preview

Good And Evil In Lord Of The Flies

Good Essays

Mankind’s Infinite Battle Between Good and Evil
“Human nature is potentially aggressive and destructive and potentially orderly and constructive.” (Mead) Human nature, based on this quote by Margaret Mead, has the potential to develop a flourishing society through positive action, and just as simply holds the ability to destroy it from seemingly inevitable acts of aggression. Humans seem to lack the ability to maintain a society through orderly actions and constructive governing, and tend to resort to aggression when dealing with societal matters. It is the phenomenon, human nature, that has continued to repeat itself throughout history, and one that is explored and modernly assessed by Aldous Huxley. In his psychedelic novel, “Island,” based …show more content…

“Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence—those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. If war, waste, and moneylenders were abolished, you'd collapse. And while you people are overconsuming the rest of the world sinks more and more deeply into chronic disaster.” (Island, 177) It is clear that humans are naturally unable to flourish without introducing a system of military. The “pillars of Western prosperity” are all perceived as evil according to the Buddhist beliefs of Aldous Huxley. Huxley continues to reinstate his disappointment with society and the problems associated with modern civilization, proving the effects of militarization to be a contributing factor to the declination of human kind. The island of Pala is too good. Without a military and lacking greed for power, it is weak. The conspiracy to take over includes Pala’s young ruler in waiting who adamantly rejects the culture’s way of life while siding with the neighboring nation, Rendang’s, imperialist scheme. In an attempt to reinforce the strength of Pala, the Raja sacrifices what had been prominent for so long: happiness. The introduction of a military may have made their country physically stronger, but the decrease in happiness made them weaker than ever before. Huxley, once again, is reiterating his belief that our method of “settling the ordinary and unavoidable conflicts between groups of men” (Case) is not

Get Access