How Did Malcolm X Assassination Unjust

Dr. King and Malcolm X strived to achieve equality for blacks under the law, more specifically, voting rights, desegregation, and more representation in government and politics. However, both men differed immensely in their tactics and strategies. For Dr. King, the negotiations could be brought about by the persistence of a nonviolent plan where, the oppressed people’s determination would overcome the will of the oppressor in the hearts and minds of the nation. He firmly believed in the principles of Mahatma Gandhi’s method of nonviolence resistance, which had been successful in driving the British out of India. For example, according to King, one of the resisters, or black mans goals is not to humiliate the opponent, (the white man) but to win his friendship and understanding. Dr. King proposed a passive resistance, based on “the conviction that the universe is on the side of justice” (“Pilgrimage to Non Violence” King, 112). He claimed the center of nonviolence is based on the principle of love, or understanding. Dr. King emphasized that the white man should not be held responsible for the minorities and blacks being oppressed. Here is where the two leaders oppose each other. Malcolm X felt social injustice and racism had endured too long, and it was

My next point is that Malcolm X was was a man who quickly resorted to violence and considered it a necessary factor for the the rise of African American’s in the US. he was an advocate for violence in place of peaceful protest, not simply as a last resort. Some evidence of this came along in his famous “The Ballot Or The Bullet Speech”. This is a quote directly from the written form of this speech. “Whenever you demonstrate against segregation, whether it is segregated education, segregated housing, or anything else, the law is on your side, and anyone who stands in

Throughout history there are many great people who dedicated their life to the advancement of the African American race. Few of these people created as much controversy during the 1960’s then the man who would be known as Malcolm X. Unlike many of the civil rights leaders of the time who promoted non violence, Malcolm X believed in the use of aggressive tactics in his battle for equality.

Unlike King, Malcolm X encouraged his followers to rebel against whites. Malcolm X, for the most part, believed that non-violence and integration was a trick by the whites to keep African Americans oppressed. “Don’t you run around here trying to make friends with somebody who’s depriving you of your rights” (X 1964). He was furious at white racism and encouraged his followers through his speeches to rise up and protest against their white enemies. “They’re not your friends, no, they are your enemy. Treat them like that and fight them”(X 1964). He encouraged African Americans to stand up against the white America that oppressed them.

Malcolm X was one of the primary religious leaders and reformers of the 1960, where he fought for and ultimately gave his life for racial equality in the United States. His father was a reverend who believed in self-determination and worked for the unity of black people. Throughout Malcolm’s life he was treated horribly by white people, hence shaping his misconceptions of all white people and developing his strong belief in black separatism. It wasn’t until years later where he embraced his black identity and discovered all races could live and work together for a common goal, brotherhood.

     Being an African American in the United States during the civil rights movement was one of toughest times to live through. The African American felt as if they were treated as non-humans being sent to the United States as slaves, being deprived of their education, forced to live in separate segregated areas, and given the careers that were the lowest paying jobs. They also had no political rights or legal protection. After the North had fought for the African American population to gain freedom from slavery, they were abandoned and were forced to fight for themselves. The Blacks were then left with much ambivalence in regard on how they would go about achieving civil rights. During this time was

Assassination is the murder of an important person in a surprise attack for political or religious reasons. On February 21, 1965 in New York city Malcolm X was shot and killed by Talmadge X Hayer. Malcolm X’s Bizarre assassination was unjustified because he was killed for how he was fighting for black unity and equality; on the other hand, there were many muslims who felt as if his actions were wrong and had to much power.

Do you think the assassination was justified? The person that I am writing my assassination paper on is Malcom X. Malcom X was born May 19, 1925. He was assassinated February 21, 1965. When Malcom X was speaking to the crowd, he was shot several times.

Of islam member. The assassination of malcolm x was unjust because he was a human rights

He believed that black people had been victimized enough and did not want the right to sit beside the people who hurt him and black people for over 400 years. He wanted equality “ we declare our right on this earth to be a human being to be respected as a human being, to be given the rights of a human being in this society, on this earth, in this day, which we intend to bring into existence by any means necessary” as stated in this powerful quote. Malcolm openly rejected integration, he believed society was corrupt and the only way to be saved from it was by separation

Martin Luther King Jr. (MLK) and Malcolm Little (X) were both brilliant men who fought for the same idea but composed different ways to solve it. Martin Luther King believed in Gandhian Philosophy, originated by its composer Mohandas Gandhi, which introduced nonviolent resistance to MLK. Martin Luther King sought to “reconcile the truth of two opposites...”(Stride Toward Freedom p302) one being acquiescence which makes the oppressed, continue to be oppressed. The other being violence, which relieves the problem, only for a moment. Malcolm X says he doesn't disagree, neither agree with MLK’s statement, he implies that he is with violent resistance. Malcolm X’s method of dealing with oppression by the whites is a more efficient method then standing around and essentially doing nothing about it.

Malcolm X was a civil rights activist. He wanted equality for all people and fought for it. Malcolm said that he “ identified whites as the enemy of blacks”( gale students resources 1).He believed this because blacks were treated harshly by whites and they were made into slaves. Malcolm felt so strong about black rights. He even changed his last name to x. He did it for the black heritage that was taken

Nevertheless, Malcolm X 's approach to manage social equity/consistency was to an incredible degree remarkable. He was suspicious of whites, willing to use "by any strategies key" to finish correspondence. He was a segregationist until the point that the moment that he went to Mecca. The mutual trademark that they both offer is that they both required equal rights for African Americans they just went down different approaches to get those rights.

Many years after blacks had received citizenship and the right to vote there was still much bias against them. Because of their skin color African Americans hadn’t been treated fairly and did not have the same rights as whites. In the 1950’s the Blacks stood up and fought hard for there rights and against the unfair social system that had formed. The civil rights movement, had many protests against segregation and discrimination towards African Americans. Many different leaders help unite the blacks and gain equality. Among those were two of the most prominent and influential men throughout the movement, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Junior. Both men preached about Black strength and power during a time filled with hatred and inequality. Even though both men were very influential and had the same goals of equality their strategies differed in many ways. Although Malcolm X’s strategies do whatever needs to be done to achieve equality which included violence was very influential and persuasive Martin Luther King Jr.’s tactic of nonviolence impacted many more people and became a more well known and impactful leader.

Malcolm spent much of his short life advocating for human rights for everyone. He was largely famous for his speeches, books, and his overall thoughts on human rights. Malcolm’s main philosophy was that although the civil movement was trying to be non-violent, blacks should do whatever they could against the whites if they became violent. This should be a key into what he would think about the matter of what makes humans human. People have rights and they should be respected. If the rights are not taken seriously or someone threatens them, then they should do whatever they can to defend their rights. This goes back to another point, which is that we only have the rights that we can actually defend. If you cannot defend your rights, you don’t have them at