One absolute similarity with these two articles covering the executive branch on the presidential power both claim that President Bush and President Obama use of their powers for their own advantage, or at a higher extent of what they are given in Article II of the Constitution. In my opinion, the power of the U.S. president should not be lessened for presidents later on down the line. Congress allows a lawless executive branch- or lose authority as is, if more was added restricting the president to his constitutional powers, is there a point to a president? In the article Obama is not a Monarch, Ted Cruz explains the president’s executive amnesty; calling it a lawless executive branch. As well as in the article The Founders’ Great Mistake by Steve …show more content…
The constitution was created to implicate a system of checks and balances for the nation, and the president ruling executive amnesty for immigrants, is an illegal unilateral dictating from the White House; which would completely underline the rule of law. Not to mention, Article II of the Constitution makes sure the presidential power to be respected, “if the president won’t respect the people, congress must,” says Ted Cruz. Furthermore, no ambiguity; disputes between Obama and the American people, as conflicts continued democrats suffered during midterm election losing seats due to the prospect of executive amnesty. If the president wants change in the law, he must compromise with congress; it is a requirement within the law of the Constitution. Congress holds the position as a representative for the people, they must use every tool available to prevent presidents from subverting the law.
The executive branch of the Unites States government consists of the President, Vice President, Executive Office of the President (EOP), and the Cabinet (Citation). The President is the highest official of the Executive branch. The powers of the President are wide-ranging and highly substantial but were also drafted in the constitution to be limited by the other two branches of government. The remaining branches of government are the Legislative branch and the Judicial branch. There functions of all the branches are interrelated and the restraints on the amount of power each reserves are also coordinated. This correlation involves the system of checks and balances which was implemented by the framers of the Constitution. The President, as
That’s right congress seems to have a grudge of sorts on the executive branch. This could be from a number of things, it could be that they see the president as some annoying co-worker that just deleted their last months project, every time the president vetos. We all know this must be frusterating be cause im sure we have all been in their place. And if congress breathing down his neck wasnt bad enough, one of the only checks that the executive branch has can be overridden. That means that the thing that is supposed to stope legislation from passing can be passed. Which isn’t tha tbad of a thing because if congress passes legislation which means there is aleady a majority. So when one man says no and then even more men say yes i think we can all see where the real preoblem
Oliver Ellsworth, an important American lawyer and politician that lived during the first American Independence day, states his opinion on a new American Congress, “The powers of congress must be defined, but their means must be adequate to the purposes of their constitution. It is possible there may be abuses and misapplications; still, it is better to hazard something than to hazard at all”. In the original United States Constitution, the Framers wanted to make three different and equal branches of government, but today that is not the case. In present day government, Congress is more powerful than the President. The Legislative Branch, or Congress, is the second branch of the United States Federal Government. Congress is made up of two houses called the Senate and the House of Representatives. The main purpose of
There are many debates concerning which branch of government is more powerful. I honestly thought the executive branch was the least powerful of all three, but James Wilson lists a lot of reasons to think otherwise. The argument that the President and the Executive branch is the most powerful is still up in the air, but there are three strong reasons why the President and Executive branch is the most powerful at the moment.
My thoughts about the power between Congress and The Presidency I think it’s all about balance. We look to Congress and The Supreme Court to lead our government and The President to be the head of our country to make hard decisions that sometimes lead our country into war. With that said neither one at the same time should have too much power we don’t want a dictatorship and our constitution was made to give the President the freedom to be great leaders. It's all about balance and doing what’s best for our country with both Congress and The
The system of Checks and Balances is broken in many ways. For instance the President had the power to make executive orders that aren’t laws but have the power of one. The president has the power to make an order and an example is order number 9066 which stated, “Presidential order signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt, which authorized the
A power that the executive branch has over the legislative branch is that the president, executive branch, can veto any laws that the congress, legislative branch, may try to pass.
However, if the President had to only stick by what was said in the Constitution, the position would be very weak, which is not the case today. The Constitution states that the President can make treaties if two-thirds of the Senate agrees, appoint members, give Congress suggestions, and be the Commander In Chief, but that was not solely the Founding Father’s intentions. According to Chief Justice Marshall,
However, some ways the president’s power gets limited includes needing the approval of the Senate for treaties and appointing government officials, not being able to officially declare war, and not being able to make any laws as their own opinion unless they make an executive order. The Constitution gave these powers to the president so the executive branch limits what the Congress can do. For example, if the president does not gain the veto law power, the Congress would force the president to sign all laws passed by the Congress. As a result, the Congress would be similar to the British monarch when they tightened control over the 13 colonies, making laws that only benefits themselves. Article 2 section 2 lists the powers of the president, and how the president gets limited on
The Constitution grants the U.S. President ample power regarding almost every aspect of governing the nation; yet, it grants him none directed specifically at immigration policies. In fact, the Constitution was silent on immigration altogether. “None of the congressional powers [in the Constitution] explicitly mentions immigration… [which] led some to suggest that immigration was left exclusively to state control. However, the Founders gave primary control over foreign affairs to the federal government, and immigration was an important aspect of foreign affairs in the eighteenth century” (source 7). Therefore, Congress claims sole power over making immigration policy. Consequently, presidents utilize their powers that seem unrelated to immigration to gain control over it. To this end, most presidents use executive orders to defer deportation or expedite the process for green cards. Presidents also use executive pardons to pardon illegal immigrants from any punishment dictated by law (Article 2, Section 2). Thirdly, presidents use appointment powers to create agencies to address immigration issues. Presidents can also propose legislation to Congress to grant amnesty or
Article II of the constitution outlines the powers of the president, however, the checks and balances of the other branches of government limit them. After the 1960s, historians argued that the presidential power had become extremely powerful that an “imperial presidency” existed (Lamb, 2015). This has caused an imbalance in power within the legislative branch, giving more control to the presidency. “Congress has been taking themselves out of the game for several decades now” (Kamark, 2013). At this rate, the checks and balances of the branches of government will be thrown out of proportion, thus making it suitable for the House of Representatives to make a lawsuit against the president’s executive orders. Originally, executive orders and
objectives were to establish a federal government, and to outline an equal distribution of powers within our government.(Michelsen, 2010). It was implemented by creating three branches that had to coincide with each other to function. Each branch has its own powers, duties, and responsibilities that influence how the government works. Executive Branch, which pertains to executing the laws. The legislative, which creates the laws and the judicial which interprets the laws. The constitution states their powers and their checks on one another, and its obvious that the legislative has the most power over all the other branches.
The president of the United States is the head of the executive branch. There are one hundred U.S. senators. We elect president for four years. If the president can no longer serve, vice president becomes president. The president vetoes bills. The two major political parties of the United States are democrats and republicans. Citizens need to be eighteen or above to vote. The declaration of independence was adapted on July 4, 1976. The economic system in America is capitalist economy and market economy. The idea of self-government in the first three words is “we the people”. We elect Senators to serve for six years. Speaker of the house becomes president if the President and Vice President can
Presidential power has increased immensely over recent years and little is being done in an attempt to restore the original intent of the Constitution. There are multiple factors that affect this, including the executive orders of presidents, the Constitution giving an unequal distribution of power between the executive and legislative branch, the failure to use checks and balances, and the ineffectiveness of Congress. With the lack of congressional involvement in legislative decisions, the president has the ability to take matters in their own hands.
The limits of power on the executive branch are continuously growing and expanding, because presidents have continued to push the boundaries to accomplish their own goals for the nation.