How Did Rome Lessen The Use Of Technology Dbq

While looking at Document two, there were no stela to be found. Non-elites still had some power in the social status. They could accumulate money and trade with one another. In document two, a woman who was a slave became free. It was said that if the woman, obtained a child. The child will accumulate the wealth of that woman. This was good, because non-elites with freedom could pass on their inheritance. This was a convenient situation for their child to surpass, learn and work in the government. A barrier for slavery and freedom kept certain people from being able to qualify for higher status, unless they had the right opportunity. Additional information that historical researchers might need are more evidence towards everyday normal lives of non-elites. More documentation and Stela’s are needed for further

Allison Sawey Ms. Rodriguez WHAP 6th Oct. 30th 2014 DBQ Essay In the Classical Era, 600 B.C.E to 600 C.E, the Han and Roman empires thrived in technology. The advancement in technology gave an opportunity for mixed opinions and attitudes throughout both empires. Although technology was viewed as most beneficial to the working class and more advanced than in previous eras, the governments of these societies played a negative role in the advertisement of technology. Overall, both Han China and the Roman Empire viewed technology as most beneficial to the working class.

The two empires established their own network of roads that assisted in commerce and the transportation of military troops. These roads were able to establish a cultural unification for their broad areas of land. In addition,both were able to create new materials that benefited the economy. Han China was able to produce paper made from bamboo stalks. This ( insert some way this benefitted ). The Romans manufactured concrete made from lime powder, sand and water. This invention led to the construction of large domed interior spaces- an advancement compared to the architecture in other regions. These empires also created structures that harnessed a power source to replace manual labor. Han China invented the windmill, which harnessed the power and flow of water in order to crush grain. Rome developed aqueducts- conduits that used gravity to transport water with ease. Both empires were filled with skilled engineers or innovative citizens. The large territory and prosperous condition led to the stimulation and encouragement of new ideas and inventions to improve their

The advancements in technology led to an easier everyday life. One example is the toaster. You don’t think about it much, pop in some bread, pop it out, done! Yet, back in the day you would have to hold bread over a fire a kitchen grill; therefore, making it so you can have toast wherever you have electricity. Another example would be cars. Imagine life without cars, having to walk everywhere, bike everywhere, or find some other way to get from point A to point B. It provided an easy and fast mode of transportation. With the Ford Model T and its amazingly low price made use of automobiles widely available; in fact, the amount of cars owned from 1900 to 1920 jumped

The working conditions in factories were so bad during this time that it often led to sickness, injuries and death. People who worked in mines had to face many dangerous disadvantages every day. The working conditions in mines were very unsafe,

The Roman’s view of technology is more pessimistic than the Hans. Their attitude shows very little concern to how the common people benefit from the invention of technologies. Especially, Cicero refers the craftsmen as “vulgar” (Doc 2). This shows that they don’t respect any inventions whatsoever because the upper-class Roman does not care about those inventions. As long as they don’t benefit the upper class then they would think it is not necessary for the society. Seneca repeated this saying that the minds of whoever invented hammers or tongs were “not great or elevated” (Doc 5). This explains why the Romans concentrated more on mathematics and science than inventing technologies. Although Plutarch shows more appreciation towards technology than other Romans, stating that the roads were built with great pride. He said, “stones on either side of the road at lesser intervals so that it would be easier for those who had horses to mount them” (Doc 4). This does not show any benefit for the common or

Roman and Han attitudes towards technology is that it should be used for public works but they also had two different point of views on how to utilize these advancements in their society. While the Han thought that technology should better benefit the working class, the Romans held that attitude that technology shouldn’t be utilized at all for labor.

During the early times of civilization, Han China and the Romans relied on technology to build their mighty civilization. In a result to the new technological advances. The early Han and Roman civilizations looked at technology based on different standpoints: practicality for certain classes, efficiency and opinions on the actual users of the technologies.

Documents that would help to further my analysis of these subjects would be a document from a Han and Roman common-person on the benefits of technology. This would help me to better understand the effects of technology on their lives, and how it has helped society. It would also help to show the usefulness of their technology.

Thanks to the Industrial Revolution life was made easier for generations in the future, the revolution made inventions such as the Steam Engine, Cotton Gin, Telegraph, and the Sewing Machine; all the begging of products we use all the time in the 21st century. In Document 5: The Working man's Companion it states “conveniences

Resources abundance provided an encouragement to explore the possibilities of new technological. This would result in members of the society to purchase other goods and services provided by the American system of manufactures. “The downside to the large amount of natural resources was that the machines used were very wasteful” (Rosenberg, 109). They also realized that there was a lot of available farmland which they can build the use of manufacturing innovations. For example, steel plough which is a cultivator which replaced the hand handling in the fields.

The Incas used the road system for a range of purposes. Not only did the road provide transportation for people who were traveling through the empire, the road also provided numerous military and religious purposes for the Incas. The roads were typically paved with stone. Stone steps

Using the term road is perhaps a bit of an overstatement, typically the “road” was little more than a “well-beaten path” and they “generally were narrow, ranging from three to fifty-two feet wide” at any given point (Price and Feinman 2013:409). These roads also covered vastly different terrain, roads were present at both the top of the Andes Mountain range, and also on the coast of what is now Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina (Karam 2001). It is unclear whether the Inca forged every path entirely on their own, or if they simply acquired them through conquest of other natives. According to (Karam 2001:355-357) one thing is certain however, and that is that the Inca were the ones to “assemble the roads into a single network and subsequently maintained them.” The Tampu were perhaps the most important administrative institution created by the Inca alone and they would certainly be considered innovative by any European society of the same era. Not only did they serve practical purposes for government functions, but they were also symbolic of Inca dominance in the region. Tampu were way-stations spaced about a day’s walk between themselves and were home to storehouses, barracks, and official government records. Inca subject populations located nearest to a Tampu were responsible for keeping it stocked with food so that royal

They built great roads that were all connected and some are even still being walked on. All

All my sources agree that most inventions from the Medieval world are still in use today. Modern day inventions are objects developed from the Medieval times. The authors of “Roman Inventions,” and “Innovations That Were Built In Ancient Rome,” agree Roman inventions had a positive effect. The author of “Roman Inventions,” thought that the paved roads had the greatest effect on society. While the author from “Innovations That Were Built In Rome,” believed that the invention of surgical tools had the most benefit on the people