INTRODUCTION
The export of towel from Pakistan to other countries is not generating much revenue but it has some importance as Pakistan ranks with India and China among the world’s leading towel manufacturers. The towel export business is specially a good one for Karachi-based producers, bringing Pakistan $300 million each year from sales to the United States alone. It is also good for urban Pakistanis seeking factory work According to the Towel Manufacturers Association of Pakistan (TMA), the manufacture of nine tons of towels—enough to fill a standard 20x20x8-foot shipping container puts 485 Pakistani men and women to work.
However a closer look finds that other countries trade policies especially America’s trade policy is not
…show more content…
And the more important thing is that the towel exports topped the list of textile manufactures by registering 23.5 percent growth in value During FY10, despite the imposition of countervailing duties by the US Commerce Department. A 6.2 percent decline in per-unit prices was more than offset by a marked improvement in the Export volume (US$ 62.0 million), resulting in a net gain of US$ 46.1 million in export earnings.
Export Receipts of Towel from Jan 2008 to Aug 2010 (Thousand US Dollar)
2008 | | Jan | 32,749 | Feb | 36,567 | Mar | 38,553 | April | 38,261 | May | 47,823 | June | 36,949 | July | 44,770 | Aug | 47,615 | Sep | 51,040 | Oct | 54,869 | Nov | 48,587 | Dec | 46,208 | 2009 | | Jan | 39,346 | Feb | 43,584 | Mar | 41,960 | April | 36,192 | May | 42,944 Continued…. | June | 49,476 | July | 48,081 | Aug | 45,444 | Sep | 45,596 | Oct | 49,518 | Nov | 43,366 | Dec | 55,268 | 2010 | | Jan | 46,564 | Feb | 48,925 | Mar | 53,008 | April | 58,303 | May | 55,721 | June | 53,074 | July | 48,737 | Aug | 51,045 |
The above table shows the total export receipts of towel from other countries, if you notice from the Jan 2008 receipts are fluctuating normally in the starting of the year but in Oct it increase a little more handsomely which is 54,869 but after that it is decreased in the end of the year and in the beginning of 2009
Esquel, one of the leading cotton-shirt-manufacturers in the world came from China and it supplies lots of clothing brand such as Banana Republic, Tommy Hilfiger, Hugo Boss, Brooks Brothers, Abercrombie and Fitch, Nike, Nordstrom and Lands’ End, in addition to private companies (Plunkett Research, Ltd.). However, due to the high demand of the US apparel stores for Chinese products, the low cost, which was the main reason why raw materials are being purchased from China, have increased. China’s competition is huge, with Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Sri Lanka also producing material at cheap prices (Plunkett Research, Ltd.). The US apparel stores can instead purchase from these other Asian countries. It is hard to determine the exact number of suppliers in this industry; but, in general, majority of them are in Asian countries that can provide low-cost raw materials to US-based apparel stores. Therefore, the US apparel stores may acquire higher net profi
International trade is based on having a comparative advantage. Countries produce products that are easier for them to produce, then
The textile industry has undergone enormous change in the past ten years. Global trade in textiles was once regulated by high tariffs and a complex system of import quotes. Not anymore. Textiles used to be produced predominantly in the U.S., Europe and Japan. Not anymore. Textile mills used to dictate fashion, everything from fabric construction to fiber content. Not anymore.
Because of these relationships that are connected between countries, they must not be tampered with in order to stabilize growing infrastructures. The United States, one of the most powerful countries in the world, offers its fair share of keeping international matters in balanced proportions. Author Michael Froman of “The Strategic Logic of Trade” introduces the United States in means of liberalism and his central argument is that without cooperation and partnerships countries cannot thrive and live properly. The United States wants to ensure that all countries are equally balanced and in times of conflict the World Trade Organization, an intergovernmental organization, plays a role in preventing unfair advantages within other counties. An example of this would be Obama’s act to initiate rules along the road of trade with the Trans-Pacific Partnership which is a trade agreement settles between eleven countries in the Asia-Pacific region. Within this treaty there are proposals that the United States draws upon such as addressing forced labor, child labor, proper working conditions, wildlife trafficking, illegal forms of logging and components that generate unsafe overfishing. This treaty also takes a bigger liberal approach for small and medium-size business located in various parts of the world to obtain access within the global market by preventing any abuse towards unrestricted internet access. Reflecting as far back as World War II, anybody can learn that the United States used trade as a tool and an advantage to form
A century ago, the textile and clothing industry was a major part of the U.S. economy, but that is no longer the case. Faced with foreign competitors that can produce quality goods at low cost, many U.S. firms have found it increasingly difficult to produce and sell textiles and clothing at a profit. As a result, they have laid off their workers and shut down their factories. Today, most of the textiles and clothing that Americans consume is imported. The United States and China are economically connected through importing and exporting. Due to the United States being in a large deficit with China, we must remain in good terms with China. China has a very fast growing economy due to their advances in technology and other devices. The benefits are on a global perspective, globalization means more job opportunities. China has cheap labor, which allows them to produce at a lower cost. The story of the textile industry raises important questions for economic policy: How does international trade affect economic well-being? Who gains and who loses from free trade among countries, and how do the gains compare to the losses? A low domestic price indicates that the country or in this case China, has a comparative advantage in producing the good and that the country will become an exporter. A high domestic price indicates that the rest of the world has a comparative advantage in producing the good and that the country will become an importer. China is second to Canada as the United
Trade protectionism, the implementation of tariffs and quotas to restrict imports, is an economic strategy that has been present in U.S. history as far back as the civil war era when it was supported by the republican party (Palen, Marc-William 6). The general purpose is to limit foreign imports and decrease reliance on foreign industries. One hundred and fifty years later, the same methods are existent in U.S. politics. Since Donald Trump began his presidential campaign, he has pledged to decrease the U.S. trade deficit and improve the benefits that the U.S. receives from trade relationships relative to other countries. Trump’s decisions to implement unilateral trade barriers on certain goods, leave the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and renegotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement in order to implement tariffs on Mexican imports to the U.S. all exhibit a strategy of protectionism. Basically, he believes that the U.S. is disadvantaged by trade agreements due to the large trade deficits that the U.S. has with countries such as China, Mexico and Canada. Due to these perceived disadvantages, he is pursuing actions that will reduce these deficits and put the U.S. on the upper end, as he views trade as a zero-sum game in which the U.S. must be “winning”. Looking at this from a systemic level of analysis, Trump’s decisions are influenced by the relative distribution of power in the international system, relating to the balance of trade relationships that the U.S. has with
Apparel industry in Sri Lanka has become one of the most important contributors to Sri Lanka’s GDP. In fact, the industry has grown enormously well during the past 3 decades bring opportunities for locals, internationals, and organizations. Moreover, Sri Lanka apparel industry has definitely helped the country’s development in numerous ways.
