preview

Examining Evidence Based Practice For Patients With Chest Pain

Decent Essays

The important arguments for the need to implement evidence-based practice (EBP) are that it leads to the highest quality of care and the best patient outcome (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011). It is the standard of practice for nurses to be able to use research skills for evidence-based knowledge that are relevant to their clinical practice. The purpose of this paper is to outline and compare the selected articles on how the study findings related to patients with chest pain, to determine the validity and reliability of the selected articles, and to formulate a plan for implementing the newly acquired knowledge into clinical practice. Selected Articles to the Phenomenon of Interest Chest pain is a common complaint in all health care setting. The cause can be from mild self-limiting musculoskeletal disorder to life-threatening condition like acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Approximately 24.5 to 49.8% of patients with chest pain have chest wall syndrome, and only 1.5 to 3.6% of patients have ACS that need immediate interventions (Haasenritter et al., 2015). Therefore, the selected meta-analysis articles will be focus on the most common cause of chest pain the musculoskeletal pain, (Croft, Peat, & van-der-Windt, 2010), and the most serious cause of chest pain, the ACS (Abbas, 2015). Brief summaries of the selected quantitative and qualitative articles appear in the Appendix. The cause of pain can be puzzling and is not always related to specific pathology (Croft et al.,

Get Access