Gun Control In Wales Vs Usa Essay

I want to compare the US to some nations that are very similar and culture and beliefs. To start I want to compare it to the UK(England and Wales). Culturally we're very similar having originally come from England. And the United Kingdom having possession of an automatic firearm sending out a firearm or a handgun is prohibited. They have tried to make it as hard as possible for anyone to possess a firearm with hours of paperwork and third-party references required. This is a result of a massacre that happened in 1987 resulting in 16 people dead and another nine years later after school shooting took the lives of 16 children and their teacher. with all of the strict laws their homicide rate lies around 1.1 per 100,000. This is compared to about 5 per 100,000 in the US from Senate call University. To counter that argument the UK has a higher robbery rate then in the US, this could be due to the fact that store owners have no way to protect themselves. Another alarming statistic is that the UK has higher sexual violence rate than the US. This is surprising thing that the US

Did you know that in the United States almost 100,000 people are shot or killed with a gun in one year? 10,527 people die a year in handgun related incidents in the United States. This number, by far, outweighs the number of gun related deaths in countries such as Sweden, Great Britain, and Japan, which number 13, 22, and 87, respectively. What is the reason for such drastic differences in numbers? Sweden, Great Britain, and Japan are all countries that have stricter gun control laws than the US. Mind you, these are just the number of deaths caused by handgun related incidents; however, that isn’t counting the thousands of deaths caused by other types of firearms; in one year, around 30,000 Americans die in gun violence.

Gun violence in America is prevalent as the rate of deaths rise. Stricter gun control laws should be made and enforced to lower those rates and create a safer country. The Gun Violence Archive reports that overall, the total number of gun related incidents has reached 36,719 in 2015 and that there have been 244 mass shootings so far. The death toll has reached 9,210 and 18,817 victims were injured by guns. Other countries with stricter gun control laws have reported less crimes and deaths dealing with guns, and America should follow suit. In Australia, after massacre in 1996, stricter gun control laws were passed and since then, there have been less gun related crimes. According to a study made by Andrew Leigh of Australian National University

From the Vox article about Gun control in America, I conceive that declining the amount of gun usage would not going to decrease the gun violence in United States. Gun violence includes many other cruelty such as addictive substances, mental disorders, suicide and homicide. In United States homicides of firearms are on high peak (based on the chart that provided by the Vox website) other countries like Canada and Sweden has six and seven times less homicide rates compare to United States. Germany has sixteen times less homicides compare to America. It is unbelievable for me, because I didn’t have knowledge about this before. It is shocking to see that this problems is increasing every day and we are not acting on it. Our politicians say a lot

The United States outcompetes all other developed nations as having the highest firearm homicide rate as well as the highest

Gun related deaths are among the highest cause of homicide. Gun violence has taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. Australia, however, is a country with little to none gun related incidents. After an event in 1996, John Howard created a gun reform, and gun-related homicide dropped drastically, compared to other countries worldwide. Mass shooting has become a frequently talked about subject on the news and social media. Some countries that has “rights to keep and bear arms” should consider having gun control--like Australia--to prevent future disasters.

Lemieux found that there is significant evidence that “mass shootings and gun ownership rates are highly correlated… and that this association remains high even when the number of incidents from that United States is withdrawn from the analysis,” (Lemieux 82). This quote emphasizes the point that the number of guns in a community has a direct relationship with the amount of mass shootings that occurs in a certain area. The United States has a leniency in gun policies that allow for there to be an astronomical number of mass shootings every decade. If the United States were to model the gun laws after some of the other countries in the world there could be a higher chance of the mass shooting rate going down. Such countries as “Australia [have] not experienced a mass shooting since 1996 when it implemented more rigorous gun policies in response to the Port Arthur massacre,” (Mata 174). Australia isn’t the only country whose gun policies have kept mass shootings from filling the gun records; Mata’s research has uncovered that Great Britain and Switzerland have also shown positive progress. Countries other than the United

