William Morris’ Useful Work verses Useless Toil depicts work as centered on the idea that it must aid and give, not only to the worker, but also to the world and community around them. To Morris, work is “not far removed from a blessing, a lightening of life” (Morris, 1). Gordon Gekko, from Wall Street(1987) on the other hand, professes that good work is rooted in the pursuit for money. A notion exemplified in his “Greed is Good’ speech. The needs of himself triumph over the needs of the community leading him to do everything in his power to maintain this notion. Morris directly outlines and differentiates good work from meaningless toil, which is used as a guide to understand the characters portrayed in the movie Wall Street. Considering Useful …show more content…
These three characterizing traits are what Morris believes are necessary for work for they set proper guidelines to ensure work is beneficial for not only oneself but also their community and environment. Of the three, the most influential is the hope of product. Work must be something that produces and gives back to the world what one has taken from it. Work that produces nothing but requires resources is a waste for it goes against the very reason for work; to better oneself and their community. This useless work stems from the problem of a hierarchy of social classes where the rich produce little to none and consume enormously, while the middle and lower classes produce the most yet struggle to consume enough to survive (Morris 2-3). If all social classes were equal in engaging in useful work, then there would be enough produced for all people regardless of social economic status. The other two motivations, hope of pleasure and hope of rest, go hand in hand for they portray work as necessary for an end goal. Morris says “We must feel while we are working that the time will come when we shall not have to work” (Morris 1) Proper work will not only bring pleasure to the worker for it will satisfy their needs and needs of their community, but it will also give that worker solace in that one day he or she …show more content…
Carl Fox, a hardworking maintenance foreman, exemplifies Morris’s view of work while Gordon Gecko, a greedy successful Wall Street player, exemplifies the polar opposite acting as a the perfect example of what useless work is. Carl Fox worked his whole life as someone whose work gave to and aided his community; hope of product. He was a loyal leader and tried to instill his ideas on work to his son, Bud Fox, by saying “you stop going for the easy buck and produce something with your life. Create instead of living off the buying and selling of others” (Wall Street, 1987). This quote directly exemplifies Morris’ idea that good work must produce something for if not it is just a waste of resources and time. Gordon Gekko, on the other hand, is idealized by Bud Fox for his success is seen as good work, but it is merely useless toil derived from the legal taking from others and the destructions of organizations and lives for a turn of profit (Wall Street, 1987). Despite Gordon’s famous speech on ‘Greed is Good’ portraying a man that wants what’s best for others, further analysis of his character, especially in the attempted destruction of Carl Fox’s airline, shows Gekko’s true driving force to be only his own material gain. Gordon Gekko further exemplifies how he is the antithesis of Morris’ view of work for his work has no end game. There is never enough
The descriptions of Phil in “The Company Man” are sardonically accusatory of the present way people live in society. Goodman makes light of how Phil is a heart attack waiting to happen, his seventy-hour workweeks and egg sandwiches. “Of course,”
The Narrator of the story establishes his perspective on work early on as he describes himself as “one of those unambitious lawyers” who enjoys “the cool tranquillity of a snug retreat” as he is a “safe man”(109). Immediately, the Narrator contradicts the idea of hard work for success as he even claims that “the easiest way of life is the best”(108). Instead of working his way to the top, he seems to have stayed stagnant. However, the Narrator technically is “earning a living” but not in the sense that it implies. While the Narrator is aware that he is doing as little work as possible, he is making money to maintain his calm lifestyle. He describes one side his Wall Street office as “what landscapers paints call ‘life’”
A major theme in The Postmortal is greed. The single concept of a selfish desire to have anything you want, drives the entire story. In a futuristic setting, citizens of the United States explore the idea of a cure for aging. The author, Drew Magary, constantly forces the reader to ask the magic question, “what if?”, followed by a series of events exploring the consequences of the character’s actions. Moreover, entire plot is centralized around what the character truly craves most at the present time. Consequently, with greed, characters are only evaluating the direct effects their actions. Since time is now unlimited, the main character, John, feels as if his life is one experiment after another revealing what will truly make him happy. And with death out of the question, the idea of a society, and basic moral principles cease to exist.
In Robert Herrick’s story, success is expressed in two forms. There is success in wealth and the other success is in happiness. A sacrifice of one must be done in order to accomplish the other. It is established early on that the protagonist, Edward Van Harrington, is very eager to earn his great fortunes in the city of Chicago and is willing to do anything to realize this dream. He gives up his morals and the path to happiness for the pursuit of wealth. Throughout the book, The Memoirs of an American Citizen, there is a constant dispute about ethical business
As a millennial caught in what was arguably one of the nation’s more drastic transitions, the knowledge about what is done differently awakens an awareness about how deeply the roots of pride in America have corrupted moral values and respect for humankind. The values of both “good” and “bad” capitalism, and to an extent, neo-liberalism – which is also extremely attractive to the public because of its principle of enabling friendly competition between businesses, which permits individuals practically unlimited levels of personal freedom, giving them the chance to create and expand businesses and achieve what, for decades, has been called “The American Dream”. On top of that, many academics have made a distinction between what they deem “good” and “bad” capitalism. ‘Good’ capitalism appears to be founded in nations of social democracy where “the social costs which businesses carry… enable them to function as social institutions without undermining the cohesion of the larger societies in which they operate.” In turn, these costs are compensated for through the
Civilization, as a whole, has progressed at an astounding rate since the first known colony was formed in Mesopotamia more than six thousand years ago. Technology and medicine being two of the main accomplishments of man kind. With all these advances and achievements, the question often arises, does human kind do it for survival or “incentives”, or does humankind do it for greed and “self-interest”.
