How Did Andrew Jackson Dbq

The Bank War was the name given to the campaign begun by President Andrew Jackson in 1833 to destroy the Second Bank of the United States. The Second Bank had been established in 1816, as a successor to the First Bank of the United States, whose charter had been permitted to expire in 1811. In the veto message, President Jackson eagerly rejects a bill that leased the Bank of the United States. He argues that the Bank gives privilege and unfair advantage to a wealthy few at the expense of the public, and he opposes foreign ownership of Bank stock. The President claims the same right to interpret the Constitution as Congress and the Supreme Court when he questions the constitutionality of the Bank. The bank’s charter was unfair, Jackson argued in his veto message, that the bank was given significantly to much market power, specifically in the markets that moved financial properties from place to place in the country and into and out of additional nations. That market power enlarged the bank’s revenues and consequently its stock price, “which operated as a gratuity of many millions of dollars to the stockholders,”. Jackson proposed that it would be reasonable to the majority of

President Jackson acted undemocratically because of his actions against the national bank. On July 10th, 1832, Jackson sent a bank veto message to congress. The message was sent to remove the US National Bank because it was only helpful for a wealthier class for things like investments. Citizens from wealthier classes were outraged by Jackson’s actions. Former senator Daniel Webster replied to Jackson message saying, “It manifestly seeks to

Jackson was not a “president of the people.” He was hypocritical in the promises he kept for the people, when he created the “Jacksonian Democracy”. He also created the “spoils system,” and he was cruel to the Cherokee, and all other Native American tribes. However, some may say that he was a good president simply because he claimed himself to be a president of the people.

It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he owned a lot of slaves. Document 7 shows that he owned a lot of slaves. In between the years 1794 and 1830 he owned slaves. But his numbers were the biggest in between 1829 and 1837. But he was the President in 1829. That shows he got more slaves when he was president. That means when he should have been doing stuff for our country he was getting more slaves to do work for him. Mr. Moore taught us Andrew Jackson owned over 300 slaves. That shows he acted like a king because he had people to work for him. He did not need slaves, he should have been focused on what was going on in our country and try to help it.

Andrew Jackson left a permanent impact on American politics, and the period under Andrew Jackson’s presidency was largely advocated democracy, but there were some evidence that showed that this era was not entirely democratic. Since Andrew Jackson was the leader of the Democratic Party, he did a lot to promote democracy. The initial democracy in America only granted white, male landowners the right to vote, which is totally unfair, however, after 1820s, state legislatures started to eliminate the property qualification of voting, which probably helped Jackson get elected. Moreover, Jackson ran the champion as a common man since he had little education and he was the archetypal self-made man.

After being warned about his “criminal tendencies”, Jackson refused to listen and hired Swartwout because he was an early supporter. Rather than appointing someone worthy of the job, Jackson gave it to Swartwout because he was a supporter, this was selfish and unfair to worthy candidates for the job. “ No one man has any more… right to(government jobs) than another”(Jackson). This quote from Andrew Jackson shows that he preached equality instead he used government power selfishly. Furthermore, Andrew Jackson closed the second national bank because it was owned by the richest class. He did this in hopes to inflame the poor against the rich. This unreasonably attacks the richest class of men. Closing the bank, made it hard for those people who relied on the bank to support their

One piece of evidence is a quote from the passage, “The present bank of the United States… enjoys an exclusive privilege of banking… almost a monopoly of foreign and domestic change.”(Document 4) This quote is important to answering the question because with this quote, Jackson vetoed the bank making it more democratic and able to use for everyone no matter what money class they were in. Another piece of evidence from Document 4 is another quote which states, “It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes.” This quote is important because it shows Jackson wants the common people to have more power, unlike the wealthy who have always had more freedom. Jackson is presented as more democratic in Document 4 by his belief that the bank does not accurately describe or represent the American

From poverty to presidency, Andrew Jackson became one of the most controversial figures of early American politics. Jackson was born on March 15th, 1767 to two poor Irish immigrants. He rose to fame at the Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812. Then, he became a rising politician, despite having no formal schooling. He was an Indian fighter who adopted two Native American boys, but also a champion of the people. He was a notorious gambler, but also a celebrated war hero. Was Andrew Jackson a democrat who pursued political and social equality, or was he a tyrant who used his power unjustly? Jackson was a democratic supporter of the people because he was a supporter of the common man, he cared about complying with the Constitution, and he did what he thought the people would agree with.

