Research Question:
How students choose a post-secondary school?
Review of Literature:
Many factors influence the choosing of a post-secondary school. Students could choose one close to where they live, one with a respectable reputation in the major they prefer or a large school instead a smaller. All of these factors can be important, but depending on your preferences, some may be more significant than others may. It is important to define what is important and what is not, in other words, the priorities that could make the difference between a good and a bad choice. In addition, the metric used to measure these priorities has to be focused on the objective that every student need to analyze before to start his academic path. There are different theories and data on how students made this selection.
…show more content…
However, the 75% of graduate affirm that personal interests influenced their choice while only 65% confirm that the future employment opportunities made the same. For example, reputation is greatly important to around half of the students. Meanwhile, proximity to home, parents and friends environment matter much less.
Kelly (2016) does another analysis on a special of The Globe and Mail; she states students select their universities for many distinct reasons. Therefore, some students may be cost sensitive, while others may only care about quality of institutions. For this year’s Canadian University Report, she collects data from universities, professors and, most importantly, hundreds of students. Moreover, the author searched for public data sources, such as information and surveys by Statistics
Many European countries have offered free university education to encourage qualified students to apply for higher education. Rather than collecting tuition fees from students, these universities are being funded through taxation and charitable organizations. However, the result is not completely what the government has expected. The increasing number of enrollments has made job market very competitive, and many university graduates end up unemployed or underemployed. Moreover, universities are focusing more on the quantity instead of quality of education, which made the value of university degree shrink substantially. Taxpayers complain using the tax payments to subsidize only the students who want to attend universities is not fair, as university education is only one of the many choices for students who graduates from high school and students may have different goals. Currently in Canada, we are having more university graduates than the economy can absorb. If tuition becomes free, more students will be attending universities. However, if the number of jobs created does not match the increase in university graduates, the rising unemployment rate can trigger even more social issues.
College has become a norm in today’s society so much so, that the average costs of higher education are not really discussed. A public two-year in-district college was $3,520 for a full-time undergraduate student in 2016-2017 (Baum 68). Baum also declares that a public four-year in-state undergraduate tuition was $9,650; a public four-year out-of-state college cost $24,930; a private nonprofit four-year college costs $33,480; and a for-profit college cost $16,000 for that same school year. (68). Across the nation, figures will vary because of the obvious geographical region differences, but also because of price discrimination. Price discrimination allows institutions to discount their prices for a lot of students (Baum 79). Institutions do this based on individual student circumstances, and it segments the market. Institutions
When searching for a more in detailed response to my question on how expensive tuition was during the time my grandfather attended college, I ,at first, thought this newspaper article was an excellent source. After further research I realized that this source should be rejected because the tuition prices were based from the Canadian University. Since my grandfather attended Alabama A&M, this source brought no use to
In todays society universities seem to only worry about where they sit on the ranking list amongst other universities. According to Nicolaus Mills the means of a higher education “lies in the commitment of colleges and universities have made to winning the rating war” (Par 4). This shows how university now value a higher education upon where a university sits on the ranking list instead of the prestigious education that they offer. With universities fighting to become number one on the list most of them have decided to “increase spending for student services that on a percentage basis outpace their increases in academic instruction” (Mills Par.9) This claims that the raise of universities spending money on student services such as
The cost of tuition among colleges and universities is highly diversified and indefinite. Students shouldn’t be financial problems that are associated with the high tuition cost for their education because it creates unnecessary stress and financial problems. The student’s primary concern should be their academic performance and learning. The tuition fee includes extracurricular expenses such as lifestyle amenities that may not be essential toward the student education yet they are still being charged for it. Universities and colleges are lacking a stable and regulated tuition system to provide a better education for a reasonable price. The high tuition cost affects the academic performance, enrollment in higher education, and increase
In Gary Rhoades article, The Higher Education We Choose, Collectively: Reembodying and Repolicitizing Choice, Rhoades “consider[s] three areas of higher education scholarship, policy, and practice” when choosing higher education. Rhoades considers college costs and family processes which compares how the future college student will look at a certain college. If the college they are looking at is too expensive they may feel like the expenses will terribly affect their family and may choose to not go to that college or college at all. He also researched the colleges’ physical placement and proximity
They worry how much they will spend and get every semester. Hrabowski presents, “Students and families should learn as much as possible about each institution they are considering. They should also estimate the net costs, looking carefully at expenses and anticipated grants and loans” (260). He advises that students need to research information particularly before they attend to college. Colleges should explain to students and their families clearly about their monetary inputs and outputs, so that they can focus on studying to achieve their goals as soon as possible.
