Developing Countries Mega Events

It is evident that hosting the Olympics games is no walk in the park. The countries trusted with this task have to spend billions to make the games a reality. Some people believe that the countries, even after spending billions of dollars benefit from the games, while others believe that the money can be spent elsewhere more efficiently. To reach a conclusion, one must study all of the different impacts in all of the different sectors the games have.

There are direct impacts to the environment for every sport event that happened, be it small scale or global. Mega –sport events are progressing every now and then since they are stimulators of major programs of improvement and regeneration for means of expressing the personality and enhancing the status of cities that are holding these events. Mega-sport events are then catalysts of development and change of the venues both in the local and national level (James and Dodours,

There are many factors in every country that transform the impact of the Olympic Games, but in general, the economic costs outweigh the benefits, while the social impacts are mostly positive. As such, countries in general should not host the Olympic Games for their own national interest, but they should first understand the impacts of the Olympics in relation to their own country before making a final

Former IOC president Avery Brundage aimed to “separate sport from politics”. Sadly it seems that countries will aim to use their teams as a tool, rather than an example of what they can achieve. This inability to separate sports from politics can be traced back over almost the entire history of the Olympic Games. However, this may be true, but there is a good side to this as well, mainly the countries involved can get lots of support from political and none political sources.

I have chosen these cities due to the ministries that already exist. Having these connections will give me a basis on where there is need and also a connection to the people. Working one on one is important to these events and this would be easier if we had connections to the leaders and even some of the citizens.

An entertainment or sports event, such as the MLB World Series, has a direct economic impact on the city that hosts the event because the city that hosts events such as these has to go through a series of new expenses and spending in order to be prepared for tourists. For instance, if a city is hosting the MLB World Series, the city is expected to have people from other cities, or even other countries looking for a place to stay during that given period of time. Therefore, companies such as hotels have to undergo a certain amount of spending to make sure that they have enough resources to meet the needs of these tourists. Another example, is that when an event such as the Super Bowl in the NFL occurs in a city, there are certain requirements

The sporting mega events that were chosen for our analysis was the Summer and Winter Olympics, the World Cup and the Commonwealth Games. These 3 events are the largest mega events in the world, and are excellent representations of sporting mega events as a whole. We wanted to go as far back as our data indexes allowed us to go, which was the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, so we made that our starting point. Our goal was to look at all of the bids made for the mega events, and look at a selection of variables influence on their chances of winning. We used data from the year the countries hosted the events (excluding the data used for future events) in order to go as far back as the indexes would allow us.

In order to avoid the venues underutilized, which should be more commercial development, such as hotel, exhibitions, conferences, office and other functions, enhance the value of the venues. To build more temporary venues before the Olympic Games, it can be removed after the game. Many sites should be reserved for large-scale commercial services, rather than just been sport game grounds. Finally, the host city should pay

Jasthi, helps the reader understand the negative financial outcomes of hosting a sporting event like the World Cup and what it does to the country’s economic status. Jasthi’s point is simple yet informative. He compares the spending from South Africa’s World Cup to Brazil’s World Cup. Jasthi argues that Brazil’s lack of budgeting led them spend three times more of what South Africa paid for in the 2010 World Cup. However, that was not the only concern that Jasthi discussed in the article. The other downfall of this spending was that Brazil invested too much money in rebuilding stadiums that were going to be used for a maximum of four games, and were never going to be re-visited after the world cup. Jasthi’s points were quick and concise to the reader, and helps the reader understand how the games can negatively effect the country if the country does not make smart financial

London was placed on the shortlist for the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics host city back in May 2004. The International Olympics Committee (IOC) eventually announced that London had been successful in July 2005 following a large campaign backing the bid. The bid for the games was led by London 2012; ‘a multi-agency stakeholder group, setting the vision and strategic direction for the games’ (Department of Culture, Media and Sport 2012).

Countries usually go all out in preparing for the Olympics, like Rio de Janeiro, who spent $20 billion. Rio spent those billions on three stadiums, loads of transportation systems, and housing such as hotels and apartments. Brazil took on debt for most of this thinking that there would

After the 1984 Los Angeles Games showed for the first time that mega-events could produce an economic surplus, mega-sport events, particularly the Olympic Games, acquired central status for city and national government development agendas (Andranovich, Burbank and Heying, 2001). And the appeal of hosting a mega-event, or more specifically a mega-sport event, has grown significantly over the

The legacy of the 2012 London Olympic Games left a lasting impression on the world stage. After all, the opening and closing ceremonies, and the games themselves were an unforgettable experience for millions of people across the globe. However, it was the host city and the British Isles that truly benefited from this monumental event.

Table 12 shows a model summary of the logistic regression. This summary determines how much of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the variance in the independent variables. Based on the Nagelkerke R Square value of 0.405, it can be assumed that 40.5% of the variance in the outcome of mega event bidding can be explained by the variance in the independent variables we chose to study. This number is lower than ideal for any regression, but is expected due to the human error in an arbitrary decision process surrounding who is chosen to host a mega event. Other variables that are unable to be quantified or are not publicly disclosed such as the effectiveness of a bidding countries’ persuasion of the IOC or FIFA, or the personal relationships members of the governing

Developing nations are filled with hope and aspirations of one day becoming a wealthy, dominating, and influential country. These nations can sometimes be unsafe, difficult to live in, and hard for workers to earn good compensation for their labor. On the other hand, living in a developed nation has many upsides. Developed nations are wealthy, which in turn have good infrastructure, labor and worker laws, and have less crime.