Quick Ratio
Similar to the current ratio and net working capital calculations, the quick ratio measures a firm’s ability to pay its current liabilities with only quick assets (“Financial Ratio Analysis,”
n.d.). Quick assets can be converted to cash within 90 days (“Financial Ratio Analysis,” n.d.). A stock is an example of a quick asset as it can be sold for cash when the market opens. To calculate the quick ratio, first we add cash, cash equivalents, short term investments and accounts receivables; then we divide the sum by the current liabilities (“Financial Ratio Analysis,” n.d.).
In the case of the nano-brewery, the value of the numerator is $10,972.18. That value is then divided by $4,073 to give us a quick ratio of 2.69. A quick
…show more content…
As a result, the debt to equity ratio is
1.45.
5
Every industry has different debt to equity standards. Generally speaking, however, a debt to equity ratio greater than one suggest that the company is more risky because it shows that creditors a have a greater stake in the company than investors (“Financial Ratio Analysis,” n.d.).
Furthermore, a ratio higher than one reveals that the company’s debt levels are high and stakeholders should be alert. To lessen debt levels the nano-brewery can re-evaluate its capital structure to find the optimal debt to equity ratio. In the meantime, however, decision makers should be cautious about the company’s debt when thinking about the nano-brewery’s new strategic direction. In this case, the nano-brewery’s debt levels pose a potential threat to the company’s reservoir of liquid assets.
In all, the financial ratios analyzed provide us with an overview of the nano-brewery’s financial standing. The current ratio and quick ratio tell us that the firm is capable of paying its short term obligations with current and quick assets. The positive value of the firm’s net working capital demonstrates that the company is investing in its operations. To effectively understand the value of the net working capital, however, a thorough analysis of the industry is required.
Finally, the high debt to equity ratio reveals that the company has high debt levels and is mostly financed by creditors. Together, these comprehensive financial comparisons
2) The higher ratio of Debt to Total Equity may result to the lower of the debt credit rating. The lower of the credit rating will result to increase of the interest rate which will cost more to the company.
Debt to Equity Ratio of 1.23 more than 1 reveals that more than half of assets are financed by debt.
Debt ratio percentages increased for Company G from 28.34% to 29.94%. Industry quartile is 30, 45 and 66 percent, putting Company G below average. Debt Ratio represents strength for Company G.
Liquidity is important for any firm as it is an assessment of the ability to pay its' liabilities in the short term. There are two main liquidity ratios: the current and the quick ratio. The current ratios divides the current assets by the current liabilities to assess how many times the current assets can pay the current liabilities (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). Traditional ratios are usually in the region of 1.5, but this may vary depending on the industry and nature of the business (Elliott and Elliott, 2011). The current ratio is shown in table 1.
The quick ratio denotes that the company's ability should satisfy the short-term obligations. In brief, how many times can the firm respond its current liabilities by using current assets without the final stock? As many times it can cover its obligations, as better for the company.
The current ratio shows the short-term debt-paying ability of the company also known as liquidity ratio. Components of the current ratio are current assets and current liabilities. To find the current ratio, divide current assets by current liabilities. For example if a current ratio was 2:1, then that company would be able to pay off its short term debt easily. But you should also look at the types of debt the company has because some assets might be larger. For the current ratio a rule of thumb is the ratio should be around 2:1. The company wants to at least make sure that the value of the current assets covers at least the amount of the short-term obligations. In 2013 the current ratio is 1.75 and in 2014 the current ratio is 1.8. This is showing a favorable
Current Liabilities = $940,000 $200,000 = 4.7 (2) Quick ratio = Cash + Cash Equivalents + Short Term Investment + Current Receivables Current Liabilities = $500,000 + $350,000 $200,000 = 4.25 (3) Debt-to-total assets ratio = Total Debt Total Assets = $1,000,000 $ 2,375,000
This ratio is similar to current ratio, except that it excludes inventory from current assets. Inventory is subtracted because it is considered to be less liquid than other current assets, that is, it cannot be easily used to pay for the company’s current liabilities. A company having a quick ratio of at least 1.0, is considered to be financially stable. It has sufficient liquid assets and hence, it will be able to pay back its debts easily (Qasim Saleem et al., 2011).
Return on Total Assets was 4.43% which is below five percent. That indicates that the company is not accurately converting its assets into profit. The total for Return on Stockholders’ Equity was 8.89%, however financial analysts prefer ROE to range between 15-20 %. The company’s low ROE indicates that the company is not generating profit with new investments. Lastly, Debt-to-Equity ratio for the company was 1.01 which indicates that investors and creditors are equally sharing assets. In the view of creditors, they see a high ratio as a risk factor because it can indicate that investors are not investing due to the company’s overall performance. The totals of these three ratios demonstrate that the company’s financial state is not as healthy as it should be.
The Debt to Equity Ratio measures a company’s financial leverage, how much debt a company is using to finance its assets represented in shareholders’ equity. This ratio is important to a potential creditor because it shows the percentage of company financing that comes from creditors and investors. The Debt to Equity Ratio for GAP in 2016 was 1.94 and 1.58 in 2015. The debt to equity ratio for Abercrombie was 0.88 in 2016 and 0.80 in 2015. A lower debt to equity ratio for Abercrombie, being on the decrease, reveal a more financially stable business than for
The debt-to-capital ratio gives users an idea of a company's financial structure, or how it is financing its operations, along with some insight into its financial strength. The higher the debt-to-capital ratio, the more debt the company has compared to its equity. Star River has always depended much on debt for its financing and the trend shows this ratio may get higher in future. Star River, with high debt-to-capital ratios, compared to a general or industry average, may show weak financial strength because the cost of these debts may weigh on the company and
If this ratio is high means company owns too many debts which may decrease their
This group of ratios emphasis can easily indicate the Amcor’s capability to meet short term debt obligations. Current ratio and Quick ratio will be calculated in this part. These two ratios are quite similar, short term creditors, such as bankers and suppliers are interested in this class of ratios, because they can measure the short term debt-paying ability of company.
The quick ratio of 1.46 is a further analysis into the actual monetary values that are highly liquid and excluding fixed assets as part of the assets. The CFO/Avg. current liabilities also show a healthy 73%, 28% in 2004, on average of which is still higher than the industry.
Current ratio of Company X and Y is 1.80, and 2.55 respectively. This ratio presents the proportion of current assets to current liabilities. This ratio provided a measure of degree to which current assets cover current liabilities. Since both companies have excess of current assets over their current liabilities, they met basic requirement of safety margin against uncertainty in realization of current assets and funds flows. Generally, it is suggested that a firm should have neither a very high ratio nor a very low ratio. Very high ratio implies heavy investments in current assets reflecting under utilization of the resources. A very low ratio endangers the business in to risks of not being able to pay short term requirements. Normally, it is advocated to have the current ratio as 2:1 (Baker and Powell, 2009).