Student debt is a national crisis that can be avoided no longer. The Canadian youth have been abandoned with the exponentially rising costs of university tuition, and if upward trends continue, both the country and its citizens will be adversely affected. In order to stop the negative effects caused, a change must must be made; making university tuition free. Although the cost would be great, the consequential rewards of this investment would be far greater, in terms of national prosperity and income equality. University education should be made free as it would greatly benefit the Canadian economy and lessen the financial strains that students and their families face.
Welcome to today’s fight! In the blue corner we have the State universities and in the red corner we have Ivy league universities. Our referees are graduating high school seniors looking for their perfect fit for the next four years. Our spectators and commentators are their parents. The fight starts off with the way students analyze schools and compare different educations. Comparison between state and ivy show up in references like the “Ivies of the South” and “Harvard of West Coast Schools”. These references show that Ivy League schools demand a higher prestige and more rigorous academic plans rather than State schools. This hints to the assumption that a Harvard student would be chosen over and Auburn student almost ninety percent of the time. This topic will ultimately lead to the overall research question on whether state schools should be free. The fight in the end genuinely just boils down to the individual student budget, preference and availability.
Before I chose a graduate school, I determined what my criteria is. My criteria is the location of the school, tuition cost, and graduation rate. For location, I want to be as close to family and friends as possible as they are important to me. With them being closer, I am able to
The choices we make are based on our values. I value my education, therefore, I budget some of my money towards college. I choose to attend the Ivy League school of my dreams, U of the Arts in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania because it offers the best seminars in how you can extend your true self and personality, as well as the ability for students to express their unique inventions to work on real-world projects like the redesigning of the parking signage for the City of Philadelphia, to create an intranet interface for the renowned Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia to monitor patient care, or to design a presentation for a statewide advocacy group that explains the educational expenditures, among various other
Corporate universities play a major role in producing masses of apathetic and lethargic students caught in oppressive social, political, and economical systems. Corporatization of universities has made education into a market with universities obsessing over their rankings with ceaseless advertising and promotion; therefore, students in return appropriately respond as customers rather than scholars (Singleton-Jackson, 2010). This business model leads the arts and humanities funding to suffer or dissipate completely. SUNY Albany and the University of Pittsburgh both threatened to terminate programs related to language, theater, classics, and religion; in addition, the University of Alberta suspended admission to 20 humanities programs (Hunter and Mohamed 2013). The University of British Columbia, have made huge increases in tuition to help fund more advertising and to implement more accessories, offering packaged deals with housing, meal plans, and recreation, to cater to consumers denying lower income students an opportunity on education. UBC has conformed to the corporatization of the university and is clearly displayed by the massive buildings named under corporate and private sponsor such as the Chan Center and Henry Angus buildings.
The choice of where to attend college is one of the biggest decisions that one will have to make in his lifetime. There are many things to consider when comparing colleges, but one of the most important personal choices that a future college student will have to make is whether to go away for college or to stay close to home. Each choice has its pros and cons, but which choice has more pros than cons? There are three main ideas to consider when pondering this choice: comfort, cost, and community. Staying close to home when attending college is a better choice compared to going away when considering the three ideas of comfort, cost, and community.
The school chosen is an investment in your child’s future and not a decision to be made lightly. Education is vital in today’s society. Parents will always want what is best for their child especially when it comes to education. The better the education the farther you will go in life. Deciding what and where to receive the best education is always going to be a question for the masses.
In 1991 a study was done at the University of London which looked at the factors that affect parents when choosing a secondary school (2). The results of this study were based on responses to a questionnaire given to over 2000 parents whose children were to attend one of fifteen secondary schools around a town close to London. This study showed that the factors that affected this decision varied significantly according to the