Hippocratic Oath

Although the Hippocratic Oath is generally upheld within modern medicinal practices, in many cases people of different culture or socioeconomic statuses are not treated to the level they are due; therefore, there is an inequity of care within the US, contradicting the oath that professionals claim to abide by.

In the article “The Hippocratic Oath of the Manger: Good or Bad Idea? ” Sean Jasso suggests that a manager is not necessary requires a professional license to practice management neither takes oaths. However, he believes that it is normal for medical doctors, lawyers, and CPAs to take the oath. The idea about whether the Hippocratic oath of manager is good or bad still stay controversial because some believe that having a professional license to practice management will minimize the failure in business. On the other side, some believes that as long as manager produce effective result within the rule of law then oath is irrelevant or not helpful. For example, Harvard Business School Scholars takes the “MBA Oath”, which was inspired by the professor Rakesh Khurana and Nitin Nohria. The example of Harvard School of Business shows readers that the business crisis could be prevent or improve by turning management to a profession like law and medicine because these professions have to take oath: not to do harm to the society and people. Although Rakesh Khurana and Nitin Nohria’s ideas of “MBA Oath” is noble, Jasso believes that it is not realistic in our society.

Although all honorable doctors do their best to uphold the Hippocratic Oath, doctors unwittingly go against it when they emotionally detach themselves from their patients; therefore, they create unintended harm.

The Hippocratic oath (document4) is an oath all doctors take to this day. It is a pledge that all doctors take to promise that they intend on giving their patients the greatest care possible. The oath asks doctors to vow that they will be honest and confidential with their patients “I will apply dietetic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgment; I will keep them from harm and injustice. I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it nor will I make a suggestion to this effect… Whatever houses I may visit, I will come for the benefit of the sick, remaining free of all intentional injustice….

The Hippocratic Oath, is “First, do no harm”. Being a doctor is a profession solely dedicated to helping others, but what about when helping hurts? Often times the doctor doesn’t fully understand the patient due to a language or cultural barrier. A misunderstanding between the doctor and the patient can cause the patient to mistrust and discount everything the doctor says. The only thing worse than a noncompliant patient is a seemingly compliant patient. Although the western medical system has proven to be effective in its precision and accuracy, it is only as effective as the patients that make up the system.

In general, contemporary physicians are primarily trained to be competent in the field of medicine, from diagnosing their patients to prescribing therapy. Yet, they are not heavily taught medical ethics during their schooling: how should physicians conduct themselves around their patients? Nevertheless, medical traditions in China and Greece were thoroughly concerned about this question, which led to several of texts. In particular, the Greek developed an oath, known as the Hippocratic Oath, which were historically taken by physicians to essentially do no harm, while a Tang physician, Sun Simiao, wrote a text, “On the absolute sincerity of great physicians” that explained how physicians should behave around their patients. These two texts share a few comparable ideas on medical ethics, including compassion and competency. They also have dissimilarities since the Hippocratic Oath incorporated religion to medical ethics while the Sun Simiao incorporated philosophical principles, such as Confucian and Buddhist principles, to medical ethics.

1. Attention Material: The Hippocratic Oath proclaims “I will keep the sick from harm and injustice. I will

The Hippocratic Oath and Engineering code of ethics have both been regarded as the standard for medical and engineering professionals to conduct themselves morally, and professionally to assure that the decisions and activities made are guided by certain principles and values. (Hendon and French, 2016) Both the Hippocratic Oath and Engineering code of ethics emphasize the importance of the duties and responsibilities of professionals in regards to the safety and health of humans, providing services within areas of expertise, being truthful, hold confidential information, and being accountable for professional services provided.

Throughout the history of medicine there has always been a need for shared commitment to ideals of moral, ethical and humane practice. The Hippocratic Oath, created by a compilation of works largely based on Hippocrates, has always stood as guidelines for the conduct of physicians. The Classical oath has and continues to serve well in preserving the sanctity of the medical profession while developing a basis for the respectful treatment of patients. However, this out-dated oath is not equipped to handle the modern trials and tribulations faced by physicians and health care in general. Many of its principles are simply unrealistic and inapplicable in today’s society. For this reason a revised version of the oath was written. As I will

The Hippocratic oath is a set of standards that all doctors sign, used for millennium to ensure proper care by physicians. In the original form, it guarded the sanctity of human life with the utmost importance, barring physicians from taking a human life. It states “I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody who asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy. In purity and holiness I will guard my life and my art.” Through the passing of time, however, this oath began to reflect a liberal approach on the sanctity of human life. Many Christians now sign a modified version of the Hippocratic oath that gives physicians the power to save and take life. In a Christian context,

A doctor takes an oath that he or she will do everything in their power to keep a patient alive. But they also take an oath that they will do whatever is in the best interest of their patient.

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath taken by any medical care professional to ensure the protection of all life, the holding of one's teachings in the highest regards, the recognizing of one's limitations, and the renouncement of self-interest in the treatment of patients. The significance of the Hippocratic Oath does not occur in its guidelines, but rather, in its symbolism of the ideal: the selfless dedication to the preservation of human life, as stated by the University of Ottawa. The Hippocratic Oath has influenced the establishment of many ethical codes over the centuries. The Hippocratic Oath is an ethical code for doctors dating back to ancient Greece; it is unclear if he created the oath himself, but the oath was thought to be modeled and created after the beliefs of Hippocrates, the father of medicine.

The hippocratic oath is the oath taken by physicians once they have completed their four years of medical school. The oath is a covenant that new physicians take promising that they will do not permanent harm to their patients. I do not believe that the classical interpretation of this oath is a very relevant code anymore because of the technological advances and social changes that have taken place since the original writing of the oath. For starters if we analyze the classical oath we see that in the first paragraph the speaker is swearing the greek gods that they are witness to this covenant.

The modern version used for this essay was written by Louis Lasagna, in 1964, he was the Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University, till date it is used by many medical schools. Most physician saw the classical oath to be inadequate to address the current medical world that has changed to a larger population, better technology and medical appliances, political and social changes. In ancient Greek era, swearing to the gods was appropriate for Hippocrates and other physicians. Today, many people practice different religion and would prefer to swear by the God known rather than Apollo and Hygieia. The modern version omits swearing in the name of any god but uses the general word

The essay will discuss the ETHICS IN MEDICINE : The Relationship Between Law and Medical Ethics: