preview

Heraclitus And Parmenide : The Fundamental Character Of Change

Decent Essays

Heraclitus and Parmenides were both obsessed with change, which fits into each of their philosophical systems. Heraclitus and Parmenides both agreed that everything we see in the world is a transformation, and that the fact that everything in the universe can be broken down to one fundamental thing, whatever that thing is, they did not agree on however. Heraclitus argued that the fundamental character of reality is change itself. He said that everything is in process and is changing. “One cannot step twice into the same river, since it is endlessly flowing, changing, moving with fresh waters. This is a good example of his argument on change, because of the dynamic system that everything Is constantly changing, nature flows onwards like a river, even the nature of the flow changes. The only constant thing in the world is change. If the waters would stop and not flow it would not be a river, without change there would be no world. Heraclitus denied that anything can stay the same, and be identical with whatever that thing is or will be. Parmenides would argue that permanence is the fundamental character of reality, and that everyone’s reality is single, permanent and unchanging. His argument is “how can a thing change into something else? How can it be and not be what it is?” It seems like he would think of change more of an illusion that an individual in their own version of their reality would think, and not what would actually happen. Parmenides says that “change is mere

Get Access