Financial Restatement Paper
Financial Restatement Paper
University of Phoenix ACC/537
After the introduction of the Sarbanes Oxley Act lots of companies have had to submit financial restatements in their financials. This paper is to examine the financial restatements that have been done by Kodiak Energy Inc. over the past several years due to incorrect reporting on the value of their stocks. Kodiak Energy entered into an agreement with to purchase land from Thunder River Energy in exchange for shares of stock in the Kodiak Energy Company. Kodiak Energy issued seven million shares reported to be worth $2.00 per share. The SEC decided to look into this arrangement and
…show more content…
Kodiak Energies paid a heavy price
The shareholders were not pleased about the deception that Kodiak Energy had deceived them on and quickly showed them the repercussion of lying and stealing from them. Over the next five years, Kodiak Energies stock went from being worth $3.65 a share to a mere .10. Even though the company tied to rectify the situation with a restatement, their years of dishonesty caught up to them and they were unable to rectify their reputation by simply failing a misstatement. Kodiak Electric almost put themselves out of business by trying to steal $1,125,835 from their shareholders pockets, and reporting it as additional capital paid in to make it seem legitimate.
Restatements can be helpful if they are used to explain honest mistakes. Misstatements cannot be used to cover up illegal accounting procedures. Shareholders will take notice and the end results can be devastating to a company’s business.
References
Flow-Through Shares Explained. (n.d.). Retrieved June 16, 2012, from http://www.flow-throughshares.com/flow-throughexplained.htm
Kodiak Energy, Inc. Restatement of Financials. (2009, March 17). Marketwire: press release distribution, newswire, public relations,investor relations, breaking news, media monitoring. Retrieved June 15, 2012 from http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Kodiak-Energy-Inc-Restatement-of-Financials-TSX-VENTURE-KDK-962647.htm
Kieso, D. E., Weygandt, J.
In looking at the suit filed by Anheuser, we can closer examine how Anheuser- Busch was damaged through the actions taken by Mr. Thayer. Anytime that an insider trading scandal takes place, there is always damages and repercussions. The most identifiable damage is that of money and capital. Anheuser-Busch paid nearly $40 million more for the acquisition of Campbell Taggart due to the active trading of Mr. Thayer, and the rest of the insiders. It is easily identifiable, that one damage to Anheuser-Busch was a $40 million dollar excess payment to acquire Campbell Taggart. By exploring and understanding capital markets, we find other monetary damages to Anheuser-Busch. These damages come from the cost of ongoing lawsuits with the SEC as well as with the defendants, Paul Thayer, and the other insiders. Another monetary damage from the effects of the insider trading is the allocation of management resources during the legal battles and
The maximum share price, if Herbert Kohler is willing to settle with the dissenting shareholders to stop the trail on April 11, 2000, is $120,680. Given the probability of the two outcomes, the expected price for $273,000 per share claim (probability 30%) was $81,900 and the
Fraser, L. M., & Ormiston, A. (201). Understanding financial statements (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
The situation began to unfold when the Securities and Exchange Commission was probing into a restatement of the company's stock price. Kozlowski's business practices raised some eyebrows. In 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) initiated an inquiry into Tyco's practices that resulted in a restatement of the company's earnings. In January, 2002, questionable accounting practices came to light. Tyco had forgiven a $19 million, no-interest loan to Kozlowski in 1998 and had paid the CEO's income taxes on the loan. It was found that he company's stock price had been overrated, and that the CEO and CFO had sold 100 million dollars' worth of shares, and then stated to the public that he was holding them, which was a misrepresentation and misled the investors.
The divestiture of Conoco by DuPont also reflected changing conditions in the energy industry. As noted in a May 12, 1998, article in the New York Times: DuPont bought the oil company in 1981 as insurance against the pricing and supply tactics of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries. But oil prices have been far less volatile than it feared, and DuPont continues to de-emphasize the petrochemical side of its
In September 2008, optimistic about BYD’s application of new energy, Warren Buffett acquired 225 million (10%) of its shares at HK$ 8 per share.
According to our calculations Cooper Copper has an optimum bargaining position because they can offer up to $60.13 (at a 4% growth estimated rate) for it’s the stock in order to acquire the majority its shares. Porter 's offer of $42.00 per share failed to get the majority of shares need to acquire control. VLN 's offered to honor the price of $53.10 for preferred shares. This is the share value that speculators and stockholders would hope to obtain although the actual offer could end up to be much less. According to our calculations and analysis the best possible offer Copper can offer up to $60.13 (at a 4% growth estimated rate) per share for Nicholson stock.
When the first scandal of the Kerala hydroelectric dam became public in February 2009 (Philip, 2009), the stock price dropped almost 22% from $37 to $29 within
Restatement of the Financial Statements is recommended, even though the amount of the error is less than 5% of net income, because the error is potentially material to the lenders in regard to ratios for determining loan qualification.
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity reports changes in the company’s common stock and retained earnings during the accounting period.
Beginning in 2000, CMS Marketing, Services and Trading Company began to make energy trades that had no economic justification. As stated in the Securities and Exchange Commission cease and desist order ¡§CMS materially overstated its revenues, expenses and energy-trading volumes in 2000 and 2001 through the use of undisclosed round-trip energy transactions conducted by its Houston-based energy-trading division, MS&T.¡¨ These trades have now become known as "round-trip" trades. CMS issued false Press Releases describing the trades as low margin trades when in fact there were no margins. The Company admits that $5.2 billion of these trades were made in 2000 and 2001.
Landry’s Debt to Asset ratio also increased from year 2002 to 2003. In 2002 Landry had a debt to asset ratio of 0.39. In 2003 Landry’s debt to asset ratio increased to 0.45. While both numbers are acceptable and considerably low, the increase from 2002 to 2003 could influence potential investors to not invest in Landry’s stock. This increase also suggests that Landry’s debt also increased from 2002 to 2003. Overall, while there was a slight increase from 2002 to 2003 Landry’s still had a good debt to asset ratio. We think that a contributing factor to the debt
On May 24, 2005, Warren E. Buffett, the chairperson and chief executive officer (CEO) of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., announced that MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, would acquire the electric utility PacifiCorp. In Buffett’s largest deal since 1998, and the second largest of his entire career, MidAmerican would purchase PacifiCorp from its parent, Scottish Power plc, for $5.1 billion in cash and $4.3 billion in liabilities and preferred stock. “The energy sector has long interested us, and this is the right fit,” Buffett said. At the announcement, Berkshire Hathaway’s Class A shares closed up 2.4% for the day, for a gain in market value of $2.55
with the massive amount of numbers in company financial statements. For example, they can compute the percentage of net profit a company is generating on the funds ithas deployed. All other things remaining the same, a company that earns a higher percentage of profit compared to other companies is a better investment option.
Apache Corporation, an independent oil and gas exploration and production company founded in 1954 by Raymond Plank whose primary focus was to profit in oil. Their initial investor 's capital of $250,000 in 1954 rose to over a billion dollars in acquisitions by 2001. Acquisitions over a billion included Repsol in Egypt’s Western desert and a