preview

Gladwell's Blowup

Better Essays

IB Public Speaking Gladwell Final IOP: Blowup Teacher Copy 2 Hala Yazdani Good Afternoon Everyone. I am Hala Yazdani and my presentation will be Gladwell’s essay titled “Blowup”, which is about the tragic explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger in 1986. The Thesis I will be Exploring is Gladwell’s Earnest Tone and perspective in Blowup; his choice of word usage which is known as diction and how it conveys his apparent beliefs toward the Challenger explosion and his rationale to assign responsibility for this tragic disaster. Gladwell’s purpose of writing this specific essay is conveyed in the Preface and I quote: “I don't know what to conclude about the Challenger crash. It’s gibberish to me-neatly printed indecipherable lines of …show more content…

On January 28, 1986, the shuttle Challenger broke up after liftoff, bringing a devastating end to the spacecraft’s 10th mission. The disaster claimed the lives of all seven astronauts aboard. Seventy-three seconds later, hundreds on the ground, including the families of the astronauts on board, stared in disbelief as the shuttle exploded in a forking plume of smoke and fire. Millions more watched the wrenching tragedy unfold on live television. Within instants, the spacecraft broke apart and plunged into the ocean, killing the entire crew, traumatizing the nation and throwing NASA’s shuttle program into turmoil. “Nasa was accused of egregious- if not criminal misjudgement” pg. 286 Lets watch this short clip, imagine the horror if you were watching it …show more content…

Everything was out in the open. Everyone was contributing to their individual role, everyone was on task and dedicated to this mission being a success. Gladwell points out in the following quote:. (Q5.) “The cause of the accident was the culture of NASA and that culture led to a series of decisions about the Challenger which very much followed the contours of a normal accident.”(Part 3, 285) Gladwell points out Culture, was the cause. Any actions you take can result in an accident. There is “normalized deviance”, a word Gladwell also uses in the essay. People are aware of the risks they take. There is an acceptable amount of risk one takes, but in Challenger’s case “there was acceptable amount of unpredictability” Another interesting word choice on Gladwell’s part is the word Contour, suggesting accidents usually have the same outline, profile, or form. Further, Gladwell states (Q6.) “The lists of “acceptable risks” on the space shuttle, in fact, filled six volumes.” (Part 3, 287) So this wasn't something new, the risks were always present from the beginning. So if the O-rings had not failed one of these other components listed in these six volumes could have failed leading to the

Get Access