Imagine a future where humans are manufactured, a future where humans are created by science, a future where humans are the new lab specimen. Human cloning is like opening Pandora's Box, unleashing a torrent of potential evils but at the same time bringing a small seed of hope. No matter how many potential medical and scientific benefits could be made possible by human cloning, it is unethical to clone humans. Before the ethics of human cloning can be discussed, the mechanics of cloning must be understood first. Cloning is the process of making an exact genetic copy of an organism by a method called nuclear transplantation which is a process of removing a nucleus (the center of a cell which contains all of the biological information) …show more content…
Human cloning is not always copying and creating a full organism; that is reproductive cloning. Cloning just an organ or tissue is called therapeutic cloning, and is a technology that is not possible yet but scientists feel that it is only a matter of time (Tierney). With that technology, many patients could be cured of previously life-long conditions such as paralysis, chronic heart attacks, and leukemia. A long-term “disease” such as infertility could be cured as well by creating a clone of the female and then transplanting that clone’s eggs into the female and then the children the couple has will be their biological children! Even amputees could have limbs regenerated in a lab and reattached (Smith). These medical advances seem like a cure-all, but they are not possible at the moment because we do not know enough about the human genome to see which genes code for certain proteins which shape the function of the cell. With our current technology, we cannot direct a cell to specialize into a kidney cell to transplant into a patient needing a new kidney. Current technology doesn’t allow for the creation of “spare parts” but it is possible to create fully functional humans (after many attempts), and then the human that was “created” could then be grown and disemboweled for “spare parts” (Dudley 30). The idea of creating a “Caliban” or a human specifically to act
Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow
The concept of human cloning is highly controversial and has many gray areas. A lot of this controversy is caused by a misunderstanding about how human cloning actually works. The main cause of the lack of knowledge and understanding about the subject of cloning is the unrealistic depiction of cloning and Hollywood cliches that are presented by popular culture. A lot of myths arise from sci-fi movies such as The Sixth Day. In this specific movie there is the classic evil sociopath scientist consolidating power and using science immorally to aid his campaign, the human body chamber/artificial fish tank womb, the carbon copy clone that has the exact same looks and memories as the original person, and a whole
People feel that human cloning is a mute debate, since the process made has not been successful. According to greengarageblog.org, “In fact, over 90% of human cloning attempts have been labeled as “failure”, which means that the human DNA is only put at risk during the process. As you can understand, human DNA can be contaminated, and the chances of success are very rare”. This means that the implications of what happens when the process goes wrong are still not understood, which is not correct and could lead to serious problems that we might not be able to
Cloning is a fairly new topic for many people. So many may ask; What is cloning? The term describes a process used to create copies of a biological organism, this copied organism is referred to as a clone. Cloning is a new pathway in scientific research, and because of this, many people decide that cloning is unethical before learning anything about it. Since cloning is a new topic of discussion it is a very objectionable to society. There are several medical plus sides to medical cloning, except the world does not trust human cloning. Medical cloning should be available to those you would like to use it.
While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be
Reprodictive Cloning is a matter of asexual reproduction meaning it will be related to you as in a new category of a human. Therapeutic Cloning is a kind of therapy for diseases.Cloning has been around for a long period of time. It first began with plants in the 1800s then it moved uo to the 1960s with small animals. The first mammal,Dolly the Sheep was cloned in 1997.Neither reproductive or therapeutic cloning should be legal. If one kind of cloning becomes legal than most likely the other kind would be too. Not everybody would benefit from it, a human embryo is a human being, and regardless of the type, when it does not work it is a loss of a human,animal,or organism.
There are a multitude of debated ethical topics, especially with the the rapid development of scientific advancements and technology. It is important to consider the philosophy of morality as scientific developments continue to evolve. The topic of human cloning is definitely one of the most fascinating, yet highly controversial topics.
Today, we live in a world where anything is possible, and I mean anything. Physicists and engineers are closer than ever before to creating the world's first hoverboard… who would have thought that we could all be cruising the streets, levitating! However, on a more serious note, scientists are in the process of creating human clones - a much debated topic. Its ever spiraling theories continue to hassle the scientists who are more than keen to find out what would happen if they were to undergo proper tests. In my opinion, human cloning takes evolution in human science to the next level and could lead to major breakthroughs in health science and could cure such diseases such as spinal disease, bone marrow cancer, heart disease and many more.
There are actually two types of cloning: reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning is making human beings asexually. In reproductive cloning, the offspring receives genetic information from one parent through a duplication process in a laboratory. DreamTech International states, "All we need is a tiny swab of cell tissue from the inside of your mouth, which is used to obtain the genetic material for producing an embryo with your DNA. If you are female, you have the option of being implanted with the embryo yourself, or hiring a surrogate birther" (2002). The reason for doing this process could be for a number of reasons: to prevent congenital disorders, to propagate the genes of someone who has had no children in the conventional manner, to have a specific type of offspring, or in the situation of not being able to reproduce sexually (Dream Technologies International, 2002). There is almost a universal agreement that cloning human beings is so unsafe and, to some, morally repugnant that it
To begin, cloning may present major health risks to the human clone itself. Firstly, cloning a human can cause horrifying birth defects in the newborn. To elaborate, Steve Connor journalist for independent newspapers
The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.
Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic
Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep. Cloning has brought up a huge controversy among the American people. There are two sides to the story. Either you agree with cloning or you don’t. The only way to help make that decision is to look at the good and bad points of cloning.
What would you say if I told you that scientists had just developed a new procedure that could lead not only to the cure for cancer, but would provide an unlimited source of organ donors and could lead to the first effective treatment of nerve damage? Now adding on to this scenario lets say that our government was taking action to ban this new procedure because of a few myths and some loud mouthed conservatives.
As the procedure stands now, the cloning of humans is immoral. The procedure used has a low success rate and disfiguration and death is not uncommon, but that is because it has only been developed to be used on animals, with which these types of losse s are far more acceptable. All reasonable scientists agree that the process should not even be attempted until the process is refined to meet acceptable success rates and that those higher success rates will be feasible in the near future.