criminal law cases will depend upon the strength and admissibility of evidence. Some evidence is “Admissible, Suppressed, Hearsay, and Scientific and Forensic Evidence.” (findlaw) Admissible evidence has to be relate to crime taking place which can either prove or not prove. (findlaw) Suppressed evidence is evidence that has been obtained in a legal way that a judge is to turn down. It can also be when a prosecutor hid the evidence when all of it is needed for the defense. This will violate the 5th amendment.(Hill). Some people may think that the evidence is to much and that it will hurt someone more than help them, but that’s wrong it helps you if you haven’t done anything bad. Hearsay evidence is coming from a 3rd view perspective. (findlaw) An example would be, Me and my neighbor were walking down the street and our friends comes running by us and she tells us that a robbery was taking place. She says that she was held at beyond her will. So after that if the police need us to testify something like that would be said. When your court you just have to simply explain the truth from what you would were told. Through Scientific and forensic it can also form, “Blood Spatter Analysis, Ballistics, Gunshot Residue Analysis, Fingerprints, DNA Analysis.” (Kaman). Theses all come from a crime scene from whatever crime was

LaMar startled. “These look interesting, Doctor.” Ms. Smith, his office administrator, laid three drab folders on his desk.

Good determination on how the prosecutor should agues this case. I concur with you, just like parents teacher have an all-around job, and they are to teach the children, provide counseling and good wellbeing. Mrs. Betz was in her rights to alert the principle about Jacob’s behavior. Mrs. Betz might have save other student and parent from the stress of having to deal with their children getting caught up in drug activities. Jacob was wrong and his action and decision making was incorrect, Mrs. Betz made a good decision that day. Jacob need to be a lot more responsible with his choices in

Prosecutor: The prosecutor continues to research the case. He/she is responsible for convincing the judge that the suspect is guilty, and must do so using evidence and testimony (Stearns, October 9, 2017). The prosecutor will interview witnesses and look at evidence collected from the crime scene. They also study past cases and review applicable statutes to ensure that they proceed in accordance with the law (Siegel & Worrall, 2017).

Evidence is an integral detail in any legal case, evidence is what determines the length of sentence and evidence is what sways any jury. But can the presumable presented documentation be completely trusted in all cases? Misrepresented facts are common in the courtroom as well as in the world. No revision within the criminal justice system, and the lack of strict procedures and high standards are producing an arena for faulty facts. It is essential that the judicial system develop a more trustworthy protocol for evidence and that the community keeps informed.

There are many physical evidences that can result in the success or failure of a criminal procedure. One of the many of the effectiveness of a criminal procedure is if someone has a committed crime and decided to change their identity, they could still be identified, thanks to Alphonse Bertillion, who created the first scientific system of personal identification. When this system first came out it had many problems, because it was measuring the length of a person’s head, arms, legs, and etc. Another procedure that can determine the success of a criminal procedure is using photography. Using photographs of a crime scene helps record and examine the physical evidence before anything is moved and cleaned up. While in the court, these photos can

Evidence is collected and constructed to make a case. Evidence can provide detailed information about the event. Police and investigators rely on evidence to uncover the truth. Evidence helps identify the guilt or innocence of a offenders. There are many type of evidence that can be admitted at a trial like testimony, direct evidence and others to help the case. In the passage “Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the most important type of evidence is the most important type of evidence to be presented at a trial.