General overview of Chapter 11 entitled- The Huxleyan Warning.
At the beginning of Chapter 11 in Neil Postman’s book, he reminds us that there are two representations of how a culture maybe withered. He writes that a culture either becomes almost like a high security prison or a culture can become just like a mockery.
Postman then goes on to acknowledges that there are several different places that exist in the world where the totalitarianism of thought control exists. Another well-known author named George Orwell describes this in his fantastically written book ‘1984’. Postman does not see America that way…in the way that Orwell viewed America. As an alternative, Postman believes that America is actually threatened by “an enemy with a
…show more content…
Key Concepts for Chapter 11
Postman goes on in the chapter to admit that he cannot offer any real solutions to this problem and he also lists those reasons. The first reason is that most people do not believe this big problem needs a cure and the second reason is that most likely there are no solutions anyway. Postman does give some of his own suggestions that may help fix the problem. The first suggestion that Postman gives is that a person must abandon any type of argument that television may be taken away. He writes that Americans will not abandon the many conveniences that are brought on by the vast forms of technology. They cannot be stopped from creating a more sophisticated technology item to substitute it.
Further on in the chapter, Postman does not really believe that the content that is show on television is the actual problem. Since the real problem is not watch people watch, then this brings on the thought that we can find the solution in the way that we watch television programming. (160). Postman believes that this world has not discovered what television actually is as a type of technology, and as a result, there have not been many conversations about this.
In the chapter, Postman list a short series of questions that he believes should be addressed. Those questions are about the nature of the information that is displayed on television, the psychic effects that this information has on the mind, and how this information changes the definitions of
Postman uses an example of Aldous Huxley to demonstrate that our society has been molded into one where the people are too distracted by the media to examine their lives closer and understand that they are virtually powerless. "Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us"(2nd page of Foreword). We, as a society, love television. We watch it when we are bored, when we are tired, and even keep it on when conversations are being had as background noise. Needless to say we love it. Postman uses this quote to show that television, something that we love, is distracting
In Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman uses an abundant amount of logos to argue his claim. The more that is read, the more difficult it is to dismiss his information. This is because of the consistent use of evidence presented in the form of logos. The entire book is incorporated with facts, statistics, dates, and general logical arguments. In chapter six, Postman stresses how television does not allow for the processing of thoughts. He states, “I should like to illustrate this point by offering the case of the eighty-minute discussion provided by the ABC network on November 20, 1983, following its controversial movie The Day After” (88). The discussion was broadcasted on television with intentions to have valued informational content, but failed miserably according to Postman. He argued this in a logical manner. The discussion lacked deep conversation and the speakers spoke in generalities, as the show did not allow an adequate amount of time. This is a great use of logos because it
The spread of television has affected American households universally, which started in the 1940s but has continued to make a dramatic surge. There is a trend at that is being captured across televisions in households everywhere. Politics, reality television, social media and public information is being broadcast from household to household. Television has in a way become a mode of how we think and interact with each other. Television is starting to leave that bubble where it was strictly entertainment, now television is becoming a source of what we must believe. The consumer demand for television as spiked dramatically, in the way we view ourselves and perceive others in the world around us is through a television screen. Although we are
Aldous Huxley has a humanistic, deep and enlightened view of how society should be, and of what constitutes true happiness. In his novel, Brave New World, he shows his ideas in a very obscure manner. Huxley presents his ideas in a satirical fashion. This sarcastic style of writing helped Huxley show his views in a very captivating and insightful manner. The entire novel describes a dystopia in which intimate relationships, the ability to choose one's destiny, and the importance of family are strictly opposed. In Huxley's mind, however, these three principles are highly regarded as necessary for a meaningful and fulfilling existence.
