The legal rights that are available to Jeff are extremely limited while being on Greensboro Coliseum premises. Jeff is a major fan of the University of North Carolina’s basketball program. He is such an avid fan that he decorated his car blue to show his support for his team. One day Jeff went to see the University of North Carolina Tar heels play against a rival school know as the Duke Blue devils. Jeff purchased a parking ticket with a disclaimer on it notifying people that any damages to personal property on Greensboro Coliseum premises is the risk of the owner. He assumed the risk of any damages that would occur to his car, while it is being parked in the Greensboro Coliseum parking lot. Jeff in this situation had created a Bailment for the Sole Benefit of the Bailor. Which is a …show more content…
The bailor in this situation is Jeff, who left his property (his car) on the Greensboro Coliseum parking lot. He also obtained a ticket that notifies individuals who parked on the premises that they are responsible for the damages of their personal property. In this situation Jeff doesn’t have much legal rights available to him. In conclusion, the only option Jeff has is to notify the proper authorities of what happen to his vehicle and wait to see if the individuals who caused he damages to his car are found. Jeff options are extremely limited due to the ticket he purchased saying the owners of the property assumes all the
(1) it was for jury to determine if store exercised reasonable care in performance of its duty to safeguard its business invitees from criminal acts of third persons;
This case is a good example of the “earnings game”. A dispute arose between the baseball team owners and the players association on the true profitability of the baseball business.
I spoke with Marlon about additional items in the vehicle the victims said should be in there. I asked if the items would still be in the vehicle. Marlon said “Probably not, but I didn’t take them” he said there was seven other persons in the vehicle at some point. Marlon was asked what time “he” parked the car on Copperstone Circle. He said between 10pm and midnight.
was just them. He told the it was them and the Van Daans. A couple days past till the police officer cam
continuing to park in their parking lot. The only person that could be held liable for the damages
The court reconvened, and the crown called the next person, Tim. B. Tim, a young white male, was already out on bail pending his charge of assaulting his ex-girlfriend. The Crown stated that this was a reverse-onus because he was charged with failure to appear three times. The duty counsel informed that Tim voluntarily turned himself in earlier in the morning when he found out about the charges, and that his father who owned property over $250,000 is willing to be his surety. The crown said she will consent to the release with a $1000 surety and conditions of non-contact with the victim and to reside with or residence approved by the surety. The duty counsel did not object and the Judge accepted the terms.
The only time a person may be held liable is if they do damage while on the property.
On 4/21/2017 at approximately 12:50 Hrs. I arrived in the area of 2103 Ave. I in reference to an assault. On arrival I observed a male subject later identified as Casey Durant. Durant was standing next to his electrician work vehicle that was parked on the side of the roadway. I observed the drivers side window had been broken.
The incident occurred in the northeast parking lot at the rear of 13 W. Hammond Street.
When Martin arrived at the restaurant, he handed over his car keys to the valet. Unknown to martin, he gave his car to a former employee named Benjamin who was dressed in a neatly pressed valet uniform but had resigned the previous day. In all bailment circumstances, the custodian of a property who is the bailee has a base duty to protect any property in his possession (Holmes, 1975). I believe that there was a bailment relationship between Martin and the Riverboat Bistro because Benjamin posed as an employee at the restaurant and this made Martin give him physical control of the Car due to the intent he showed to possess it. The management at Riverboat Bistro was negligent in their duty by not making sure that Benjamin had properly handed over all clothes and signs to the business after he resigned. The restaurant should have ensured that no illegal activity that can misinform customers was happening on their premises including the putting up of a sign that states “Valet parking available”. Since Benjamin was working for Riverboat Bistro and impersonated himself as such, Martin can proceed to on a legal suit of misrepresentation against the
Ms. Short was transported to Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility where she was cited for not wearing her seat belt and charged with Obstruction of Government Operations in addition to being served a Probation Revocation warrant. Mr. Minchue’s vehicle was towed and stored by Phillip’s Brother Wrecker
Upon my arrival, I spoke with the complainant Jerry McDonald. Mr. McDonald told me he went to town to runs some errands. When Mr. McDonald returned back to his residence he observed his Lincoln car was not at his residence, so he figure his wife had went to town in the car. Mr. McDonald told me when he walked inside his residence his wife was inside their residence. He asked his wife where the car was and she had thought Mr. McDonald had taken it to town. Mr. McDonald stated whoever stole his vehicle had to hot wire the vehicle because the keys were not in it. Mr. McDonald gave me the title
from defendant 's house. The officers left to obtain a warrant and eventually detained him.
I recovered the merchandise that was in the males possession and returned it to Griffith. I then advised both
the wheel of my vehicle. After my sentencing I was escorted to the booking room where