Fine Furniture, Inc. and Jaguar Interiors both agreed to terms of a sales contract. A contract involves two or more parties promising to perform an action in exchange for consideration. Consideration is what each party receives in return for each party’s promise in the contract. In this example, a sale of goods was involved. A sale means that the seller is passing title, or ownership, of the goods to the buyer for a price. Goods are physical items that can be moved at the time of identification to the contract. In this scenario, Fine Furniture, Inc., a furniture manufacturer, offered to sell 1,000 dining room chairs to a buyer, Jaguar Interiors, for the price of $100,000. The sale of goods is the proposed offer of 1,000 dining room chairs for $100,000 in …show more content…
This grants her special rights and privileges. Nora drove to her bank, Bank of the Homeland, to deposit the check into her checking account. Unfortunately, before she even stepped into her car to drive, the check fell out of her pocketbook and onto the street. A gust of wind sent the check onto the street corner and an anonymous woman picked it up. Later that day, the woman cashed the check at a different Bank of the Homeland. After four weeks, Nora noticed that the check was processed and she subsequently called the vice president of her Bank of Homelands branch. She wants the $542 from the paycheck to be credited to her checking account. The vice president says that she will “look into it” and unfortunately for Nora, does not guarantee a resolution to the problem. There are a number of issues to analyze here. First of all, Nora is a holder in due course and this does grant her rights and freedom, from defenses such as fraud in the inducement in the underlying contract, illegality, and duress. However, this does not mean that the bank is liable in this
I don’t believe that Nora could not think for herself. She took a loan to help pay for a trip for her and her sick husband. She knew to forge her recently deceased father’s signature to obtain the loan. And she worked in secret from her husband to pay the loan back. She was naïve to think forgery was not a crime because it was done out of love for her husband, but she did it without thinking she would get caught. She would not have gotten caught if Krogstad didn’t get in his own trouble and proceed to blackmail her. So it makes sense that when she has her anagnorisis and realizes that her husband won’t give her the “miracle” of forgiving her and that she doesn’t even love him, that she chooses to leave him. The only part that does not make sense to me was that she left her husband and her children. As a mother I would never leave my child. But I was fortunate not to have my daughter until I was 28 years old, and had lived and experienced much, and had plenty of time for self-discovery and selfishness. I
It was I who procured the money" (21). Taking a deeper look at this evidence it could be stated that Nora is not doing her role in society which was not to lie neither to borrow money without the concern of her husband. But looking through the lense of analyzing the actions that Nora did, can’t be consider as total madness. Nora had reasons of doing this, as to help her husband out. To have a better understanding of this evidence there is another piece which will clarify everything, "there is no need you should.
When Torvald finds her hairpin stuck in the keyhole of the letter box, Nora tells him it must have been their children trying to get into it, not willing to admit that she had tried to break into his things. Although the truth about her is about to be discovered, Nora wants to preserve the last bits of dignity that she has left, finally worrying about herself before anyone else. This last lie however, leads up to her finally speaking the truth and expressing that she no longer feels that she loves Torvald. Her husband is furious at her, insulting her, and fails to see that every lie that she told was for his sake. Realizing that Torvald can’t see her side of things and will only find fault in what she did, she comes to her decision to leave her family. Nora states that she is not happy and never really was, her marriage to Torvald was as fakes as a doll house according to her. Rather than lie, she is completely honest now and states that she wants to become her own person and learn that which she doesn’t know despite what society might think.
However, Nora soon learns of Krogstad’s discovery of her forgery. She then recognizes that she cannot continue to conceal her past with a clear conscience. As a result, she never plays hide-and-seek with the children again, and, as a result, symbolically recognizes the fact that she “can’t be together with them as much as [she] was” (1031, original). She
b. Make a contract for the transportation of the goods that is reasonable given the nature of the goods and other circumstances.
- the seller is to follow through with what is outlined in a contract. Buyers are required to pay for and accept items as any contract states.
The Seller is a corporation duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of its incorporation as set forth in Schedule 2, with all requisite corporate power and authority to own, operate and lease its properties, and to carry on its business as now being conducted. The Seller is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where the conduct of its business or the ownership of its property requires such qualification. The jurisdictions in which the Seller is qualified to do business are set forth in Schedule 2 hereto.
Three women from Cleveland were discovered conducting a scheme where they were found to be orchestrating a check kiting scheme. The three women attempted to run the money through a casino called The Horseshoe Casino and then withdrawal the money. The women were individually charged with multiple attempts to commit bank fraud. Two of the women forged checks and withdrew the money as cash. The ladies also passed bad checks and stole from banks. The group also used outside individuals to open bank accounts and pass over debit cards to women in the group. Their fraudulent actions accounted to total to 165,000 dollars. The fraud committed by the group of ladies is known as check kiting. The ladies fraudulent activity was discovered by special agents
Nora’s need to please her father and later her husband made her lose her true self and it is through the flow of events that she realizes that she needs to go and find her true self
This is a legal term that is given to the bargained for exchange between the parties in which a contract is made. This can be something of some value that is passed from one party to the other. In addition each party of the contract will gain some benefit from the agreement as well as incur some obligation in exchange for the benefit received.
“What an odd little woman you are! Just like your father-always eager to get hold of money. But the moment you have it, it seems to slip through your fingers somehow; you never know how you got rid of it. Well, one must take you as you are. It’s in the blood. Yes, my dear Nora, you may say what you please, but things of that sort are inheritable.”
At the end of their first reconnection, Nora reveals that her transformation from obedient doll to liberated woman had already begun. She now admires Mrs. Linde for her long years of work and independence and uses it as inspiration for her own. In Mrs. Linde’s trust, Nora exposes her personal act of sovereignty: a few years ago, she had secretly borrowed money to save her husband’s life, incriminating herself. Even though she did the morally correct thing, Nora’s actions are condemnable and
Nora does not at first realize that the rules outside the household apply to her. This is evident in Nora's meeting with Krogstad regarding her borrowed money. In her opinion it was no crime for a woman to do everything possible to save her husband's life. She also believes that her act will be overlooked because of her desperate situation. She fails to see that the law does not take into account the motivation behind her forgery. Marianne Sturman submits that this meeting with Krogstad was her first confrontation with the reality of a "lawful society" and she deals with it by attempting to distract herself with her Christmas decorations (Sturman 16). Thus her first encounter with rules outside of her "doll's house" results in the realization of her naivety and inexperience with the real world due to her subordinate role in society.
wants the reader to realize that Nora was not the fool she allows herself to be