preview

Genesis Exercise 2: Comparison Of Two Creation Stories

Good Essays

3. Genesis Exercise 2 I have compared the two creation stories in the questions below: 1. How is God named? In Genesis 1:1 – 2:4a, God is named simply as God. There is nothing but God at first and so there is no reason to call him anything but God. It isn’t until Genesis 1:27 that God is first referred to as a male, a detail that seems intentional considering how God is mentioned almost every verse and yet isn’t assigned gender until pretty far into the story. Even the verse before has God saying “ Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness”(Genesis 1:26). This could refer to God as being more than one person, as in older times when people in the area were likely polytheists, or it could represent a reluctance to assign …show more content…

(Carr & Conway, 81) They share the theory that God intended for humans to experience mutual connectedness with one another and that sex was not necessarily a means to reproduce. This almost seems like an argument for protected sex, a concept that very conservative Christians have fought fervently in the last several decades. This struck me as extremely interesting, because it offered a modern interpretation of the Bible and is an example of how the translation or understanding gleaned form the Bible is so adaptable to the culture and generation reading it. While I may personally agree or connect with this interpretation of the story, I am more interested by the ability to assign biblical meaning to fit the desirable messages. 5. Try to imagine what kind of social conditions or situations in the ancient world would have given rise to a story like this. Describe what sort of society/community would have found this story to be …show more content…

In this story the other creatures and plants are formed as an attempt to please the human Adam versus being created in successive order of intelligence as occurs in the previous Genesis creations story. I got hung up on when trying to determine why both of these stories were included. It seems that in other places in the Bible, writers attempted to adapt stories in an effort to eliminate contradictions in favor of prominent ways of thinking. This makes the presence of both stories in Genesis even more troubling. The best explanation I was able to come up with, beyond priestly oversight, which seems extremely unlikely, is that both of these stories speak to different needs, and are not necessarily mutually exclusive in spite of any inconsistencies. While the first highlights the power and Glory of God, the second creates a foundation for appreciation towards God as a parental figure, or even as an example of the might of a ruler. The exile of the humans from Eden can be seen as consequences, not necessarily punishment. It tells the story of personal responsibility, and also offers an explanation for why life is so difficult. If the first story had been the only one in the Bible it would not explain why life was the way it was for early

Get Access