preview

How Differentiation Is A Risk Of Being Too General Or Give Up Detailed Definitions?

Decent Essays

When defining differentiation, there is a risk of being too general or give up detailed definitions. Although, as (Stradling and Saunders (1991) suggest, one persistent feature identified by analysts is a contrast between those who view differentiation between groups and individuals (Stradling and Saunders 1991). The National Curriculum Council (2000) defines differentiation as "the process by which teaching methods, resources and curriculum objectives, are planned to meet the needs of individual pupils". ‘Differentiation is the process of recognising effective strategies to meet targets, with each student’, adds (Weston 1992). Visser (1993) links differentiation to the methods that teachers choose to match the individual learner’s needs, within a group situation’. These three comments focus on individual needs and also suggest the complexity of attempting to get to grips with the implications of differentiation – let alone trying to define the term. In taking a critical view, the oppositions and tensions surrounding differentiation become even trickier. Although, it can be argued that a viewpoint of differentiation that emphases primarily on individuals can possibly lead to an exclusive approach to learning and teaching. Instead of providing opportunities, this can close them down and then instead of critically examining the arrangement in place for learning, it becomes all too easy to put the blame on the learner. Petty (2010) describes differentiation as “the

Get Access