Q5. Meekosha (2007) argues that disability is gendered concept. identify 3 gendered concept dimensions to disability and discuss critically. illustrate your argument by drawing on 'real-world ' example.
Meekosha (161) argues that disability is a gendered concept. Race, Ethnicity and gender are three gendered concept dimensions to disability. They can be seen in real world through social and medical models where disability is defined diversely in different backgrounds. In various contexts disabled people face gender based problems like sexuality and their disability is mutually inflected by race. Despite them facing all these gendered based problems society provides them with many facilities like: disabled games/sports, public places-different toilets and parking which are easily available and convenient for them (Reynolds et al. 14). These differences like separate toilets, parking, etc makes them standout from normal people, this reveals disabled person’s identity, them being different and separated from the normal world . This shows that they are respected and have special rights in the community (Reynolds et al. 14). This essay will primarily address the key issues in relation to disabled people, how they are categorised in different dimensions and based on that they face lot of gendered based problems like exclusion from social community, culturally powerless- seen as invisible, their gender is questioned- disabled women and men’s sexuality called into question,
There are two models that link with equality, diversity and inclusion, the first one is the social model of disability which views discrimination and prejudice as being embedded in today’s society, their attitude’s and their surrounding environment. The social model focuses on who the adult is as person not what their disability or diagnosis is, the focus is on how to improve and empower the individual’s life and lead a more independent life as possible. The second model is the medical model of disability which views adults has having an impairment or lacking in some way, this model focuses on impairments that the adult has and
In Nancy Mairs’ article for The New York Times, “Disability”, published in 1987, she expresses her distaste with the media's representation of handicapped people. Mairs, who struggled with multiple sclerosis herself, clearly and sharply conveys this disgust by stating, “I’m not, for instance, Ms. MS, a walking, talking embodiment of a chronic incurable degenerative disease.” (Mairs 13), and that she is actually, “the advertisers’ dream: Ms. Great American Consumer. And yet the advertisers, who determine nowadays who will get represented publicly and who will not, deny the existence of me and my kind absolutely”(Mairs 14). Mairs is greatly upset that disabled people are defined by their disabilities and, therefore, are underrepresented in public media. This might lead to one asking themselves, but why are they? And the answer, according to Mairs, is quite simple, “To depict disabled people in the ordinary activities of daily life is to admit that there is something ordinary about disability itself, that it may enter anybody’s life”(Mairs 14). Mairs concludes by pointing out how this effacement could have dangerous consequences for both disabled people and, as she called everyone else, TAPs (Temporarily Abled Persons) alike. Treating disabilities as an abnormal characteristic (as opposed to viewing them “as a normal characteristic, one that complicates but does not ruin human existence” (Mairs 15)) can cause one of these repercussions, as it makes the
People who experience a disability are some of the most vulnerable and marginalized groups within our society. This essay will explain what disability is and what it means to have a disability. Disability can often be seen as a form of social deviance, and so, because of this, the disability community can be othered and excluded within mainstream society. This essay will give examples of how othering occurs and how othering could be avoided, when working as a social worker with people with disabilities. Social workers have an extremely important role in the lives of people with a disability. Social workers are often a person with a disability’s voice and advocate and they need to set an example for
The amount of people who live with disabilities is a controversial number. Depending on what law and diagnostic tools used, a person may have a visible disability, or one that may lie beneath the surface of his or her appearance. Some people believe that the term “disability” is merely a label use to hold back, or prescribe helplessness. Meanwhile, individuals who have been properly diagnosed with disabilities struggle to maintain respect and acceptance every day. In plain language, there is a lot of misunderstanding between people with disabilities and those without. It is firstly important to get everyone on the same page regarding the definition of disability.
