preview

Ice Bucket Challenge By Felix Salmon

Decent Essays

Is the so called “Ice Bucket Challenge” a benefit to society or a detriment. Felix Salmon author of The Ice Bucket Challenge Isn’t Going Away, published in 2014 in the Slate, argues that the ice bucket challenge cause is of no use to the scientific community as it is taking away charitable donations that could be spent on a better cause. Salmon attempts to create a connection with the reader through his use of pathos; however, by doing so he weakens the effectiveness of ethos and logos.
In the article, Salmon begins by giving the reader an approximation of how much the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis(ALS) Ice Bucket Challenge has made in the span of a month, providing us with statistical numbers and graphs. He then questions how this money is being spent and for what exact purpose. Salmon later contributes his personal thoughts on the subject. He continues by noting many key details about how the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge is causing more harm than good, going as far as arguing against funding ALS and research for it. Salmon claims that the best solution is to fund other charities that would have a greater impact in comparison to that of ALS. In his piece, Salmon uses pathos as a means of creating an impactful …show more content…

His logos appeal is lost when he begins to cite unscholarly journals that would otherwise not have relevant information about the topic, rather than informational articles that could persuade the reader. For instance, Salmon quotes BuzzFeed which is more of an entertainment news source which causes the loss of credibility. In addition, the author forgets to describe key concepts like the Ice Bucket Challenge, which leads the article to seem confusing for those who have not heard of the viral trend. Words like “de rigueur” are left unexplained and for the reader to decipher. Such details make the article untrustworthy for the reader, making the reader question its

Get Access