In regards to the french fry cigarette artifact, the exigency exist as an implication of the dangers of fast food and how the issue with obesity has become an epidemic in our country. The intended audience can be seen as both the general public and consumers of fast food. The audience can be implied because french fries is seen as a symbol for fast food and the United States department of Health and Human services can be seen as the beacon of health to the American people. The invoked audience in this situation can be seen as consumers of fast food and people struggling with weight because the direct issue being portrayed is in regards of fast food and obesity. The constraints can be identified as peoples personal beliefs and lack of evidence presented by the image itself. Two modes of persuasion are clearly used; Pathos and ethos. Pathos is being utilized by the imagery presented in the artifact. The imagery of french fries in a cigarette box creates a negative connotation and connection to the negatives of cigarettes. Ethos is used through the official stamp of the USDHS, confirming the support of a government program dealing directly with public health. The image is creating a sense of authority and credibility through this official seal. One can also argue that logos is in use through the …show more content…
First, this can be an argument of fact because the statement in the picture. The statement can be proved wrong or seen as the truth. For example, the issue of the statement of fact can be whether obesity is passing the death rate of cigarette smokers or if we should consume fast food with caution as the article itself implies. Proposal argument can also be seen in the artifact because how the issue is presented in a vivid manor regarding the consumption of fast food. The proposal in this case is that fast food is as dangerous as a box of cigarettes and should be consumed with
which persuasion was based; these are Ethos – credibility, Pathos - emotional appeals and Logos –
Advertisements are everywhere. From billboards, to magazines, to newspapers, flyers and TV commercials, chances are that you won’t go a day without observing some sort of ad. In most cases, companies use these ads as persuasive tools, deploying rhetorical appeals—logos, pathos, and ethos—to move their audiences to think or act in a certain way. The two magazine ads featured here, both endorsing Pedigree products, serve as excellent examples of how these modes of persuasion are strategically used.
In his article “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” first published in 2013, David Freedman interprets how junk food can end obesity. Some people talk about junk food as one of the worst possible substances to put inside the human body. The number of calories, carbohydrates, and sodium in junk food products is massive, but “health food” can be just as bad. In David H. Freedman’s article, “How Junk Food Can End Obesity,” he explains the many pros and cons to both junk food and health food. Throughout the article, there are many uses of repetition, contrast, anomalies, and literary devices that all work together to correlate Freedman's point. Even though Freedman states that junk food could not end obesity, it is evident that Freedman believes
There’s an appalling epidemic in today’s society sweeping across not only the United States, but all across the globe. This horrible epidemic isn’t the bird flu, or any type of sickness, rather obesity. Today, obesity rates are at an all time high in America. This disease, obesity, is being passed down the family both genetically, and by the terrible eating habits developing in the US. Kids growing up in this generation are facing frightening issues such as increased risk of heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, etc., the list goes on. Zinczenko proves this in his text Don’t Blame the Eater, when he says, “Before 1994, diabetes in children was generally caused by a genetic disorder - Only about 5 percent of childhood causes were obesity-related, or Type 2, diabetes. Today, according to the National Institute of Health, Type 2 diabetes accounts for at least 30 percent of all new childhood cases of diabetes in this country.” (Zinczenko 463) The sad part about it, is these kids more time than not, are born into these types of situations. There’s no surprise that obesity rates in America are directly correlated with the increasing amount of fast food chains popping up on every street corner. These fast food restaurants are masters of the art of advertising, and are using it as the strongest way of increasing sales. This is very dangerous because not all advertisements are true, despite what the common American might think, and it can be used to sway people’s thoughts
Throughout the film, there are a number of explanations presented as to why Americans overeat, resulting in an epidemic of obesity and chronic health problems related to weight. According to the film, obesity is the second largest cause of death in the United States (smoking being number one). Many people believe that the fast food corporations are to blame for America’s problems with obesity, primarily for the reason that the lobbyist representing these companies and the corporation allow extreme advertising techniques, in addition to what the films calls “food marketing”. Still, there’s the other side of the argument that considers personal responsibility and free will as the cause of the national epidemic, making it up to the individual to make better health related choices. Either way, there are countless theories as to why Americans continue to overeat, despite knowing the health risks of being overweight, including biological, psychological, and environmental explanations.
