preview

Forms of Sexual Harassment: A Case Study

Decent Essays

Under federal law there are two distinct forms of sexual harassment (Paul, 1990). The first form is known as quid pro quo harassment and in order for an action of this form to be successful there must be involvement by a supervisor or other person in authority. The fact that Sam, the alleged harasser, is in a supervising position raises the possibility that his behavior toward Paula may be considered quid pro quo sexual harassment. The fact that Paula has reportedly requested that Sam stop approaching her relative to their continuing a romantic relationship establishes the first element of a quid pro quo action. The second element arises by virtue of the fact that Paula has requested a transfer to another department outside the control and authority of Sam and Sam has apparently blocked Paula's request. Under the requirements of a quid pro quo action the victim's terms of employment or decisions regarding his or her employment must be affected (Brase, 2001). Sam's decision to block Paula's transfer certainly qualifies. In defense of his action to block Paula's transfer Sam has argued that such transfer might endanger Paula's unborn child because the chemicals that are used in the requested department have been shown to be harmful to fetuses. Sam's claim may be legitimate; however, his mere assertion would not qualify as a justifiable reason for denying the transfer. Sam is certainly not a medical expert and, unless such claims are documented by a proper authority outside the

Get Access