Existing lease accounting standards require lessees to classify their lease contracts as either finance or operating leases. If a lease is classified as a finance lease, assets (and liabilities) are recognized in its statement of financial position. For an operating lease, the lessee simply recognizes lease payments as an expense over the lease term. This split into finance and operating leases has given rise to a number of problems.
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has recently issued a combined exposure draft on Leases (ED 2010/09) resulting in a converged standard, in an attempt to rectify the weaknesses in the current standard. Significantly impacting how lessees
…show more content…
The accounting model Proposed[5]
The exposure draft proposes a new accounting model for leases in which:
(a) A lessee would recognize an asset (the right-of-use asset) representing its right to use an underlying asset during the lease term, and a liability to make lease payments (paragraphs 10 and BC5–BC12). The lessee would amortize the right-of-use asset over the expected lease term or the useful life of the underlying asset if shorter. The lessee would incur interest expense on the liability to make lease payments.
(b) A lessor would apply either a performance obligation approach or a derecognition approach to account for the assets and liabilities arising from a lease, depending on whether the lessor retains exposure to significant risks or benefits associated with the underlying asset during or after the expected term of the lease (paragraphs 28, 29 and BC23−BC27).
The ED 2010/09 proposes a model in which a lessee would recognize a “right-of-use” asset representing its right to use the underlying asset, and a liability representing its obligation to pay lease rentals over the lease term. This includes lease contracts classified as operating leases under current requirements, which would significantly affect many users who adjust the amounts presented in financial statements to reflect assets and liabilities arising from operating
Therefore in this agreement the equipment is going to be partially financed by the lessor (Northwest) through a third-party financial institution (Lender) and act as a leveraged lease, wherein the lending company holds the title to the leased asset, while the lessor creates the agreement with the lessee (BNRR) and collects the payment for the use of the equipment. Therefore the lease in this case will be regarded as a financial decision for BNRR
Another way to treat this provision would be not to recognize at the inception of the lease but directly expense the costs when the required maintenance is performed. Regarding the accrual method in Alternative 1, ASC 360-15-25-5 prescribes “the use of accrue-in-advance (accrual) method of accounting for planned maintenance activities is prohibited in annual and interim financial reporting periods.” This is consistent to FASB’s opinion
The third and final question from the case is how would the lease classification change under U.S. GAAP. The FASB codification that deals with leases is ASC 840. U.S. GAAP classifies leases as operating leases or capital leases and it has a section for sale-leaseback transactions as well. Under U.S. GAAP, the lease in this case would be classified as a capital lease. This is because ASC 840-10-25-29 says, “If at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease.” This lease meets two of those criterions. The lease term is equal to 75% of the economic life of the equipment (3 year lease term / 4 year economic life of equipment = .75 or 75%) and the present value of the minimum lease payments “equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the lease property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor” (ASC 840-10-25-1d). The present value of the minimum lease payments does in fact equal or exceed 90 percent of the fair value of the equipment ($248,690 / $265,000 = .94 or 94%). Under ASC 840-10-25-31, the lessee should use the implicit rate to calculate the present value of the lease payments because the lessee already
According to Section 360-10-15-4, the scope of the standard applies to transactions and activities related to recognized long-lived assets of an entity to be held and used, including capital leases of lessees, long-lived assets of lessors subject to operating leases, proved oil and gas properties that are being accounted for using the successful-efforts method of accounting, and long-term prepaid assets.
After adjusting lease expense, it is important to reformulate Income Statement and Balance Sheet to reflect the effect of the adjustments to MYX’s financial statements. To transfer operating lease to financial lease, the remove of lease expense will rise NOPBT by dropping the operating expense. As the nature of asset will be consumed during its economic life, amortisation on lease asset will incur which will plus its operating expense and discount NOPBT.
(c) The term of the lease is equal to 75% or more of the estimated economic life of the leased asset.
The second sub-type lease is a sales-type lease. This lease should be recorded as a sales-type lease when there is a manufacturer’s or dealer’s profit or loss. This type of lease implies that the leased asset is an item of inventory and the seller is earning a gross profit on the sale. The sales-type lease is often occur when manufacturer or dealer using leasing as a means of marketing their products. For sales-type leases, because the critical event is the sale, the initial direct costs associated with obtaining the lease agreement are written off when the sale is recorded at the inception of the lease. These costs are disclosed as selling expenses on the income statement.
To classify the arrangement, ASC 840-10-25-29 states that “If at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease.” On the contrary, if none of the criteria is meet, the lease should be classified as an operating lease (ASC 840-10-25-30)
At the lease commencement, finance leases are capitalised at the fair value of the leased property, otherwise the present value of the minimum lease payments if lower (MHI, 2014). Other short term and long term payables include the relevant rental obligations and net of finance charges (MHI, 2014). Every lease payment is apportioned between the liability and finance charges (MHI, 2014). The finance cost is indicated in the comprehensive income statement for the lease period as well as to generate a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period (MHI, 2014). During the lease term, the depreciation is considered for the useful life of the asset such as the property, plant and equipment assigned under finance leases (MHI, 2014). The portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are persevered by the lessor are categorized as operating leases for leases (MHI, 2014). For the period of the lease, all payments made under operating leases less any incentives from lessor are indicated in the comprehensive income statement on a straight-line basis (MHI,
b. Any guarantee by the lessee of the lessor 's debt and the lessee 's obligation to pay (apart from the rental payments) executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes in connection with the leased property.
David Jones does not included leases as part of their intangible assets but Myer does. This shows the different ways of recording accounting record between its competitors, and managers have an incentive to determine on the choice of recording items. This reflects business operation reflecting in its underlying business reality. Therefore, manager has higher chance to manipulate the accounting
According to IAS 17.20, at the beginning of the lease term, lessees shall recognise finance leases as assets and liabilities in their statements of financial position at a lower or equal amount to the fair value of the leased property and the present value of the minimum lease payments, determined at the start of the lease. The discount rate used in calculation of the present value of the minimum lease payments is the interest rate implied in the lease, if only is it feasible to determine. If it is not possible, the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate could be used. Therefore, any initial direct costs of the lessee are added to the amount recognised as an asset. Furthermore, as stated by IAS 17.25, finance lease payments should be allocated
leased asset have been transferred from the lessor to the lessee. Under EAS, the leased asset is recognized in the lessor