preview

Film Censorship

Better Essays

The influence of media on the individual is always the first concern when a new medium of entertainment is introduced in society. Whether it be the idea that violent video games instill aggression in its players, or that exposure to rap music inspires drug use, fear of media’s influence has plagued modern society as new technological advancements inundate Americans’ lives overwhelmingly often. This fear, however, is not limited to the current age of smartphones and virtual reality headsets. When moving pictures first appeared in nickelodeon theaters across the country in the early twentieth century, it was met with similar reactions. Many individuals believed exposing the American public to questionable topics such as criminal activity and prostitution would incite in the audience the desire to replicate the scenes depicted on screen. Among those advocating on behalf of the moving picture were Charles Sprague-Smith and John Collier of the People’s Institute. They …show more content…

Dedicated to proliferating the benefits of film in society, leaders at the Institute believed that legalized censorship would “stifle [...] the freedom of the (film) industry as a mirror of everyday life, hopes, and aspirations of the people” (Rosenbloom 315). The promotion of social reform and education in American society through the medium of film was inhibited by censorship from external legislation, and from within the motion picture industry itself.
Firstly, public uproar over the the release of J.W. Griffiths’s film The Birth of a Nation prompted discussion of racial issues, and increased membership of civil rights organizations whilst resulting in nationwide calls for state level censorship legislation. Demands for censorship of motion picture content had been minimal until the 1915 release of The Birth of a Nation (Rosenbloom 309). The film, which sympathized with

Get Access