is essentially nothing that can be done to stop it. According to this view, technological changes have propelled international economic activity, and governments have been largely irrelevant. Thus, policy liberalization should be
America gets its Barbie dolls, Star Wars action figures, skinny jeans, sneakers, and even our food, from exploitative companies like Mattel, Walmart, the Gap, Forever 21, Chiquita, and Chicken of the Sea. These companies thrive on free trade. Politicians may tout free trade as a helpful, futuristic plan, that will make America the greatest country in the world but there are many people in America that do not understand what free trade really entails.
“The Greening of Trade Wars” Forbes, 183(8), 26. Retrieved May 10, 2009, Forbes.com.) Although many believe that protectionism may indeed afford some advantages for domestic business, opponents of protectionism argue that due to the interdependence of global trade and financial systems, these advantages are offset by many negative consequences (William A. Kerr. (2009). “Recession, International Trade and the Fallacies of Composition.” The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy: Special Section on Geographical Indicators, 10(1), 1–11). For instance, an unintended—and unavoidable—consequence of subsidies and tariffs is higher prices for products available to consumers. Protectionist policies also tend to lower the overall quality of goods available and ultimately increase the tax burden on the general public. Writing in the “No” selection for this debate topic, Professor of Economics at California State University Robert Krol describes the findings of various economic studies of international trade. He looks at the effect of trade on employment and wages as well as examining the costs of trade restrictions. From his research, he concludes that “Although international trade forces significant adjustments in an economy, as the evidence shows, the costs of international trade restrictions on the economy outweigh the limited benefits these restrictions bring to import-competing industries.” (p. 10) The opposing view, taken from Prospect Magazine, is
According to the data, the total volume of textiles exported from China has started a continuous rapid growth since 2001 (the year of China’s accession to the WTO) as shown in the first graph above, which roughly
Based on the market reports of June 2010, Mexico accounted of 24.6 percent of U.S. exports of textiles and apparel. This is primarily because Mexico provides significant market opportunities for producers in the United States to meet the increasingly growing needs and wants of Mexican consumers (Forsythe et. al, 1993). The Mexican apparel industry has developed to become the largest importer of apparel
Those who oppose free trade do so because they view it in zero-sum terms instead of absolute terms. President Trump’s views on trade is similar to this zero-sum way of thinking. He claims that trade has decimated manufacturing in America, despite evidence that says that automation and productivity are the main culprits for this decline. Writing in Foreign Affairs, Douglas Irwin, points to “one representative study, by the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University, [that] found that pro¬ductivity growth accounted for more than 85 percent of the job loss in manufacturing between 2000 and 2010” (Irwin, 2016). The president also seems to not understand that trade lowers prices for consumers. A Mercatus Center paper
Ever since the first involvement of government in international trade, many people have posed their opinion about what the role of government should be in it. Different factors are involved when it comes to deciding what this should be. It impacts a lot of people, so in order to do that, trade policy must be properly defined, identify what the roles of government currently are, and their involvement in it, and then analyse what should be their role. Trade policy is how a country carries out trade with other countries (Commercial Policy, n.d). Even though a lot of people support government intervention in international trade, countries would benefit a lot more if the government removes protectionism and promotes free trade instead.
The Untied States is one of the largest exporters in the world. They are the world’s third-largest exporters. In 2015 the United States total trade with foreign countries was 4.99 trillion. They imported more than they exported. That’s a huge issue we are facing here in the United States. We have a negative balance of trade, also known as a trade deficit since our imports are greater. We exported 2.23 trillion and imported 2.76 trillion. For these reasons, it has been blamed that it is destroying our economy and the caused for having a lack of jobs. People are blaming imports for their lost of jobs. It is cheaper to produce other materials in other countries because they have more access to other natural resources than we do. They don’t understand the importance to have a trade balance.