There are two models that link with equality, diversity and inclusion, the first one is the social model of disability which views discrimination and prejudice as being embedded in today’s society, their attitude’s and their surrounding environment. The social model focuses on who the adult is as person not what their disability or diagnosis is, the focus is on how to improve and empower the individual’s life and lead a more independent life as possible. The second model is the medical model of disability which views adults has having an impairment or lacking in some
Disability is a definition of a physical or mental condition which impacts on a person’s movements, activities and senses. People with disabilities were informed of bias and disadvantages compared to an ordinary person. There are many biases and prejudices contributed to the discrimination of individuals with a disability. Partly because of social connotations the disabled people are useless, cannot work. In fact, these extraordinary people always bring and do incredible things. They not only overcome their grim fate, but also bring good things to life, especially those who are perfectly considering better than an ordinary person, they are not aware of the capacity of individuals disabilities with them characteristics such as loyalty, dedication, and hard work.
The purpose of this essay is to review and evaluate the book Feminist, Queer, Crip by Alison Kafer, by applying two major theoretical concepts to support her work. This book focuses on the framework of queer and crip theory, by applying two influential theorists it creates a whole new perspective on the views of feminism exhibiting how society should all be treated equally. Handling the major theories to support her arguments of the book will display itself as a work of social theory. The main context of this paper will provide a whole new perspective on how disabled individuals should be treated with respects as abled individuals and will be in comparison to Twitter and Teargas, by Zeynep Tufekci.
The social model of disability which views discrimination and prejudice as being embedded in today’s society, their attitudes and their surrounding environment.
The forms of discrimination against women negate or limit their potential for full exercise and enjoyment of basic fundamental freedoms and rights, that patriarchal social structure reinforces the forms of discrimination against women, specifically the ones with disabilities and that racism creates forms of patriarchal subordination for women. Many people with disabilities are affected by and/or susceptible to intersectional discrimination due to gender, race, age, ethnic origin, and other grounds and falls victim to societal and governmental neglect, (India Culture, 2009).
Disability in a socio-cultural context can be defined as "a barrier to participation of people with impairments or chronic illnesses arising from an interaction of the impairment or illness with discriminatory attitudes, cultures, policies or institutional practices" (Booth, 2000). The traditional view of disability often focuses on the individual, highlighting incapacities or failings, a defect, or impairment. This focus creates obstacles to participation on equal terms since an individual who seems to lack certain capacities may not be able to attain autonomy.
Society’s ideological constructs and attitudes towards minority groups are created and reinforced through media imagery. Although negative associations that maintain inequities with regard to race, gender and homophobia (Conner & Bejoian, 2006) have been somewhat relieved, disability is still immersed in harmful connotations that restrict and inhibit the life of people with disabilities in our society.
Sins Invalid’s essay was geared towards who falls under the minority spectrum, such as the disabled, queer, trans, people of color, the poor, etc. This essay was to “create a statement on disability justice, engaging in frequent conversations with a national network of disability justice activists and friends in movement” (4). This body of work is to make a point to enforce unity and progression on how to be equal. It does not matter who you are, what matters is that no body is left behind to be ostracized. The focus of Sins Invalid’s essay it to list and suggest what to dod in situations, and events for those are of the minority that are currently seen as an outcast. However, this essay is focused more on the disabled-body and what one can
All people who have brown hair are not alike. All people who have disabilities are not
Not only do women with disabilities face discrimination due to the stigma around disabilities, but also face discrimination due to the presence of patriarchy in society (Heijden, n.d.). Heijden (n.d.) labels these points of
Galler states, “disabled women share the social stereotype of women in general as being weak and passive” (166-67: 1985). In this, disabled women share a commonality of the feminine gender script with non-disabled women, the notion that women are submissive. Although disabled women share a common aspect of a dominant script with non-disabled women, they also face the issue of de-sexualization. Galler discusses that society assumes that disabled women are asexual and that sexual experiences are impossible due physical imperfections (1985). These assumptions of disabled women are created due to “the absence of sexual information, guidance, encouragement, or social opportunity provided to disabled females” (Galler 168: 1985).