Forensic, Deliberative, and Ceremonial Arguments: Comparison and Examples

Good Essays

Arguments can be made out of just about anything. An argument has two sides, and conveying an opinion is one of those two sides. Arguments sort out the views of others and the support of those arguments represented by those people from past events. These events let others show their argument about what will happen in the future, and of how the future carries on today. Newspaper articles can be arguments, and laws being passed in Congress have a form of argument associated with them. There are many types of arguments that are presented in many ways. In Everything’s an Argument by Andrea A. Lunsford and John J. Ruszkiewicz, information is given about three specific types of argument: forensic, deliberative, and ceremonial. Forensic arguments …show more content…

It is stated that “the problem is that Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who wrote the majority opinion in the DOMA case, did not explicitly address the constitutionality of laws against same-sex marriage, even as he eloquently condemned Congress for demeaning married same-sex couples” (Los Angeles Times). To determine why it is taking so long for the justices to stop prolonging the issue, the article looks at the evidence of how information has not been completely addressed. It is clear that the higher courts have yet to finalize a decision on same-sex marriage. Court observers hypothesized that justices wanted the ruling of same-sex marriage to go to the lower courts because the process is proving will prolong for years until a final decision is made. However, “the speed with which lawyers and lower-court judges are pressing the issue suggests that the justices will have to confront it sooner rather than later” (Los Angeles Times). This is a representation of the definition of a forensic argument, to look at the actions of the past to determine the present.
Moreover, deliberative arguments express ideas about what should happen in the future. An example of a deliberative argument is the Los Angeles Times editorial titled “No warrant, no search of your cellphone”. The argument in this article is that there should be a warrant issued for cell phones to be searched. The article testifies “now that phones

Get Access