Expressly, the author likens the junk food industry to the tobacco industry and refers to the extensive litigation that ultimately upturned the tobacco trade abolishing their advertising habits. Antagonists opposing the pursuit of court action point to personal, and in the case of children, parental responsibility in food purchasing and consumption, emphasizing that food is a legal substance that children can freely buy and consume. Conversely, the author illustrates that proponents for the use of court action underline the addictive qualities junk foods hold and heavily link the similarities of tobacco and nutritionally poor foods siting the weight of the responsibility should lie in cessation of marketing to naïve children who are unaware of the ill effects of the junk food they
Anti-smoking campaigns aim to induce attitude changes that will cause a behavioural change of not smoking, by employing techniques that target the central or peripheral route processing. The central route prompts reasoning and analysis of arguments, persuading the audience through the message’s content. The peripheral route uses visual cues to appeal to emotions. Each route stimulates differing depths of understanding about the consequences of smoking, and thus, varying levels of commitment to not smoking. This investigation will focus on how effective these campaigns are in inducing higher levels of understanding and commitment to not smoking. Subjective quantitative data will be collected via self-reports. A Visual Analogue
Effective Smoking Cessation Tool or A New Way for Children to be Introduced to Nicotine?
In addition to graphic imagery, many anti-tobacco campaigns contain smoking cues, such as images of lit cigarettes, as well. On the surface, this combination appears as though it would effectively influence audiences and curb smoking using fear tactics and conditioning. While these ads may be effective at preventing people from beginning to smoke, according to Clayton, Leshner, Bolls, and Thorson (2009), this attempt at conditioning smokers to associate smoking with graphic imagery is ineffective and can even backfire and push individuals to react defensively and go smoke. Although some level of negativity is required to incite behavior change in anti-tobacco content (Clayton, Leshner, Bolls, and Thorson, 2009), examining how individuals process mediated content can provide insight into how negative intensity can be effectively presented.
I really enjoyed reading your SOAP note, great job! From the patient's social history, I see that he smokes cigarettes when he drinks on the weekends. Unfortunately, smoking and wound healing do not go together. Studies have shown that just one puff of a cigarette can further restrict the amount of needed oxygen and blood traveling to the place of injury (Wound Care Clinic, 2013). Since oxygen is the basis for wound healing, smoking deprives the body of the needed oxygen required to build and repair cells. An interesting fact is that smoking a single cigarette creases a vasoconstriction effect for up to 90minutes, while smoking a pack results in tissue hypoxia that last an entire day (Rayner, 2006).Also due to his smoking status, he will
I’ve only heard the name Sally Mann a couple of times, and when I searched her up more I found myself liking her works because of the controversial themes and morbid imagery, not to mention I am a fan of black and white photography. I delved deep into her photos, one of her works titled “Candy Cigarette” soon being my favorite. After again looking into her works a new piece has caught my eye, it being from her “Immediate Family” photobook collection. At first, I liked the photo because the soft contrast and natural lighting made it pleasing to the eye but then I started to look at the minor details.
Lighting up a cigarette means that you are saying your life is not worth living. teens lifestyle in the past was much better than today’s teens, today’s teens have many health problems because of cigarettes compared to teens lifestyle in the past who have not had any disease before. The three solutions to solve this problem stop teens from smoking are provide education, put strict laws, and control the media.
Cigarette was interesting to me because even the kids were smoking cigarettes and here in America it is illegal and also, the parents didn't even care.
The smoking unit was very meaningful to me and truly helped me a lot. During the unit, I was able to gain knowledge on smoking and make new connections to ensure a healthy lifestyle in the future. When physically seeing the different types of ways that I can smoke and the negative impacts it has on my body, it helped me to have a better understanding on how it will affect all the aspects in my life. Before learning about smoking from this unit, I wasn’t fully aware of what smoking can do to me. My family doesn’t tolerate smoking so I never found the importance about learning about it. When I found out about the consequences that I would get if I smoked, I realized it’s something that I should really know about because a lot of people suffer
During the time between 2011 and 2014 the modern E- Cigarette became popular among teens and people age 20-30. Ever since, parents and coworkers have been questioning the safety of liquid vaporizing devices and if the government should regulate them. Vaporizers recently arrived to the market, therefore the US has been forced to put laws in place to restrict the age of those able to purchase and use these accessories. While there has not been any solid evidence that the act of liquid vaporizing is detrimental to one’s health, there is still speculation about problems with vaporizing, and ways to solve them.