Identify And Evaluate Clearwater Technologies Existing Pricing On The QTX Line

When it comes to pricing we always strived to provide one of the lowest prices in the market. We decreased product prices by $0.50 on each product each year to appeal to consumers. Since providing a low cost product was one of our strategic goals we did not stray from decreasing prices. Looking back, perhaps we shouldn’t have been so loyal to our strategy when we were unable to turn a profit. While a strategy is important to stick to, being a profitable company is the ultimate goal.

5. An analysis of the individual customer accounts suggest that TFC’s current pricing model is ineffective. They are undercharging an alarming number of their customers thereby reducing their overall profitability. Based on this information, managers will hopefully elect to implement the services based pricing model so that customers are charged based on the services they are actually consuming. Ideally, changing the current pricing model will resolve the issue of customers reducing profit by 140% and 60% (Exhibit 8, numbers 3 and 4). If there are still profit draining customers, management should revisit and assess accordingly, either further increasing fees to those customers so their contribution is positive, or perhaps dropping these customers to increase overall profitability.

Wilkerson’s competitors have cut prices on their pumps, in order to maintain market share, Wilkerson also cut the price of their pumps. This dropped Wilkerson’s GM by about 15%. At the same time, Wilkerson was able to increase the price of their flow controllers by 10% without a drop in demand.

Consumers have certain types of perceptions of price in correlation to the product quality and service; therefore, company should base their price on the customer’s perceived value (K&K). Some consumers are price sensitive, while others are quality or both. “The key to perceived-value pricing is to deliver more unique value than competitors and to demonstrate this to prospective buyers” (p.183). For example, Dish Network has introductory price for a year or two, then it bounces back to regular price. Also, the company offers different TV packages, which can be customized according to the station most watched or one can pick one of the package the company provides. I have been with Dish Network for more than 5 years and one thing that kept

Each profit center should have the right to determine it’s own pricing for it’s products.

With the entry-level cameras, our strategy was to produce them with very minimal cost to ourselves. Furthermore, by having the entry-level cameras relatively low-cost this will potentially lead to mass production, which was our intended goal for these cameras. These cameras were envisioned where any average customer could purchase it comfortably to use on a daily basis. With that being said, we figured that many other companies would attempt to tackle the same price adjustment strategy that we were operating with. We reckoned that many companies were attempting to raise their prices for entry-level cameras, having said that we altered by maintaining a fairly lower price to raise profits. Unfortunately, we realize that this isn’t working out for our company, and decided to modify the prices, however we preformed this adjustment a bit to late for any major outcomes.

All pricing decisions the team took are recorded in detail in appendix A, B and C. A summary of the same is presented in figure 1 below. Decisions were made with an informed understanding of the elasticity of demand, fleet utilisation, the gross profit, the contribution, the net profit, seasonal demand changes, the competitors pricing decisions and the context of the scenario.

A $2 increase on admission prices has the potential to increase revenues with a low risk of profit loss. A loss would only occur if the price change were to lose more than 572 visitors. An increase to $14 a ticket will bring in extra profits and still remains below the competitors and the ROM’s regular hours

Pricing is a pertinent issue in procurement and acquisition in organizations. Consumers buying the commodities of an entity should get clarity on pricing related issues. There is uncertainty in Pro

1) The price of the upgrades shouldn’t be lower than the current price of the 30 seat QTX.

A major issue is since reducing the price 20% reduces the profit margin to 15%, to maintain the same profit while reducing the price, the sales must be $28 million for this year. This is an increase of 233% in one year to justify reducing the price this much. This is a highly unlikely target.

price point than the big 3, the company saw this as the perfect strategy to penetrate the saturated

i. Why was Dakota’s existing pricing system inadequate for its current operating environment? (Hint: Consider why ABC might be a good idea)

“Ensuring the requisite skills” - disagreement on price with Sales, Design, and Development teams causes conflict and lack of collaboration;

Although consumers noticed it but decided to go along with it as far as the company does not tingles with prices.