Question:"Consider the figure of Jesus in the Gospel of John, the Gospel of Thomas, or the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Who or what is Jesus, in the Gospel that you have selected?"
I found the Gospel of John was a higher level of philosophy compared to the Gospel of Mark. I understood the baseline story without having to reread it and right away knew this gospel was intended to show more of the potential of Jesus Christ and his way to express the Word of God. John conveys Jesus as a leader who uses metaphors in explaining to the disciples the idea of Jesus Christ. Different metaphors are used in this gospel, yet the one that sticks out the most is lightness and darkness. I found it much simpler to understand the plans of God when reading the gospel of
…show more content…
Another way John portrays Jesus is the symbol of the Lamb which is a sign of purity. The Lamb represents sacrifice in which Jesus is preparing his sacrifice for the world. Even with knowing the result, Jesus continues on his journey as the Lamb of God, going forth into the world and preparing the path for others, explaining, showing the possibility of an eternal afterlife . I found the Gospel of John more emotionally charged because of how he represents Jesus as a sacrifice for the sins of the world, which has no choice in accepting and following till the end. By having such a heavy burden to carry, Jesus still manages to help society understand the reasons behind the sacrifice. Towards the end of the Gospel of John, he describes the process of captivating the memory and teachings of Jesus for when he passes away. This idea can be interpreted as Jesus is a shadow of his former self, a lingering presence which I compared to a view planted like a seed . By explaining to his disciples his death, he mentions his appearance is always with them, John 14:18 “In a little while the world will no longer see me, but you will see
The Gospel of John, the last of the four gospels in the Bible, is a radical departure from the simple style of the synoptic gospels. It is the only one that does not use parables as a way of showing how Jesus taught, and is the only account of several events, including the raising of Lazarus and Jesus turning water into wine. While essentially the gospel is written anonymously, many scholars believe that it was written by the apostle John sometime between the years 85 and 95 CE in Ephesus. The basic story is that of a testimonial of one of the Apostles and his version of Jesus' ministry. It begins by telling of the divine origins of the birth of Jesus, then goes on to prove that He is the Son of
The two Gospels that I 've decided to compare are Luke and John. Luke is considered a Synoptic Gospel and presents the human side of Jesus. Luke takes us through the longer version of his birth and his childhood and focuses on the humanity of Jesus. There was a debate in this story whether or not Jesus was human and raised many question to potential followers. Many said that Jesus was just a spirit but by reading Luke, there was great detail of his humanity. Luke directed this book directly to Gentiles and focused more on the teachings and miracles that Jesus created rather than the law. Stated in the text, Luke’s Gospel also depicts more clearly the way in which the proclamation of the kingdom of God and the accompanying mighty works of Jesus brought the benefits of salvation to marginalized people. Luke also highlights the concern of Jesus for the materially poor, and the duty of his followers to be free from love of possession and to give generously to those in need. John was considered a different story in the Bible and in the Gospel. It was the last story of the Gospels and does not repeat any of the other stories from Matthew, Mark, or Luke. John had the opportunity to see the gospel and its affect it had and based that off the
The Gospel of John’s viewpoint is distinct when compared to the similar stories, parallel sequence and wording of the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. Although John is not included in the Synoptics, all four gospels describe the crucifixion of Jesus. Yet only John (19:26-27) acknowledges the presence of Jesus' mother and "the disciple whom Jesus loved" at the cross. Also, only John 19:31-37 accounts of a soldier who pierces Jesus’ side.
The central theme of the Book of John is “Jesus is the divine Son of God who reveals the Father, providing eternal life to all who believe in him” (Strauss, 2011, 6749). John highly emphasizes Jesus’ identity by providing extensive reports of Jesus’
The Jesus Paper. Question 1. John’s purpose in writing the gospel is so that people might believe “that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing, [one] may have life in his name” (Jn. 20:31). So, the essential identity of Jesus is “the Christ” which is a Greek word for “chosen one” or “anointed one.”
