Grown Up Research Paper

In today's society, there are many crimes going on. Adults are not the only ones that commit crimes. One issue today is that juvenile offenses and whether juvenile offenders should be tried as adults in criminal court. A common phrase that is often used in this case of young juveniles committing crimes is "Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time." This phrase should be cleared to people that juveniles are not adults, and with this being said it will not make them one. "It has redefined juvenile offenses by treating most of them as delinquent acts to be adjudicated within a separate juvenile justice system that is theoretically designed to recognize the special needs and immature status of young people and emphasize rehabilitation over punishment" (Steinberg). While juveniles should be responsible for their actions, and should be held accountable for the crime, then the juvenile justice system is design to determine the consequences. Youths are still minors and are less mature. They often face a lot of negative peer pressure. Therefore, juveniles should not be tried in courts as adults.

Typically viewed upon by stereotypes, assembled from occurrences and news releases in America’s history of gang violence, the law enforcement in the past has taken contentious action against gang suspects but, through observations, police force aggression has been perceived of being at a higher risk of causing resentment from adolescents when dealing with the suspected ‘members’. In fact, severe penalties such as detention have been associated with an increased likelihood of re-offending and a 2002 study showed that young people who went to a youth justice conference were 15-20% less likely to re-offend than young people who went to court for similar offence. A report released by the NSW Ombudsman in 1999 showed that young people are far more likely than adults to be searched and moved on by police. Many organisations, like OxGang Research Network, and other directed projects, such as the Youth Gang: the Australian Experience project, have made it their goal to ‘study’ the behaviours and

Dorm life at Graceland University includes rooms that are roughly 12ft x 10ft in dimension with two twin size beds, two dressers, two desks, one small closet and above storage space. We have bathrooms per floor including 3-8 toilets, sinks, and showers. Now this description is only for the Tess Morgan building, Walker Hall includes, to my knowledge, much bigger rooms with two twin beds, two dressers, two desks, and two wardrobes and a personal sink. Every hall also includes two bathrooms per hall with about 3 toilets, sinks, and showers for each. The biggest differences between Tess Morgan and Walker is that Walker is only home to two halls of women, compared to Tess Morgan which is home to seven halls, Walker also has an elevator and air

Ms. Cooney English CP10 23 March 2018 Kierra Davis Treating a juvenile as and adult One day this kid stabbed another kid in his arm, he has been sent to the juvenile hall and they were deciding on if they want to try him as an adult because of the situation and he could have really hurt the other kid bad. Have you ever thought about the federal system and if they should treat juveniles as adults or should not treat juveniles as adults? The sentencing of a juvenile offender should not be treated as an adult in many ways, one way is because children should not get the same treatment as adults, the second reason is that it’s also not right to the children to be treated that way, and lastly both jail systems are not alike at all. Juveniles

It is being argued if youths should be charged as adults throughout a heinous crime. It is said that kids brain development hasn’t fully grown to it’s full potential such as adults and by that they don’t know from right and wrong. Also, another argument brought up was the age of teens being prosecuted in adult courts. But if you do the crime, shouldn’t you do the time? From my point of view, teens should be prosecuted in the adult justice system.

Juvenile Justice Argumentative Response: Why are children only considered adults when committing crimes? Widely perceived by people in America, many feel juveniles should be held accountable for their actions and be tried as adults. Other people feel strongly that given juveniles' age and ongoing brain development, they should be offered reasonable punishment instead of solely being tried as adults. Treating children as adults is simply unfair. Despite the adult nature of the crimes, juvenile criminals should be treated as minors in the criminal justice system because of the brain's inability to understand their actions because of existing brain development in comparison to adults, juveniles should instead be offered rehabilitation and resources.

In the article Kids are Kids it states that “adolescents squeezed through the adult system are more likely to come out as violent career criminals than similar kids handled on the juvenile side”. This means that by getting treated like adults they are seeing and getting involved with more violent people. Teenagers grow up, and become the people they are in life, based on how they grew up. There are also others that believe that these juveniles should be able to be convicted as adults, if they are able to commit adult crimes.

This question has caused a number of debates between scholars, law makers, psychiatrists and laypeople. When the juvenile justice system was created over a hundred years ago, it was because the lawmakers at the time decided that children should not be tried as adults because their lack of maturity meant that they should not be held to the same standards as adults (The National Academies Press, n.d.). This meant that children under the age of 12 were unlikely to be charged with a crime as they were seen not to be accountable for their actions. However, as the number of crimes that juveniles were committing along with their severity increased, it became necessary for the courts and lawmakers to institute stricter punishments for juvenile offenders. The problem with sentencing children as adults is that they will not be rehabilitated.

