For the ancient peoples of the world, the idea of fate was seen as a concrete structure for which everyone had to follow. Every respective culture identifies or worships a deity of fate, whether it be the benevolent Laima in Eastern European myth, or the horrible Mahākāla in East Asian religion. While these represent fate for humans, few gods reach the direct intervention with humans that the Greek Morai do. These gods, typically depicted as three female spinners, direct the fate of humans in an unwavering path. The destiny they spin may not be desired or envied, but a path is chosen before feet ever reach it. For Oedipus, this fate led to his downfall and rejection by both his peers and the gods above. However, while Oedipus was held accountable for his crimes on the mortal plane, he should be innocent in the divine one. Because of the …show more content…
While Oedipus did kill a man, he was provoked to do so. Not only this, but Oedipus had not realized this was his true father; furthermore, Oedipus was traveling to Thebes simply because he did not want to kill who he believed to be his father. So while he may have been viewed as a patricide, he should not be considered guilty for that crime. When Oedipus married and conceived a child with Iocasta, the same as before is true. Oedipus has never consciously met this person in his life, and when he engages in the incestous relationship, it is unwittingly and innocently. Oedipus's innocence is made more palpable when his guilt is considered. Oedipus exhibits genuine guilt when he discovers the truth about his life. When he discovers that Iocasta commits suicide out of shame, he blinds himself and exiles himself out of deep remorse. If he did not feel guilty for his actions, he would not have punished himself in so deeply a way. Clearly, Oedipus should not be held accountable for his actions, as they had been predetermined long before he was
In my opinion, Oedipus does not deserve what he got and is a victim of fate. This is because all his actions were unintentional. However, some of his actions were ignorant. Right from the beginning we see how Oedipus was envisioned to kill his father and marry his mother, thus his feet being pinned together and him
Oedipus is innocent because he did not know the truth about his real parents. He thinks that his parents are Polybus and Merope, which in fact had adopted him when he was an infant, while his real parents are King Laius and Queen Jocasta of Thebes (Sophocles 746-7). After King Laius and Queen Jocasta have Oedipus, they are told by an
In Sophocles' Oedipus the King, the element of fate versus freewill shows up frequently all through the play. It is foreseen to Oedipus' parents, Jocasta and Laius, that their child would grow up to slaughter his father and wed his mother. Jocasta and Laius endeavor to dispose of their child, however, fate triumphs. Oedipus' fate all through the play has been chosen by the fate which adds to his annihilation. Various societies and cultures all through history have embraced similar perspectives, accepting a fate or destiny for their lives. Such points of view are very common is Greek myths who had confidence in "the three Fates" — goddesses who controlled the lives of individuals and the world in general. Clotho the youngest spins the thread of human life. She decides who will be born and when. Lachesis, a matron, measures the thread deciding a person’s lot in life. She is shown with a measuring stick, a scroll, a book, or a globe that represents the horoscope. Atropos, the oldest, choses the mechanism of death and ends the life of each mortal by cutting their thread. She is usually portrayed with a cutting instrument, a scroll, a wax tablet, a sundial, or a pair of scales. Even in modern day, some Christian philosophies incorporate destiny as fate. Many Jews acknowledge that their God has an arrangement for their people and nation.
Fate as defined by the Merriam Webster dictionary is ‘an inevitable and often adverse outcome, condition, or end’. Sophocles discusses fate vs free will in his plays. In the play Oedipus Rex there was a prophecy that Oedipus was destined to kill his father and marry his mother, he attempts to escape his destiny by running away to Thebes where he meets his fate. In the play Antigone, that main character Antigone decides to go against Creon’s (her uncle who has inherited the throne) decree and bury the brother, Polynices, knowing the consequences would lead to her death. In Sophocles’ plays Oedipus Rex and Antigone, the theme is mankind not being able to escape their fate.
In the beginning of the story, Oedipus is very taken back by the situation. He will not accept the truth of his fate and accuses Tiresias of lying to him so Oedipus’s bother- in- law, Creon, could take the throne. Oedipus is extremely dumbfounded by this news because he had no knowledge of killing his father or marrying his mother, but what he learns later is that who he thought were his parents were not his real parents. When he finally realizes that he did in fact marry his own mother and kill his father, he accepts it and punishes himself in order to uphold his promise to his people. By this point there is no way Oedipus can escape his fate. Tiresias says to Oedipus, “No man in the world can make the gods do more than the gods will” (811). Since he did kill his father, the previous king, Oedipus has to be shunned by all of Thebes. Because there is no way of changing his fate, he accepts his responsibilities by giving himself the punishment he assigned to the murderer of Laius.