Violent crime is a problem in the nations of Great Britain and Australia despite very stringent gun-control laws. In

The US Government has created laws to maintain some sort of control over gun ownership, but in no way do they reduce or prevent gun-related injuries, murders, or homicides. A negative correlation exists between crimes and gun ownership in countries internationally, according to a study done by Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy. Which is basically saying that the more guns the citizens own, a larger drop in crime will take place. A study that took place in the United Kingdom, known as “the most violent country in the European Union”, showed that the number of violent attacks rose by 77% in the decade following the banning of

40% of the homes in the US own guns. Since 2006 in Virginia, guns sales have increased by 73% and violent crimes with guns have gone down 27%. For example, obtaining a gun in Sandpoint, North Idaho, is very easy and there are almost no gun related deaths in Bonner County. Yet, in Chicago and Washington D.C., they have strict gun control laws and a high crime rate.

According to The Brady Campaign to Prevent Violence, the gun homicide rate per person in the United States is 20 times higher than the combined rate of 22 countries with similar wealth and population. In 2013, there were 9,484 gun-related deaths in the United States but only 200 in Canada, 194 in Germany, 35 in Australia, and 39 in England and Wales. This proves that tougher gun control laws can reduce the number of people murdered.

Murder, a crime which has been illegal in nearly all societies throughout the history of man including the U.S has immensely lucid laws written against it. This law prevents many people from committing murder, however mass shootings still occur despite this law. Why would more laws preventing such crimes stop them? Whenever there is news of a mass shooting or shooting incident, gun laws are always the first thing to be blamed by the media. Saying increasing gun laws and banning assault rifles would stop all these crimes is an overstretch. These people fail to realize that statistics have shown more gun laws would not stop shootings. Making guns illegal would not reduce mass shootings, due to the majority of shootings taking place in gun free zones, it will only stop law abiding citizens from obtaining guns, and thus endanger people more.

A study was conducted at Harvard University by American lawyer Don B. Kates, and criminologist Gary Mauser, a professor at Simon Fraser University. Together they wrote a journal entitled “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” which includes statistics and evidence regarding the correlation between high rates of gun violence and high gun ownership. According to their research, it says “Denmark has roughly half the gun ownership rate of Norway, but a 50% higher murder rate (Kates and Mauser 670).” More evidence was concluded by this journal; it states that Russia has one ninth the gun ownership of Norway, and the murder rate is 2500% higher (Kates and Mauser, 671). These statistics show the negative effects of low rates of gun ownership in foreign countries. In the United States, cities such as Chicago have seen a dramatic increase in gun violence. In 2016 alone, Chicago has experienced a 91% increase in homicides committed with a firearm (Awr Hawkins and Chicago Tribune). According to the NRA, concealed carry laws in Chicago are very strict, and the idea that gun laws are very loose is false (NRA-ILA). On the contrary, in Texas, a citizen can legally concealed carry and have no waiting period if they choose to purchase a gun (Texas Gun Laws), and it considered is one of the safest states in the United States (Tucker Carlson).

They also took a survey in Canada and only and estimated 5% of households had guns. They say that the much higher prevalence of owning a gun might explain why crimes are much less in the US. (Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology. Aug99, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p389-408. 20p. 3 Charts, 4 Maps.) Proving that the crime rate drop is not due to gun control laws beings a country that has more guns has a lower crime rate than a country with less guns.

We begin with one of the biggest misconceptions on how more gun control actually affects both the United States and other countries. It may seem odd at first but stats and data about other countries and cities in the United States prove that the more gun laws and regulations they have, the more gun homicides there are in the area. The United States has the highest gun ownership percentage than any other country at 1.45 guns per person but our homicide rate is 103rd in the world at only 3.6 per 100,000 residents. Credit Data taken from the years 1994-2014 shows that American gun ownership rates have increased from .94 to 1.45 respectively and that gun homicide rates have greatly decreased during the same time period from 7.0 to 3.6 per 100,000 people. Credit