preview

Guilty Legal Theory

Better Essays

Sheridan King
Brandeis University
Legal Theory
To Deter Adult Sexual Assault Through Castration of the Guilty I will advance the thesis that lawmakers must create new sentencing guidelines regarding adult sexual assault offences. The results of the high level of accuracy computer created in conjunction with the Department of Justice, Google’s Special Project, and the Rand Corporation found that the best way to deter adult sexual assault is to castrate those found guilty. Therefore, by saying the lawmakers must create new sentencing guidelines, I mean that, the results of the high level of accuracy machine conclude valuable information that lawmakers must consider for the welfare of society, which is the primary duty of lawmakers. I have three …show more content…

Hart distinguishes three justificatory issues revolving the application of punishment. Firstly, the general justifying aim of a system of punishment is to determine the justification of creating and maintaining a system of punishments (Hart 1959, pg. 9). Hart defines this as “the application of the pains of punishment to an offender who is morally guilty,” which he later labels as “Retribution as a General Justifying Aim. Secondly, “retribution in Distribution” distinguishes who can properly be punished (Hart 1959, pg. 9). “Retribution in Distribution”, thus, can be defined as the insistence in which only those who have broken the law voluntarily may be punished (Hart 1959, pg. 9). Thirdly, Hart approaches the matter of determining the appropriate amount of punishment, which deals with defining the severity and methods of punishment (Hart 1959, pg. 9). Given these clarifications, I will not proceed to defending my …show more content…

1997. A Reply to van den Haag. The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies. Oxford University Press.

Davis, Michael. 1990. The Death penalty, Civilization, and Inhumanness. Social Theory and Practice 16, no. 2: 245-59.

Greenfeld, Lawrence A. 1997. Sex Offenses and Offenders An Analysis of Data on Rape and Sexual Assault. Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Hart H.L.A. 1959. The Presidential Address: Prolegomenon to the Principle of Punishment. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series 60: 1-27.

Honderich, Ted. 1969. Punishment: The Supposed Justifications. New York: Harcout, Brace & World, Inc.

Reiman, Jeffrey. 1990. The Death Penalty, Deterrence, and Horribleness: Reply to Michael Davis. Social Theory and Practice 16, no. 2: 261-72.

Van Den Haag. 1997. The Death Penalty Once More. The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies. Oxford University Press.

Zimring, Franklin, and Gordon Hawkins. 1973. Deterrence The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago

Get Access