In the book Oedipus the King by Sophocles, there are many controversies on whether Oedipus is guilty of his actions or innocent. Oedipus is a guilty man and his action proved so in the play. Oedipus should be held liable for his crimes of patricide (killing his father) and marrying and having a sexual relationship his mother. Oedipus knew nothing about the past of Thebes however, what was done cannot be taken back. His actions were wrong because incest is unethical, and murdering someone is a crime. He guilty because guilt lies in the act of doing, not in intention. In addition to the prophecy, Oedipus is also guilty of hubris because he displayed excessive pride. The choice was his, and this accounts for some of his guilt. Oedipus is
Fate is defined as the development of events beyond a person’s control. In “Oedipus the King,” Sophocles, tells us about a tragic hero (Oedipus) in which his life is predetermined by fate, because he is deprived of free will. The first act of fate on Oedipus was him being saved by a shepherd when his parents (Queen Jocasta and King Laius) left him in the mountains to die, he then met and killed his father without knowing who he was, and last, he married Queen Jocasta, later realizing that she was his mother. Every action that Oedipus took to prevent his fate, would soon be the ultimate downfall, not only for himself, but for his family and the people of Thebes.
Oedipus doesn’t realize the personal consequences his hunt for the murderer will have for him, and his loyalty to the truth is based on his ignorance. His pride, ignorance and unrelenting quest for the truth ultimately contributed to his destruction. An example is when Oedipus was told [after threatening Tiresias], that he was responsible for the murder of Laius. He became enraged and called the old oracle a liar. However, Oedipus thought he could outsmart the gods, but in fact, his every action moved him closer to the prophesy becoming a reality. Upon discovery of the truth of his birth from the herdsman, Oedipus cries, “O god all come true, all burst to light!/O light now let me look my last on you!/I stand revealed at last cursed in my birth, cursed in marriage, cursed in the lives I cut down with these hands”. (631). Oedipus knew that his fate had indeed come to pass and feels cursed by it. Oedipus was guilt, of killing his father and marrying his mother. He punishes himself for the sins he committed by gouging out his eyes. The true sin is when he attempts to raise himself to the level of the gods by trying to escape his fate. Oedipus is accepting the full burden of his acts and knows that he must be punished for his sins. Therefore, this last act of gouging out his eyes was the result of Oedipus’ free will and his tragic fate came about because every sin must
Oedipus was guilty of his crimes to his mother and father because he physically committed the crimes, he had to fulfill the prophecy, and in a court of law, he would be considered guilty in a court of law. Oedipus physically committed the crimes. As he was travelling from Corinth to escape the parents he was raised by, he got in a fight and killed his father who was King of Thebes. He did not know it was his father, but he still killed him.
Oedipus’ stubbornness in listening to Teiresias, infuriates Teiresias which forces him to also expose Oedipus as marrying his mother. In this encounter, Teiresias uses the themes of blindness versus sight when he says, “You have your eyes but see not where you are in sin, nor where you live, nor whom you live with.” Oedipus has eyes, yet his ignorance causes him to be too blind to see his sins. When Oedipus officially understands at the end of the play that he was the killer, Oedipus’ character has been trampled; Oedipus has not only killed someone but has also procreated and married his mother. To redeem himself, Oedipus blinds himself, which is in itself a
Finding out who his true father is seems important for someone who has just been told he will kill his father. Nor is Oedipus particularly intelligent about the way he conducts himself. Even though he did not know that Laius and Jocasta were his parents, he still does kill a man old enough to be his father and marry a woman old enough to be his mother. One would think that a man with as disturbing a prophesy over his head as Oedipus would be very careful about who he married or killed. Blindly he pursues the truth when others warn him not to; although he has already fulfilled the prophesy, he does not know it, and if he left well enough alone, he could continue to live in blissful ignorance. But instead he stubbornly and foolishly rummages through his past until he discovers the awful truth. In this way, Jocasta 's death and his blindness are his own fault.
Based on the play, Oedipus Rex, I feel that Oedipus is guilty for three main reasons. One, Tiresias tells Oedipus that he is guilty, of killing his father, and Oedipus still says that Tiresias, the prophet, is wrong. Second, I know in the play, Oedipus discovers that he has a prophecy hanging over his head saying that he will kill his father and marry his mother, and yet he never tries to take measures to prevent that. Finally, there is a prophecy in the play that says he will murder his father and marry his mother. In this type of mythological genre, prophecies always come true.
Are all events predetermined? Does everyone have a prophetic destiny that they must fulfill? If so, who determines their fate? Who—or what—binds them to their fixed ending? Is there really no way to resist? Is fatalism—the theory that all events are preset and inevitable—true? And if it is—is there ever such a thing as free will?
Oedipus was informed by an oracle that he would be the one to murder his father and marry his mother. It is important to know that Oedipus is a descendant of the first King of Thebes and because of this several of his relatives have met tragic deaths by taking unwarranted actions into their own hands. Before Oedipus was born his father Laius was told by the same oracle not to have any children by his wife Jocasta which he did anyway. This was not a situation that originated with Oedipus; it seems that this type of fate is destined to be intertwined in this family’s bloodline.
Oedipus is not innocent for his action at law and does in fact bear the responsibleness for the outcomes that his action at law have caused him to endure.