Human Disobedience Research Paper

Disobedience is a valuable human traits because through disobedience it have bring great change in the society which have impact all people around the world. For example people who disobedience the law to bring change in their society are such as Martin Luther king, Malala yousafzai, and Mahatma gandhi. These three people had a great impact on people's lives and change the society forever by disobedience.

Disobedience is the failure or refusal to obey rules or someone in authority. Disobedience like obedience becomes a virtue. Disobedience can prove that a person can stand against what they think is wrong and what they believe. In the past, there has been people that fought for what they thought was correct and made a change in the world. Like Irish Oscar Wilde once said, “It is through disobedience that progress has been made…,” I believe only the courageous will stand for themselves and for what they believe. Just like Cesar Chavez and Martin Luther King did.

    Disobedience has proven to be necessary throughout humanity’s history, for it has brought us freedom, progress, and experience. Throughout these past centuries,  humans have rebelled against social norms and their political oppressors to obtain the freedom and equality we enjoy nowadays, leading to the idea that disobedience and rebellion are important aspects in society. This in turn has also instilled in others the idea that disobedience isn’t proper, but rather detrimental to society, forgetting that rebellions and protests also fall under this category. This, however, doesn’t change the fact that disobedience in the past has actually helped humanity, as seen during the American Revolution

Erich Fromm’s essay “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” suggests that humankind’s evolution has, and continues to rely on man’s capability to exercise disobedience. While discussing the positions of disobedience being considered a vice, and obedience being a virtue, Fromm reflects upon the history of Adam and Eve believing that “eating the forbidden fruit” was man’s first act of disobedience. This is the point that broke the bond between man and nature requiring man to be dependant upon his own powers, while rewarding him with his “complete” humanity, freedom,

If disobediance is used in very wrong or profounded way then it can be wrong to go against bc its all about your response you give to be going against and it has to be proper cause that you fell should be different.So for that trait to be useful is very much true.Like going back to martin luther king he went against the ways of the world and showed that it should be different for him and others so having that disobediance trait is what helped him acomplished what he wanted to point out in the world.Its that segregations of colors is wrong and tha all people are made eqaul.

I agree wholeheartedly with Wilde; disobedience has been the thing to keep humanity progressing. While consequences follow every action, and rebellion can cause chaos, the virtues of rebellion have been exemplified in history, deified in fiction, and called for in modern society. Historically, change has followed rebellion. America began with the rebellion against England. Throughout American History, disobedience has pushed forward progress and society as a whole.

The government sets the laws in place for us to keep the peace. This peace is what keeps the world from being in complete chaos, but is it right to blindly follow all of these laws that they put in place without cross examining the law to ensure that it is what is in the best interest of the state? It is appropriate, and the responsibility of the people, to go against the government under certain circumstances. When the government takes rights away from people, no longer has the people’s best interests in mind, or places laws or enacts changes that cause harm to or cause the people to go against their moral and/or religious beliefs are just some of the events that call for civil disobedience.

At this very moment, millions of Americans are engaging in peaceful resistance to the new Trump administration. Many more have turned to violent displays of opposition. In such a divisive time it is clear that we must all defend each other’s right to civil disobedience. William A. Haviland, author of "The Essence of Anthropology," defines civil disobedience as “the refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change.” This resistance to laws is a necessary part of any true democracy. Henry David Thoreau defends this idea when he says, “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.” As one of the first and most acclaimed advocates of civil disobedience, Henry David Thoreau hit the nail on the head. If government is behaving in an oppressive manor, then it is not only the right, but it is the duty of her citizens to oppose what is unjust. Thus, peaceful resistance to

In Eric Fromm’s article “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem”, he is stating how he believes in order to be successful in life, you need to be disobedient rather than obedient. He also is giving many examples of how disobedience has been effective in the past. I believe that he is correct in a sense but also incorrect in other ways. I personally believe that in some cases disobedience is a necessity to succeed. But I also believe that in some cases, it’s more of a burden. There are many examples that support both views. According to Fromm, people who disobey rather than obey the authority are actually helping themselves.

It was Henry David Thoreau who once said Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. In reference to civil disobedience, he was correct. In order to achieve a free society all individuals must be given the equal freedom, and opportunity to pursuit their own goals, as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others to do the same. When a law hinders this ultimate purpose, society losses the essence of freedom, and creates a type of slavery due to injustice. All people have a moral obligation end injustice, and peaceful resistance to injust laws creates a movement for change that has a positive impact on society.

For the evidence provided throughout history, it’s shown that being disobedience can create progress. But this is not shown in all instances. For myself, I was having an argument with my Mom and I was not listening to what she was saying, being disobedient., I definitely would not create progress in anything, whether it be freedom or that argument being resolved, it just does not work. Overall, when disobedience is prominent there will be change and

Eric Fromm explains that disobedience can be a psychological and moral problem. This is obvious from his article entitled ¨Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem.¨ Although Fromm declares that blind obedience will be the end of the world, Fromm subtly argues that individuals who desire, not fear, to disobey questionable commands, may save mankind. Fromm begins his article by describing how obeying is good and

Disobedience is when someone refuses to respect the order of government or power. Periodically it is best to rebel against certain authority as it will not fit the needs of the civilians or only benefit the man in power. This has been shown numerous times in history with our present being crafted by changes of government being determined or thought of the people. A abolitionist by the name of Henry David Thoreau quoted that, “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves”. Antiquity has shown that darkness would've been spread further and further if the disobedience wasn't the light that banishes it.

In 1891, Oscar Wilde claimed: “Disobedience, in the eyes of anyone who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.” He believed that without disobedience, humans never would have made progress. This statement has proven itself to be true throughout all of human history. Disobedience is a valuable characteristic for humans to have.

Is disobedience a valuable human trait that promotes social progress or is it a flaw that negatively ends in destruction? Civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws as a peaceful form of protest. Disobedience is like a cloud abundant with rain, it is always full but it saves its rain for the right time. The people are the clouds but instead of being full of water they have the human trait of disobedience and they are saving their rein for the right time to rebel or make a stand. Though some say that disobedience is a negative trait, I believe that disobedience is not a flaw if it is used in a beneficial manner. I agree that it can ultimately end in destruction, however social wreckage allows for the reconstruction of something better through the demolishment of injustices. Resistance is an innate human behavior that should be encouraged in order to make a difference while having good intentions. Furthermore, civil disobedience promotes progress as shown in todays society, literary arts, and American history.