Have you ever thought about what if one of the most influential presidents of the United States was taken off of currency because of controversial topics? This is the dilemma facing the government as they choose to take Andrew Jackson off of the $20 bill. Though Jackson was revolutionary in politics and ideas, that’s not necessarily a good thing. Andrew Jackson became president in the election of 1828. Jackson started the spoils system and he relied on the help of trusted friends rather than the presidential cabinet. He started the mass removal of Native Americans and despised the banking system. Andrew Jackson should not stay on the $20 bill because though he did a lot of good, his bad outweighs it. Andrew Jackson handled the “Nullification

The Bank wasn’t sensible, however, for Westerners, who had borrowed a bunch of cash from the bank, within the late decade, were feeling the crunch of leveling-off land costs. As a result of the Bank of the United Sates not bringing benefit to Jackson, he later vetoed the bill for reassessment of the Bank, proclaiming that was within the "hands of a number of men feckless to the folks"(The common individual who lived). Philosophers such as Daniel Webster saw right through this exploitation of conflicts. Webster's statement in Document C diminishes Jackson for turning a political conflict into an emotional one. Still, Jackson claimed to be protecting the rights of the people, instead of the interests of Western speculators.

One of the beliefs of the Jacksonian Democrats was that a “common man” president would benefit the people and satisfy their needs. However, issues such as working hours, poverty, and interstate conflicts were buried beneath the surface and troubling Americans. In George Henry Evans’ “The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence”, it is explained how the working man has endured hardships that are violating their rights as citizens of the United States (Document A). As a worker himself receiving low wages for long hours, Evans pointedly uses excerpts from Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” to compare how the workers’ lives under Andrew Jackson are similar to that of the colonists in the 1700s. By mostly addressing those who have the authority to change the rules and regulation, Evans is attempting to get his and other workers’ conditions improved. It is clear

President Andrew Jackson acted more like a president of the common man rather than a king. First reason being, Jackson opposed the American System because it gave few citizens privilege/benefit. Jackson was also concerned for the United States overall during the Nullification Crisis occurred (thought it was end of US). Lastly, President Andrew Jackson picked his own cabinet members, who were his friends and common men.

Andrew Jackson was different that the presidents before him in several ways. From the beginning, he was never really involved politics but he was really well known as a war hero and used that to his advantage after one of the other candidates withdrew and another became disabled due to a stoke. Still, Jackson loses this election to John Quincey Adams in 1824, but in the following election in 1828 Jackson’s campaign uses Adams mistakes and weaknesses as an advancement toward getting into office. The Democrat party was founded during Jacksons campaign as a way to share and advocate his beliefs and, “the fact that the Democratic Party was founded to promote the cause of a particular presidential candidate revealed a central characteristic of the emerging two-party system.” Not only was a political group establishing around his ideas to build him up, campaigning was beginning to change in his favor as well. Campaigns became a lot more for the public. There were events like picnics or

This was highly due to his own person experience with the banking system when in lost a fortune in the Panic of 1819 after investing heavily in state banks. This negative personal experience with banks, coupled with Jackson’s feud/hatred of the Second Bank’s President, Nicholas Biddle, Jackson came into his presidency with a vow to destroy not only Biddle, but the Second Bank of the United States as well; not because the bank was not fulfilling its purpose of regulating and stabilizing the economy, but merely because Jackson knew he could, and wanted to prove to Biddle and the other wealthy elites that he had the power to do so. The banking issue then, which was always about too much federal power and opportunities for corruption, became one less rooted in ideals of republicanism versus federal power and corruption, and more of a personal one between a poor, hardworking, self-made “worked hard to achieve success” man versus a rich and elite man from a high class family and

In Jackson’s quest for control solely by the people, he targeted the national bank. He believed that, “ great evils to our country… might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people (Doc F).” Basically, he felt that the bank should not have such control that it can swing government legislature to benefit it’s shareholders. Jackson waged a war on the bank and as a result pushed the country into a recession that would affect the economy for decades to