This is the second complaint submitted by M. Rocha received by Guild Mortgage Company (“Guild”).The first complaint was submitted on June 22, 2016. Guild provided its response to the First Complaint on August 05, 2016. For your reference, Guild’s response to the First Complaint is enclosed herein. This letter is in response to the emailed received by your office on September 14, 2016, in relation to the above-mentioned borrower. Thank you for the opportunity to review and address your concerns. The Mr. Rocha’s correspondence states he was preapproved for a loan product that he did not qualify for. He also expressed concern regarding the waiting period for 30 days prior to receiving notification he did not qualify; afterward being offered another loan product with a higher interest rate and a higher down payment. …show more content…
The loan application was submitted to Guild on 03/31/2016. On 05/16/2016, the loan officer communicated to Mr. Rocha through email, the investor had not approved the loan. However, the loan officer advised him that there were alternative loan options available. The he responded to the loan officer’s email the same day and informed the loan officer that he would like to proceed with the loan option for the 80-10-10 program (see attached email). The loan was then relocked on 5/19/2016 and on 05/20/2016, the borrower was sent a Loan Estimate for his 2nd mortgage which he signed and acknowledged. On 05/21/2016, he was emailed a Closing Disclosure for his 1st mortgage and mailed a Change in Circumstance letter (see attached). Upon your receipt and acknowledgment of the above-mentioned documents, the loan was approved by underwriting on
As on Yelp, individuals are complaining out the service they receive after their mortgage being sold to 21st Mortgage.
to be approved for a mortgage. Some of these home owners may have walked away from their
LOAN PACKAGE Collateral - Schedule A, Form 413: Personal Financial Statement, Form 912: Statement of
Had I not been misinformed and read your e-mail that arrived on July 11th the documents would still not have been ready to sign on Friday. I would have reviewed the file and typed the necessary loan documents. Depending on what else I was working on in the course of my Job I would have had them ready on Wednesday or Thursday (same day they were ready). At this point David Stalheim would have received them for review. Once I got them back I would have routed them to the Legal, Mayor and Finance department for signatures. I would not have received them back (best case scenario) until Wednesday August 12th. This is something that I tried to explain to you earlier in the week.
The other options for Eckwood would be to ask for collaterals, and higher interest payments. Moreover, he could provide this loan to other industries, or even other companies, those posses higher rates of return. Or he could even reject the petition.
On October 9, 2015, a subpoena was sent by Office of the Bar Counsel to JP Morgan Chase to officially determine who the mortgagor is for Chase Home Finance Loan number 1991796965. Additionally, Solomon has until October 23, 2015, to respond to bar counsel’s inquiry regarding his cash deposit of $16,860. Based on the evidence already obtained, bar counsel believes there is sufficient evidence to file a Petition for Discipline.
Ocwen, the borrowers David and Linda Beach built a house in Florida in 1986 by securing an $85,000 construction loan from Fidelity Savings Bank of Florida. Later that same year, they refinanced their house through Great Western Bank. Five years later, in 1991, they stopped making payments on their mortgage, and the next year the bank initiated a foreclosing proceeding. At that time, the Beaches raised the defenses found in §§ 1635 and 1640. The Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida rejected the Beaches’s defense of rescission because their right to rescission expired in 1989, when the three-year period of § 1635(f) had lapsed. The appellate court affirmed this decision, as well as the Supreme Court of Florida. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine “whether under federal law the statutory right of rescission provided by § 1635 may be revived as an affirmative defense after its expiration under
new $8 million mortgage at a 6.5% interest rate had been arranged. The term was 10 years with
The Borrower and the Lender are, in good faith, entering into this Agreement and a contemporaneous Security Agreement, dated as above. The Debtors are entering into this Loan Agreement for the sum of $1,500,000.00 to be rendered by the Lender in the form a cashier’s check at the time of signing. The loan is compelled by the ample consideration provided in the corresponding Security Agreement. Both of these Agreements may be modified, amended, or supplemented from time to time throughout the natural course of the Agreements.
Attached is the letter to Nick Johnson regarding the health insurance coverage and Havasu loan. In the letter we’re suggesting court time for Nick’s violation of the judgment if he does not agree to reimburse you for the costs incurred due to his violation. In the event that Nick does not agree to your terms, would you like to bring this matter to a judge? Please review the letter and if you have any questions, feel free to contact the
In closing, I do appreciate the time taken to review my case. I am opptumistic that a positive result can be reached for these loans, with the hopes of being refunded the money which was applied for these loans from my tax return so that I can use them for my two children and family matters, with hopes of being discharged with the possiblitiy of attending an accredited institution to obtain a worthy
Once the Escrow Department has verified the escrow account, review the loan to ensure the information is correct before sending a response. If the escrow was determined to be correct, state the reason. If it was determined escrow was incorrect, state what was incorrect and what has been done to correct it. Send the letter with the appropriate Template Letter.
2).Important Notice to Borrowers Related to Your Reverse Mortgage- This disclosure must be provided to the Borrower no later
As Jackie Patrick, loans officer for the Commercial Bank of Ontario, the key issue is whether or not I will accept or reject Mackay’s request for a bank loan and line of credit. My key objective is to develop a thorough understanding of the facts presented in the case in order to make an informed decision that will best serve the interest of the Commercial Bank of Ontario, myself as the newly appointed loans officer, and of course my client Mr. Mackay.
This essay will consider the rights and remedies of both parties in a mortgage agreement where there has been default of payment. Furthermore, it will be concluded by taking a stand on whether further restriction needs to be placed on the right of he mortgagee.