To the degree that flexibility is likely, moving adolescents into a criminal equity framework that blocks a rehabilitative reaction may not be extremely sensible open approach. Be that as it may, to the degree that young people's agreeability is restricted; their exchange to the grown-up framework is less troubling. At long last, pre-adulthood is a developmental period amid which various formative directions turn out to be solidly settled and progressively hard to adjust. Numerous juvenile encounters have a huge combined sway. Awful choices or inadequately figured approaches relating to adolescent crimes may have unexpected and hurtful results that are difficult to fix. It is not out of the question to ask whether or for what valid reason

In the United States, “an estimated 7,100 juvenile defendants were charged with felonies in adult criminal court in 1998” ("Juvenile Defendants"). These numbers portray how there were a lot of juveniles being charged. In addition to a large increase in the amount of crime, there was a change in the severity of the crimes that were committed, “the number of violent crimes committed by young people declined substantially from the 1990s to 2003, but then surged again that year, with the estimated number of juvenile murder offenders increasing 30 percent” (Kahn). These numbers show how juveniles were committing more crimes that were serious in the face of the law. These numbers are a brief snippet of

“I think it's important for us as a society to remember that the youth within juvenile justice systems are, most of the time, youths who simply haven't had the right mentors and supporters around them because of circumstances beyond their control,” (qtd. in Brainy Quotes) are wise words from Q'orianka Kilcher, a human rights activist. Many Americans feel adolescents should be held accountable for their behavior; however, trying them as if they are adults is not always the optimum course of action. Because the teenage brain matures from back to front, the prefrontal cortex is not established until mid-twenties. Ordinarily adolescents can be rehabilitated in order to avert future offending; yet when tried as an adult, all hope for rehabilitation is lost. A one time mistake will follow an adolescent around for the rest of his/her life, dramatically decreasing the opportunities for success. Trying adolescents as adults is an injustice due to their lack of rationality and potential for rehabilitation.

Juveniles know right from wrong at that age and are old enough to know the consequences. At that age, juveniles know that touching others inappropriately without the person's permission is not acceptable and that weapons are not to be taken as a joke due to the harm that can be done. When having the right to a trial by jury and not just by a judge, this allows the juveniles to have the official fair trial. Which then it could lead to crime rates from teens to go down

Juvenile street gangs are expanding, and evolving into crime that has not been linked to gangs in the past, according to the FBI. While they expand into white-collar type crimes like counterfeiting, identity theft and mortgage fraud, they also continue to be involved in illegal activities that they are more well known for, such as drug sales, recruiting new members, violent turf wars, and prostitution, the FBI reports. The number of active street gangs (including gangs in prisons) is around 33,000, and membership in those 33,000 is estimated to be about 1.4 million, the FBI reports. This paper delves into the scholarly literature available about gangs, and for the most part this paper focuses on juvenile gangs albeit some of the data may also include gangs that include older individuals. This paper focuses on gang members' relationships with adults, their interactions with counselors in schools, risk factors associated with gang membership, weapon-related issues and other matters connected to juvenile gangs.

In my own opinion, I consider juveniles as immature because they lack the ability to recognize the long term impact of their actions as they have decreased levels of responsibility. Therefore, the justice system should not charge juveniles in adult legal system and sentence them as adults.Trying juveniles as adults exposes the young offenders to state penitentiaries up to life in prison without parole and even sentenced to death. This raises a question on how truly effective treating juveniles as adults are to the young offenders. As the crimes committed by juveniles increase, there has been an outcry from the public and affected to prosecute juveniles accused of serious crimes as adults. It is true that juveniles do

For this paper, I had the privilege of interviewing one of my friend’s grandmother. Her name is Jamie Hansen and she is a healthy and active 68-year-old grandmother. In the beginning of the phone call, I asked some basic background knowledge questions such as how many grandkids she has and if she was a widower or not. I found out that she and her husband are happily married and that she has six grandchildren. As I got to know her more I started asking questions that pertained to the interview aspect of social theories. I figured out that Mrs. Hansen’s responses led to an application of the continuity and socioemotional selective theories.