The genius of the Apostle John resides in his ability to penetrate to the theological
It focuses on the personality of Jesus. John presents to us who Jesus is. The opening verses of the four-fold gospels the writers provide us with initial signs to the interests that guide their particular versions of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. St. Mark's gospel opening seems to be the most compacted recounting the baptism of Jesus to begin his identity as the son of God. The opening in St. Matthew's gospels begins with a genealogy that links Jesus as a descendant of both Abraham and David.
The Gospel of John is amazing and unique in its own way. There's a lot of different controversies that arises to the surface because of the differences between John and the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke). There are differences in stories, themes, writing styles, and so on. It's like hearing 4 different people tell the same story. You will always get something different; different answers, details, etc.
Rather than focusing on the biological birth, the Gospel of John encourages readers to seek a second birth from above and allow Jesus to live "in" them and them "in" him, just as he is "in" the Father (Myers, 2014). John was able to see Jesus as the eternal Word, who "became human and made his home among us" (Publishers, 2011). His purpose was to focus on Jesus being the Son of God, and not so much the son of Mary. Perhaps it was for this reason that John did not find the birth of Jesus relevant to the true purpose of
The theme of John in writing his Gospel is the manifestation of Christ’s glory. To accomplish his purpose the apostle selects some of those things in the life and work of Christ that exhibit most clearly his true character and mission (Vaughn, 1965). John explicitly said in his purpose statement (John 20:30-31) that the aim of his Gospel is to present Jesus as the promised Messiah of the Old Testament Scriptures and the unique Son of God. John’s primary means of revealing Jesus as the divine Messiah is the seven sign-miracles and their attendant contexts of teaching, all of which are recorded in the first twelve chapters (Kim, 2010).
The Gospel of John tells of Christ’s ministry in a behind the scenes fashion, as being a follower of Christ. It tells of the miracles Jesus performs and the meaning to his miracles as God’s presence is with him, as well as, the glorification of Jesus, his crucifixion, and towards the end, his resurrection. Appearing to his disciples, telling them of the news of the Kingdom of God. “As The Father sent me, I send you.” (John 20:21) Why would John write this version so differently from the others?
The Synoptic Gospels are superb in their similarities. They’re equally striking in their variations. The Synoptic Gospels narrate the Lord's miracles, parables and messages given to the multitudes.
There are questions that frequently asked by people endlessly asked by those who met Jesus Christ indirect or directly, even today, regardless of if they are Christian or non-Christian, the question is “Who is Jesus Christ? “What is the Gospel?” To answer it simple way, Jesus can be found in the New Testament, especially the Gospels. From His attribute to characteristic and his sincerity, it helps readers to find the questions they had specifically who Jesus is. “It was important to mark that not even the disciples understand Jesus’ true identity before his death, for authentic Christian faith must include the cross and resurrection.”(Boring, 490)“As the meaning of Jesus’ identity as suffering Son of Man comes more sharply into focus, the inseparable bond between Christology and discipleship becomes more clear.”(Boring, 530) There is a method that could help approach the Christology in two ways, first one is the kenosis Christology “is able to portray the life of Jesus as an utterly human identification with the weakness of humanity and to present his suffering and death as real and salvific. Kenosis Christology could not tell the stories of people who became Christian believers during Jesus’ earthly life.”( on the other hand, “the epiphany Christology can tell powerful stories from the life of Jesus that communicate God’s saving act. Such stories were told as events within the pre-Easter framework of Jesus’ life but were told in the light of the Easter faith, by and for
This essay will show contrasts in views on the Gospel of John regarding authorship,dates, and the relationship between John's Gospel and the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Some comparison of thought, concerning composition and life setting, will also be presented.
1. In the Gospel of Mark, there are many important features that define Jesus. One point to make notice is his caring character. There are multiple instances where Jesus feeds an abundant amount of people. He was thankful that people were there to see him, so he did not want them to go home hungry. With seven loaves of bread and a few fish, Jesus fed four thousand people. He also did this again with 5 loaves and 2 fish, and he was able to feed five thousand people because he was compassionate towards them. These situations show that Jesus cared for his people and did not want them to suffer.