Brazil’s economy and federal debt
The country I live is Brazil. It’s a third world country that is always needing and owing money over fiscal policies loans and developed countries. Brazil has a very poor and unprepared form of taking care about the country’s economy. It looks like we’re always owing each day more, the taxes are each time bigger and the inflation takes care of the country in a way that, we never know what will happen tomorrow, but the only thing we can predict is that the inflation for Brazilians will be bigger.
Some changes inside the government are totally necessary to stabilize an economy when things do not go as planned. Some government purchases of goods and services, when possible, need to be cut off. If this service is a public utility service, or it provides life quality to citizens, this service should keep existing in order to maintain the order inside the state. If it’s a relative spent, that will not make a huge difference if cut, sometimes needs to be reconsidered for a while.
There are some services that are more difficult to cut or move, since it provides some indispensable needs. One example of this service is the Social Security, that feeds people who contributed the whole life and are now being provided without any action by them. This is a transfer payment made by the government that couldn’t be
…show more content…
In Brazil, because of the unstable economy, the taxes are each time higher and the government lost control, because if they lower the rate, the country will not be able to pay all the debts. If the rates are each time higher (what usually happens), the economy inside the country loses consumers for other countries, and the economy doesn’t develop because people do not spend money inside the country. That’s what happens and that’s why brazilians only buy when they travel
Social Security has been a very beneficial government program for elderly people, and those whom they support, when being an active member in the workforce is no longer an option for reasons such as old age, disability, or death. Destruction of the program, or worse, lack of the aid, would be catastrophic. Without it, it could leave many senior citizens that can no longer
First of all, if the government decides to cut current public expenditure, it will lead to a reduced quantity and quality of public goods and service. For example, closing NHS direct call centres down which results in lower living standard. Moreover as the spending
The increasing integration of trade between economies resulting from globalisation has stimulated high levels of economic growth for Brazil, minimising the country’s current account deficit (CAD). However, a recent steep decline in Brazil’s trade surplus, which narrowed to $2.6 billion in 2013 from $19.4 billion in 2012, has widened the current account deficit to $81.37 billion
However, the economy recovered rapidly during 1968 to 1973 with averaging over 10 percent per annum. The GDP also increased at a rate above 5 percent per annum between 1974 and 1980, except for 1978 (see Exhibit 2). However, Brazil had incurred an extremely high level of indebtedness due to the support of this massive development program. The high interest rates on dollar funds and the unwillingness of foreign lenders to advance additional loans caused a deep economic recession in Brazil. Interest rates directly affect the credit market (loans) because higher interest rates make borrowing more costly. As a result, Brazilian government who aimed to balance the payment had to ask the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for funds.
For More than two decades Brazil suffered badly from high inflation, economic decline, domestic and foreign debt. In 1993 country’s Inflation reached 30 percent a month and as a result the country wouldn’t sustain growth. After many unsuccessful plans to control the inflation, finally Real Plan of Fernando Henrique Cardoso, minister of finance, worked out and brought the inflation down to a single digit.
The government relies on collecting taxes in order to create revenue and function successfully. A decrease in taxes affects business and the government differently. A decrease in taxes is good for business and bad for the government. Many entitites rely on government funds in order to operate and function
Throughout the 21st century, there are multiple situations that arise. However, two of those current problems are, government debt, and education. Statistics show that regardless if it is United States, Federal, State of Local government, the total amount of debt America is in is $18,150,614,147,00. Some of the reasons behind the debt would relate to healthcare programs, social security programs, and defense budget expenses. "A total of 940 billion USA was allocated to healthcare benefit programs, which includes the much talked about Medicare and Medicaid benefits program," (Investopedia). As for the social security program, it is "aimed at providing financial security to the retired pensioners of 65 plus by keeping them above the poverty
The stringent policy of imports tax and duties was seen as a high growth policy. The strategy can be effective in enhancing growth but the main components considered should be basic industrial inputs like fertilizers, steel, petrochemicals etc. However, import substitution and restrictions policies do not favor intangible good especially technology software and knowhow which are often bound to importation. Concerning the companies that require inputs like software, the policy is likely to result in reduced public investment. For instance, the inflation and crisis that followed in 1981 to 1983 so a reduction Brazils gross investment from 21% to 16%. Some of the things that have been quoted as the reasons for the declines was increased uncertainties in the future of the economy. Such uncertainties are posed by unfavorable fiscal policies. In the case of Commutronics, the company fought to invest in the country in amidst of unfavorable policies, however, few companies would stand such policies such policies particularly where the deductions were affecting shareholders capital as was the case for Commutronics (Poterba, 1999).
It is not difficult to understand why Social Security is our country’s most popular government program. Prior to its inception in the 1930’s, more than half the nation’s elderly lived in poverty. The program was designed as a social (old-age) insurance plan which provides a guaranteed income to retired and disabled workers whose loss of wages promises an uncertain economic future. I emphasize the word guaranteed, as this is the issue in contention when considering reform propositions.
The U.S government runs many diverse programs with inconsistent goals and objectives. These programs are incoherent, and the manner in which reporting is done raised more questions than answers. Evaluative studies have shown immense waste, fraud and inefficiencies in many government program, but these programs continues to be funded with taxpayers money. The question is why are unsuccessful government programs rarely terminated? Despite receiving negative-benefit cost ratios, these programs are still operational. There are many reasons for this; however the most important reason is that once policies are institutionalized within the government, it is extraordinarily difficult to terminate them. The government usually takes active consideration
The role of the United States government has increased to detrimental levels over the last century. Our nation is currently over 18 trillion dollars in debt and this number continues to grow everyday. Social programs are leading our nation’s people under a constraining weight of debt and forced dependency on the government. Our government needs to refocus on serving the people instead of enslaving them.
To begin, Latin America is indeed one of the most poor regions in the world. Due to bad leaders, poverty, natural disasters and debt this region is facing a lot of problems due to unsustainability. The problem that seems most sensible to fix is debt. Debt by definition is something typically money that is owed or borrowed. In Latin American’s case the problem is that they borrowed to much money; that in the end was supposed to be payed off but wasn’t. This problem continued when Latin America borrowed money from other countries to repay the US, yet the money unfortunately just kept adding up.
2) The deficit was 29.6 percent of GDP in 1943 shortly after World War II started and during the great depression.
"On a daily basis senior citizens face a choice between buying food, paying the rent, or buying medicine. Senior citizens slice pills into halves because they can't afford
In 1994, Brazil’s central bank sought to kill astronomic inflation by raising the bank lending rate; the rate has been slowly dropped since, but still remains somewhat high at 12%. This has served to curb some of the inflation, which has stabilized from a high of 14.7% in 2003 to 5.0% in 2010; however, 5% is still fairly large. In order to encourage business development, Brazil needs to work on achieving lower bank lending; since these high rates are the result of bank uncertainty rather than an exorbitantly high central bank rate, this will only be possible if Brazilian bureaucracy is improved to the point where banks are reasonably sure of being able to enforce loans. Once Brazil's legal system has improved to the point where it takes significantly less than the 2009 figure of 616 days to enforce a simple credit contract, and when creditors are confident that they'll receive more than the 2009 rate of 17 cents/dollar in the event of a bankruptcy, then creditors will feel comfortable asking for lower rates. As the cost of doing business in Brazil drops, the shadow economy will grow smaller than the current estimate of 40% of GDP, and Brazil's GDP will rise as a result.