Free Trade System Middle Box

According to Colander, "The reason two countries trade is that trade can make both countries better off" (2004, p. 416). In economics, the theory of comparative advantage clarifies why it can be advantageous for two countries to trade, even though one of them may be able to produce every kind of item more cheaply than the other. What matters is not the absolute cost of production, but instead, the ratio between how easily the two countries can produce different kinds of goods. The basic idea of the principle of comparative advantage is that as long as the relative opportunity costs of producing goods differ among countries, then there are potential gains from trade.

If each country specializes in areas where its advantages are greatest or disadvantages are least, the gains from trade will make each country better off than it would be if it remained self-sufficient. [3]

Robert Lansing address how Great Britian would capture ships and inconveniently take them to British ports for inspection (Doc 3). America’s Trade during the War fell, because the British would take the ships in fear that they were war ships attacking them. This led to a decline in Wilson’s Free Trade. The cargo on the ships was used by the time the British ports let the ship free, causing a major disruption in our economy. The report from the American Customs Inspector conveys how the Lusitania was in fact loaded with ammunition (Doc 6).

The Portuguese have a very high advantage with Japan in the trade. When the Portuguese trade with China, they have all the Chinese good that they need. Then, they go to Japan and trade the Chinese goods for Japanese silver. This makes the Portuguese highly rich in silver. The Portuguese then trades with China again, which lets China gain some Japanese silver, while the Portuguese saves some more, because they are receiving more and more of the Japanese silver because of the trade of Chinese goods. This takes advantage of China’s economy, but also makes it grow because little to no silver is being used for the people. (Doc. 4) England is another good example for having an advantage in the trade. England’s main imports were the goods of the Chinese, and the English people would sell the goods to other cities, colonies, or countries that did not have those imports from the East Indies. This gives England more money for trade between the countries that are not near the East Indies or countries that don’t want to trade with China. England then sends a little of the silver to China. If England quit this trade, their economy would drop faster than rain. Because of this trade, their economy and social groups are high, and it keeps China’s status high too, because the silver that is being traded is not going back to the countries that are trading with them. (Doc.

The cause of the african slave trade in the atlantic world happen way back in the year 1500 it would all start when they would use muslim prisoner to go in war they would sell them for cheap so they can go in for war and at first they thought it was a dumb idea because they thought they wouldn't of made any profit because they wouldn't of sold any slaves but it turned out to be one of the thing that made them profit.

What happens when there is a trade imbalance between two major trading countries? Just ask Great Britain and China. It's hard to get by when the country you need goods from does not really need to trade goods with you. This is what happened with Great Britain and the Qing Dynasty. There was a high demand for China's tea in Great Britain but a low demand for Britain's goods in China. Great Britain was in debt with China and they had to do something to get out. As a result, they turned to selling silver to make the imbalance better. China could care less about Great Britain's silver so Great

Imagine initially that the two countries are not trading and that they are each producing at point ‘c’ and keeping all their produce for themselves. Do you think the two nations can benefit from specialization and trade? Explain your answer using the concept of comparative advantage and opportunity costs. First, identify the opportunity cost for each country in each good, and then say which country has a comparative advantage in which good. Note if both countries fully specialize at point e there will be less teacups in the market than prior to trade. Note that Ying at point d and Tai at point e in fact guarantees a gain from trade. Drawing and recognizing the PPF correctly also counts. 4. Using the appropriate diagrams, detail the impact on the

 Free Trade: David Ricardo (support free trade)   o Theory of comparative advantage: For two nations without input factor mobility,  specialisation and trade could result in increased total output and lower costs  than if each nation tried to produce in isolation.    Both nations can benefit from trade if each specialises in good that they  have the lowest opportunity cost, even if one economy is more efficient in  making everything.    However, Comparative advantage in not static, and changes over time in  reality.    Also, comparative advantage assumes that factors of production can’t  move between countries  therefore comparative advantage is set to be  outdated

African society before the era of Triangular Trade thrived in many instances, and was incredibly successful in comparison to notable European societies that came into existence later. Egypt, for instance, excelled in the fields of science, mathematics, medicinal techniques, technological advances, and the fine arts; this progressive society preceded Rome, an ancient civilization traditionally held in high regard. Within African civilization, a gentler form of slavery than that of chattel slavery existed. This once localized system, however, grew rapidly upon the expansion of capitalism and cash crops like sugar. The pursuit of profit drove slavery to grow massively overseas in a relatively short time frame, during which Triangular Trade was

a. The Triangular trade is a phrase that links the trade route of three continents, Europe, Africa, and the American continent. b. The first stage of the Triangular Trade involved merchant ships taking manufactured goods from Europe to West Africa. Reports show that Europe approximately exported $10 million dollars worth of goods to Africa annually. Manufactured goods included cloth, gin, tobacco, beads, iron goods, gunpowder and weapons.

The European expansion into the new world was about three things, god, gold and glory. Columbus himself wanted to travel to Asia to become rich and leave an empire for his sons. The reason Columbus expedition was funded was to create a Spanish dominance of the wealth of Asia, specifically the spice trade. The people who came to the foreign land were conquistadors and missionaries looking to make their mark and spread the religion to the ignorant natives or to conquer the “indians” and claim their riches, but the wealth of the centuries old empires like the aztecs and incas was soon spent and the europeans needed another way become wealthy so they turned to slavery. At first the indigenous people were enough to fill the labor needs but they

However, it was apparent to economists that nations with similar resource endowments exchanged similar products with each other. Economists felt that trade explained solely by comparative advantage was an incomplete analysis of international trade. Furthermore, since the classical trade theory was unable to explain intraindustry trade, economists decided to expand on the classical trade theory by creating a new theory of trade (Carbaugh, 2011). The new theory states that economies of scale provide incentive for a country to specialize in a particular product (Carbaugh, 2011). Furthermore, based on economies of scale, nations with similar factor endowments will trade with each other as sometimes it is beneficial (Carbaugh, 2011). Arguments stemming from this new trade theory puts the economic case for free trade in doubt.

Duy's main argument lies with a few key points, he discusses how the United States has a comparative advantage in service sector jobs, and he falls back on quotes from Alan Binder saying that the United States service sector jobs are extremely vulnerable to off shoring, and that 30 to 40 million service sector jobs are realistically off-shorable. Duy continues on about how US manufacturing jobs are not going to rebound easily, and the price signals to kick off such a rebound are not happening. Duy discusses his frustrations with the current free trade system, and how the ability to manipulate capital capital flows has undermined the free trade communities integrity.

In the first sentence, the author provides us with the global issue at hand-trade. We quickly see that the article focuses on the benefits of trade for the United States. In the article “The Strategic Logic of Trade” Froman (2014) explains the benefits of trade and how it improves the United States overall. Trade provides higher paying jobs, enhances economic growth, and allows the United States to be competitive in the area of trade, which in turn enhances our economy. The article moves forth by explaining how the United States aims to maintain and grow an upper hand in the area of trade around the world, despite other countries having advancing economies. Next, the article explains how to increase trade by developing the United States’

The liberal approach to free trade is heavily associated with the fundamentals of capitalism. Free trade is therefore beneficial to the minority who are capable of manufacturing their goods in societies that have more unskilled labourers and in turn can be compensated less. The labourers in the nations that have the technology to do something better but not necessarily cheaper are at the greatest disadvantage within a liberal free trade political economy.