Postman made it clear that his book is not an attack on the television itself. Instead he asserted that, supplied by the television's form, it is the change in the definition of how we learn, and thus perceive, the world around us that is under his criticism. When it comes to entertainment, Postman admitted that the television does an excellent job. "Television [...] serves us most usefully when presenting junk-entertainment; it serves us most ill when it co-opts serious modes of discourse-news, politics, science, education, commerce, religion-and turns them into entertainment packages" (159). The television does not require viewers to carry thoughts from minute to minute, and their eyes are never unstimulated, as the average duration of a camera view is a mere 3.5 seconds (86). Such brevity of thought and picture are a drastic difference from the way we used to get our information. That is, through the monopoly of the print media. Then contiguous information, uninterrupted by advertisements and thoughts not spliced into sentence-long segments, was expressed from cover to cover. Now, the kind of information (or misinformation) we are accustomed to receiving via the television set is redefining the way we receive and perceive information. It is not
To this day, I disagree that a medium is the cause for our problems. Like the internet, TV is a tool. We feed information into the channels and speak to an audience. Unfortunately, our current division stems from a deliberate choice to block out the channels we don’t like. There’s nothing to the medium, to Netflix or the cable box, that is stopping us from listening to others’ perspectives—clearly, there are a plethora of platforms in which to to tune in. But don’t want to hear
Imagine a world where you are not allowed to be yourself. Imagine a world where morality was abolished and science dominated all aspect of life. Imagine being told what to do with your body, your sexuality. Imagine a world where you are so heavily controlled, even your thoughts are not your own. Imagine not being able to recognize your own emotions that lie inside you. Imagine being taught to rely on prescriptions drugs to cope with not being able to express what you feel inside. Imagine being so heavily controlled, you are oblivious to the veil over your eyes. Aldous Huxley portrays a fantastic peak into our future by conveying
Rather instead we are actually left with the author’s notion television is not yet a fully utilized tool. Through the use of these rhetorical strategies the author has created a convincing argument against a widely held belief of the general public, effectively evoking critical thought unto the public and possibly even changing the view in whole. Even though these strategies alone do not make an argument, when used in order to support one you canget a very effective persuasive, even informative, piece like the one presented
Even though corruption has always occurred amongst the human race, it was not as bearing on a person's everyday life until media made it possible for them to be communicated at a faster pace. In this chapter Postman explains how we have turned from the "Age of Typography" to the "Age of Television" and how the young require all communication to be in the form of entertainment (p.8). He implies that our form of speaking works through "media-metaphors" which do not tell us what the world is like, but instead tells us what it is like without telling us anything. They limit and regulate what the world must be (p.10).
Postman says that, as a result, "all public understanding of these subjects is shaped by the biases of television" (78) and that in the absence of rational discourse, cultural decay is sure to follow.
The thing about this image is that it is becoming all too real. Even today, we have the older generation telling us stories of when they didn’t have cellphones, back-seat TV monitors, and that they always played outside from dusk until dawn. This helps see how fast technology is progressing, and there will be a time when kids will no longer look out the window on road trips and the separation of man and nature is fast approaching. He also asks the rhetorical questions “Why do so many Americans … worth watching” (ln 43-47). The first question makes “so many Americans” (ln 43) hypocritical of not wanting to watch a lot of TV, but yet they make “so many opportunities to watch it” (ln 45). The second question strengthens his argument of not separating the ties of man and nature by igniting a feeling in the reader that that statement is all too
Neil postman does not think television is completely harmful. He loves television for its “junk” because he says that
Postman, the author of “Amusing Ourselves to Death”, discusses how the television has negatively affected discourse in America. He uses examples and historical research to make a claim of how it is effecting discourse. The chapter we are looking into does not relate to the television but rather the newspaper. His central claim of chapter four revolves around the newspaper. He talks about the effect on society and the
Neil Postman writes, Amusing Ourselves to Death to address a television-based epistemology pollutes public communication and its surrounding landscape, not that it pollutes everything. The book was produced in 1984 in a time where television was an emerging epidemic and other forms of communication that today have taken flight, didn’t exist. It is directed to people who have let television drag them away from their Focus and attention to comprehend as they have lost the ability to bring forth your own knowledge and find meaning. Postman’s purpose to spread the word of this discourse and inform them of how much society is being set back due to the over indulging of television
“What is television? What kinds of conversations does it permit? What are intellectual tendencies it encourages? What sort of culture does it produce?” (84) are a few of the questions Postman tries to address throughout the remainder of the book. He wants us to think of television as a medium rather than technology. Postman points out that we do not use television as a communication device, but as an entertainment device. The message of the material has been lost and the entrainment value has become what’s important. Because television is about visuals, it must be rapidly stimulating compared to a book where rational thought is being strategically laid