preview

Group Analysis Reflection

Better Essays

Introduction The purpose of this paper is to discuss with the reader a personal analysis reflecting group experience and perception of the team’s effectiveness to work together. Group Three discussed intraprofessional bullying in the work place. The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services defines bullying as “unwanted, aggressive behavior” (U.S. Department, 2016). This unwanted behavior may be repeated frequently often resulting in negatively lasting impacts on the individual (U.S. Department, 2016). Throughout the group one paper resolutions and outcomes were provided to the reader. Personal experience working with group three members was production. According to Lauren Elrick, “Unless you’re pursuing a career as a novelist or truck driver, …show more content…

Lunenburg states how there are four types of barriers; process barriers, physical barriers, semantic barriers, and psychosocial barriers (Lunenburg, 2010). Process barriers include sender barriers, encoding barriers, medium barriers, decoding barriers, receiving barriers and feedback barriers (Lunenburg, 2010). Physical barriers include “Any number of physical distractions can interfere with the effectiveness of communication, including a telephone call, drop-in visitors, distances between people, walls, and static on the radio” (Lunenburg, 2010). Semantic barriers are the words we use to express ourselves may hold multiple meaning and mean one thing to us but another to someone else (Lunenburg, 2010). Psychosocial barriers includes three concepts; “Fields of experience include people's backgrounds, perceptions, values, biases, needs, and expectations” (Lunenburg, 2010), “Filtering means that more often than not we see and hear what we are emotionally tuned in to see and hear” (Lunenburg, 2010), “psychological distance between people that is similar to actual physical distance” (Lunenburg, 2010). Barriers to success identified were conflicting schedules; group members were located in different geographical locations. Conflicting schedules with multiple group members is normal. Group three proved to overcome this barrier by clearly communicating and working as a team to achieve the overall outcome which was group success. Another barrier, different geographical locations of each member prevented meeting as a group in person to discuss the assignment in depth. However with clear communication and quick responses from each group member the team was able to work with unity to produce a strong paper and finish the assignment with

Get Access