Gun Control
Gun control has been debated quite a bit over the last couple of years due to recent domestic terrorist attacks. These attacks have caused political views on gun control to waver, regardless of our Second Amendment rights. Sociologist would see gun control as a way to divide our country by our belief. For example, a conservative would stand firm with their belief in the Second Amendment, where as a liberal would demolish those rights in an instant, if given the opportunity. The issue with gun control is that the government makes it more difficult for citizens to buy guns for protection, when criminals would just steal a legal gun and kill someone if necessary. So the main purpose of gun control is not to take all the guns away.
…show more content…
Each gun related incident that occurs in the United States is recorded and factors in to the major decision of removing all guns from citizens. It has been estimated that economically, the cost of gun violence is on the border of $100,000 billion per year. In 2002, 71.1% of murders, 42% of robberies, and 19% of aggravated assaults committed in the United States, involved firearms. In 2001, nearly 30,000 Americans died as a direct result of gun fire. (Chemerinsk. 477-485.) These statistics factor into the limits and restrictions given to individuals of this country. Conditions of our right to bear arms should remain free enough for us to be able to protect ourselves from being overthrown by our government, but not without guidelines and regulations for us to follow in order to have those rights in a functional society. (Chemerinsk. …show more content…
They would first begin with looking at how certain regulations could benefit society. If a society has no rules against guns, there could potentially be far more gun crimes, this is a dysfunction. (Culley et. al. 2011.) Removing all rules would cause mass chaos in all aspects and would make normal life impossible to attain. So a functional society would need to create rules, but they must not make them too strict. (Culley et. al. 2011.) To create harsh conditions and punishments for their citizens, would make individuals resent their government and no longer respect the way they run their country. So, structural functionalists would want to create a society with some guidelines to protect individual rights, while keeping the people as safe as possible. One might say the task is impossible, but it is not if we look at the dysfunctions behind firearms, we can figure out how gun control can properly function in society. (Culley et. al.
The United States has 88.8 guns per 100 people, or about 270,000,000 guns, which is the highest total and per capital number in the world. 22% of Americans own one or more guns (35% of men and 12% of women). America's pervasive gun culture stems in part from its colonial history, revolutionary roots, frontier expansion, and the Second Amendment, which states: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control laws state that the Second Amendment was intended for militias; that gun violence would be reduced; that gun restrictions have always existed; and that a majority of Americans, including gun owners, support new gun restrictions.
You’re in your house and someone breaks in. Oh no, gun control laws said you can’t have a gun! You have no protection, so you’re dead within seconds. This is why the U.S. does not need tougher gun control laws. We need guns for protection, we should have the right to conceal one at all times, and the second amendment says we can have a firearm.
The argument in this article is President Trump signaled support for one piece of gun control legislation on Monday, five days after a mass shooting at a Florida high school left 17 people dead and scores injured. "The president is supportive of efforts to improve the federal background check system," Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the White House press secretary, wrote in a statement Monday morning. After a mass shooting in Las Vegas last year, officials said they were studying a ban on bump stocks, an attachment that allows a rifle to fire more frequently. Over the weekend at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump weighed gun control measures in conversations with friends, according to people who spoke to him. Trump has faced two of the country's
The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. Liberals are looking to amend the constitution any way they can. They want to ban handguns or at least restrict sales. Studies have shown that gun control cannot stop people from committing the crime.
Gun Control has been a controversial issue in the United States for a long period of time. There are two sides to this debate, the pro-gun lobbyist who believe they should have the right to exercise the 2nd Amendment right which states that the Federal Government does not have the right to infringe the people from keeping and carrying a firearm. The Anti-gun lobbyist wants stricter run regulation or even ban gun sales all together. This essay will be analyzing the laws regarding gun regulations through the history of the United States. The essay will also look into the 2nd Amendment rights while also giving it a definition. This essay will also be analyzing some of the more important Supreme Court cases in which the ruling of the Supreme Court
Gun Control has been a long debated, and hot topic among the American population for many decades. The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution states that, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Both sides of this debate have very logical arguments for increasing gun control or lessening gun control. These arguments tend to spike shortly after active shooter events, eventually having some type of legislature passed to prevent these atrocious acts from happening. But ultimately active shooter events continue to plague the United States, and much of the world.
