preview

Hugh Hefner: Plot Summary

Decent Essays

When a celebrity dies, it’s common to see people form various opinions about the person’s life while they were alive. This can be said about Playboy founder Hugh Hefner’s recent death. Opinions of Hefner seem to go one of two ways: the public seems to either idolize or criticize him. Even if by some chance he was still here, there’s always going to be varying opinions on him. At the end of the day, he was about the empire he created. Typically, men are the ones who idolize his lavish lifestyle of having beautiful women and lots of money. However, women think that his views on women are sexist and outdated. After all, the peak of Playboy was in the 70’s, a time when sexual revolution and feminism were at a high. Feminists and anti-feminists …show more content…

In the article, former Playboy bunny Kathryn Leigh Scott expresses that she enjoyed her job. She claims she was “earning very good money in a very safe environment”. Basically, what Scott is saying is while Playboy has a reputation for exploiting women, some people don’t realize that these women had their own opinions.
On the other hand, there’s women like Gloria Steinem, who went undercover as a bunny for an article. As a proclaimed feminist, it made sense people agreed with what she had to say. Like Scott, she had her ideas of what Playboy was about. However, Steinem chose to not respond to Hefner’s death. Is she afraid she would upset him or his family? The most likely case is that she had something negative to say.
Sometimes, people learn more about someone after they die. This definitely applies to celebrities, as secrets can resurface or truths can be told. As of right now, we haven’t found any secret Playboy articles or new exposes. As stated before, it’s clear that Hefner was about his empire. But what if it’s not for the reason we think? Was the spread of scantily clad women merely a ruse to hide something? Or was it really for the gratification of men? Obviously, we can’t ask Hefner

Get Access