Gordon Gekko said it best in the 1987 film Wall Street and again in its underrated sequel. The very word “Greed” conjures up images of fat cat executives who make a fortune exploiting the honest and hardworking middle class American people. It will make most people think of a tyrant with an all for one view on the world who do not care about anyone but themselves and will do anything to deepen their pockets while expanding their empire. The reality of this perception is no more accurate than the assumption that there is a way to place a label on middle class Americans. Greed is so skewed by misperception, social attitudes and general ignorance that it is almost never used as a positive term; rather, it is seen as mark of selfishness and poor moral performance. This is
Instead of shooting an arrow through twelve axe heads, we’ll often face the prospective trials of losing our jobs for speaking the truth. Instead of Odysseus’s plight of wandering for twenty years, we may find ourselves in Allan McDonald’s position of working 14 hours a day, 7 days a week for being on the side truth and honesty. In the same light that Odysseus sought peace for Ithaca, Allan McDonald sought to ensure that no man or woman would ever die on shuttle flight at the hands of corporate greed again.
Tonight was the night that Xavier Albarx proposed to the love of his life Katelyn Oxreed. Kately was everything that Xavier was looking in a woman beautiful, smart, caring, and most important of all she loved him with all of her heart. Xavier and Katelyn have been dating for six years and it was time to propose.
“If I don’t do it my way, it won’t feel right”, I said stubbornly as I writhed out of my fathers’ grasp. While this may sound like the demand of an obstinate child having a tantrum, I now recall it as one of the proudest thread of words I’ve ever strung together. It embodies my belief that the only worthwhile way of living, of justifying my existence, is by doing things my own way. As to the circumstances that warranted such a willful response from a five year old, I can provide a brief synopsis.
Positively diligent work and aspiration, in school and afterward in the financial commercial center, are the socially affirmed method for achievement, but on the other hand there's a component of profound respect even heroism for the drug dealer or crooked banker of Wall Street. They are willing to break the principles about moral means of earning success and choose to make progress by preying on others. In America, at the end of the day, achievement is presumably appraised significantly more profoundly than goodness (Chapter 7, Page
The ability to work hard to achieve and accomplish goals and dreams separates humans from other species. Work gives humans a purpose in life. Without work humans would never be able to live up to their full potential and never feel the satisfaction of achieving a difficult tasks or dreams through hard work and dedication. Capek wrote the character Alquist, the build/chief of construction of R.U.R., to symbolize the common working man. Throughout the book Alquist makes several argument against Domin 's beliefs which consisted of freeing humans of all work. His main goal was to “transform all of humanity into a worldwide aristocracy” (54) giving them the opportunity to live and enjoy life without the stress work brings to humanity. Although many humans may think and argue that life without work would relieve the human race from all stress and anxiety that work adds to humanity and would provide a generally happier life for all of humans, life without work would lead to humans ever being able to work to their full potential and dream causing more pain and sorrow than happiness. Work may bring stress and anxiety to human’s lives, but a little stress is generally a good thing. A life with no challenges or struggles ultimately goes against the principles Darwin set for humanity which includes his analysis of “the world [belonging] to the fittest.” (70) Allowing robots to progress more
In Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, he conveys the message that by being materialistic, people lose their worth in society. For example, when Happy is talking about the idealist personality of Biff, Biff bluntly says, “Why? You’re making money aren’t you?”
Wall Street presents a view of capitalism as being controlled by the few at the expense of the many—democracy versus the free market in Gekko’s words. He believes that democracy and the free market are, in fact, mutually exclusive. Stone fails to understand that the free market system works on the basis of supply and demand: for an individual to demand, they must first supply, irrespective of how greedy the said individual is, since the system is predominantly an exchange system. To Oliver stone, the idea of democratic socialism or democratic capitalism seems unreal and oxymoronic in nature. Wall Street 1987 poses as a satirical reflection of Oliver Stone’s bleak philosophy of economics portrayed by the use of themes like Greed and self indulgence
The growing inequalities in our society and individual’s motivation to work can be explained through different theoretical perspectives. This essay seeks to examine two theories, the functionalist perspective of social stratification and Max Weber’s perspective of rationalisation and life chances. The functionalist theory, in particular the discussions of different rewards system in our society and moral evaluations are applied in this paper, to explain people’s drives to work. Weber’s theory of social stratification, that of rationalisation and life chances is examined. In the first section of the paper, the differences and similarities of these theories’ understanding of people’s motivation to work are discussed. This will