In the world today, we often hear about the gun control debate. There are two main, obvious sides in the debate, to enforce more rules for gun control or to leave things the way they are. I believe in the Second Amendment right to bear arms given to all citizens of the United States by the Constitution.
In 2014 of the 42,820 suicides reported that year 21,386 involved a firearm (mel.org). Shootings on campus raise the question of whether properly trained students carrying firearms. The debate over gun control has two sides one is that people should have guns for many reasons like it is the second amendment and to protect themselves. The other side is that people shouldn't have guns because they can't be trusted with them.
Should gun control laws be implemented or not? The United States has about 90 guns per 100 people, or about 300,000,000 guns, which is the highest number in the world. Gun control laws should be enacted but there are more cons then pros about the gun control act of the government.
The gun control debates have been a polarizing issue as people have different stands concerning the policies that guide the gun control (Spitzer, Robert J, 30). Guns are used for self-defense. It is illogic to prevent law-abiding citizen from acquiring guns while criminals have them illegally. Handguns are small and thus can be carried anywhere for self-defense (Lott, John R. 13). Therefore, they are the weapons of choice for the individuals who wish to use it for self-defense. Unfortunately, they can be the weapon of choice for criminals too (Xia, Yuanqing, 2299). Since the handguns are small, thieves can also secretly use them to instill fear to others and steal from them. Since criminals are humans who claim to need security, they are also likely to acquire guns as per the regulations of gun control. Gun control would definitely lead to higher levels of crimes.
With mass shootings on the rise, street violence killing by the thousands, and suicide victims climbing as well, gun control laws have been a hot topic in today’s media. There are many state laws and a federal amendment that pertain to firearms. These laws try to restrict and regulate the sale, purchase, and possession of firearms through licensing, registration, and identification requirements (US. Legal, Inc.). These laws are in place to protect people who own or do not own guns from those who would be the most dangerous when in possession of one. However, there are large loopholes in these laws that allow people to get a gun without facing any of the laws’ requirements. It is these loopholes that give people whom wish to harm or kill other, the ability to purchase a firearm when otherwise they would have been prohibited. Stricter and more thorough firearm-related laws need to be put into place, so that previous loopholes will be eliminated.
On January 5th, 2016, an emotional President Obama broke down in tears as he introduced new gun control executive orders. He was clearly upset at the amount of innocent people whose lives had ended by being shot. The image of his emotions made many Americans realize: are our current laws not enough? Although gun violence has been on a steady decline for the last few decades, the U.S. is still the global leader in gun violence and ownership, according to U.S. News(McPhillips). Some people do not like that title associated with their country, so they push for gun control laws. Ideally, the best way to end gun violence is to abolish the 2nd Amendment, and illegalize guns. However, that would be an unheralded task. Banning guns would be impossible.
Gun Control is a debatable method to reduce gun violence and many people's perspectives vary. “Gun control is a broad term that covers many kinds of restrictions. It can include regulations about what firearms can be bought and sold and who can and can’t possess them or sell them and also the ammunition that you have to buy” (New York Times). However, Gun Control is a horrific method to resolve Gun Violence this opinion has been proven by numerous professionals. Gun Control didn't work in other countries, People that shouldn't possess guns will still have access to them, and Guns break the second amendment and violent people's sense of safety.
A famous quote by an artist name Philip Cook once said “ If you introduce a gun into a violent encounter, it increases the chance that someone will die.”(P.C.) As well as he further stated that there are “Only 80,000 to 82,000 defensive uses of guns during assaults, robberies, and household burglaries.”(P.C.)In a survey that was said that "Private firearms may be used in self defense with up to two and a half million times each year, with approximately 400,000 of those defenders believing that using a gun at the time of them doing self defense certainly saved a life".( U.C.)
| Gun Control: Pros (i) Disarm and Control Citizens (ii) Better Management (iii) Reduce Crime Rate and Death Rate