Only have lived twenty years so far, I’ve learned that personal identity is one of the most important parts of a person. Personal identity is the basic outline of who we are and what society views us as. Sometimes society or even others around us may not like who we are or what we stand for and may try to change us. This is not our fault as the individual; society tends to dislike and fear what it doesn’t understand or what it views as different. Reading short stories such as “The Birthmark”, “A Rose for Emily”, as well as “Hills Like White Elephants” reminds me that it is essential that I not let society tell me who I am or identify me incorrectly. Even if society doesn’t accept you, you have to uphold your views of confidence and …show more content…
Eventually, her willingness to change for Aylmer, and possibly the rest of society, causes her to sacrifice a lot more than her identity. Georgiana dies from removing the birthmark on her face for Aylmer, but I still understand why she agreed to do it. Although she was under a lot of pressure from her husband, she had other choices to keep her own identity and stay happy. After Aylmer asked if she’s ever thought about having the mark removed, he rudely stated that “…this slightest possible defect, which we hesitate whether to term a defect or a beauty, shocks me” (Hawthorne 5). Yes, as I said before, Georgiana could have left Aylmer rather than sacrifice her own personal identity and life for society, but she made a choice. There were consequences to changing her authentic self and true personal identity. Another clear issue of personal identity is experienced by Emily Grierson from the short story “A Rose for Emily”. Although Miss Emily Grierson doesn’t experience problems related to her physical appearance, as did Georgiana, I believe she experiences troubles with mental health, to an extent. The short story “A Rose for Emily” spends a lot of time going back and forth, but it’s clear that after Emily’s father dies, she begins to have mental breakdowns and go slightly insane. Society, in this case, the townspeople, spend their time gossiping about Emily throughout the story it seems like. Being
Once Georgiana also begins to view her birthmark as an imperfection, just like Aylmer does, she begins to hate it and demands it be removed. “’Remove it, remove it, whatever be the cost, or we shall both go mad!’” (Hawthorne 21). Georgiana is sacrificing everything she can in order for this birthmark to be removed, even death. Aylmer warns her of the dangers of performing such a surgery but she refuses to think it over and believes she is “most fit to die” (Hawthorne 21). Of all mortals, she believes that she has reached her potential in the world and there is no more use for her on the world unless she is perfect, with no birthmark and no imperfections.
No matter how much a person desires to live according to their personal autonomy, he or she will never escape the influence of societal forces. Explicitly or subtlety, these forces shape our individuality. One intriguing manner that these societal forces manifests itself in is our name. As Ruth Graham writes, “It’s becoming increasingly clear today that names carry a wealth of information about the world around us, the family we arrived in, the moment we were born—and that they mark us as part of cultural currents bigger than we realize.” Names alone provide evidence that individuals are made by interactions with social institutions and groups. Ultimately, the inescapable nature of society’s influence demands individuals to ponder how much personal autonomy is actually autonomous and to what extent does the pursuit of personal autonomy lead to a life of emptiness and vanity.
A person’s identity is influenced by how you view yourself and how society views you. In Jonathan Lykes poem This is a Siren, and the short story The Bear that Wasn’t by Frank Tashlin, both authors shine a light on how great of an impact society can have on an individual’s identity. Society has already established different stereotypes for each individual which causes everyone to perceive others in a certain way without truly getting to know them. This can cause an individual to change the way they perceive themselves in order to be accepted by society and to fit in it’s expectations of that individual. “This thing called perception, that gives people the opportunity for acceptation, or on the flip side, to be a circle of rejection…” (Lykes 2010) Here, Lykes talks about how we perceive each other can either make us accept one another or reject one another. However, in the end, it is up to the individual to decided if they are going
In William Faulkner's A Rose For Emily there is more than enough evidence to determine that Miss Emily is mentally ill. Most of the clues and hints are subtle, but when they are all pieced together the puzzle becomes clear. Not saying it is clear as too what Miss Emily was suffering from, the only way to know that for certain would be if the author or narrator told us in the text. We can conclude, however, she was suffering from some form of mental illness. Miss Emily was seen as a recluse and odd, but what no one in the town knew was that she couldn't help it there was more going on with her then people could see.
When the world we live in is viewed from an anonymous, unbiased standpoint the individuality of ‘I’ has a tendency to diminish away and be replaced by a society of eyes. Who view one’s identity differently then what the individual can see. Life moves on whether we like it or not and how individuals view themselves verses how others perceive them can leave a lasting impression. Everyone has a unique identity and perspective of the world they live in. The way individuals see themselves may appear to be different than what others see in them because of different values, morals and characteristics that shape’s ones identity.
Stereotypes have been around since the beginning and continue to hurt the lives of certain people in society. Due to stereotypes and prejudice made by certain people, the author, Evan Hunter, successfully demonstrated through the story “On the Sidewalk Bleeding” the consequences of stereotyping. The story focuses on a sixteen year old boy named Andy, and his last moments being alive after being stabbed by a rival gang known as the Guardians. Andy was stereotyped because of his purple jacket that identified him as a member of the Royals. While he is reflecting on his life, four people come by but do not take the time to help. The drunk man
In “A Rose for Emily” William Faulkner avoids the traditional chronological order of events, and describes the details of Emily Grierson’s life in pieces. Such an approach makes readers to put these pieces together, to reveal the mysterious motives and results of Emily’s strange and ascetic behavior. According to Gregory, Faulkner uses two literary strategies that utilize time in order to produce a desired effect: flashbacks and foreshadowing. Flashbacks are used to present action that occurs before the beginning of a story; foreshadowing creates expectation for action that has not yet happened.
Personal identity is essential in the human experience. Identity is complex and can be broken down into two main groups: introspective identity, and bodily identity. Introspective identity is based off of the groups, mentalities, or beliefs that you align yourself with, and bodily identity is based off of the physical side of yourself. Whether physical or introspective, your identity impacts every action you take. Whether choices ranging from what colors you prefer to which college you want to attend are primarily based off of your introspective identity, which is a combination of both memory and consciousness, physical identity impacts how others perceive you. Consciousness is mainly the awareness of bodily identity as well as continuous introspective identify, while memory is awareness of introspective identity. These two different facets of identity are imperative in the distinction between bodily identity and introspective identity. In means of personal identity introspective identity (which is evident in memory), is essential, while bodily identity (based partially in consciousness) has less credit.
The Psychoanalytic Theory may be the most engaging ways of accessing Emily Grierson, of how mentally disturbed she turned out to be. First, we look at Emily’s issues, she showed a big amount fear of abandonment. When her father dies, she doesn’t want to let the town’s people take his body away. She kept the body long enough to where the town’s people noticed a bad smell and had to bust into her home and take the body, that’s when she lets go, at least physically speaking. Emily learned to love like her father and she demonstrates some of her father’s personality traits as she grew older.
This reveals how people's judgment and interpretation of you can alter and affect your identity greatly. Your identity is made up of different components, and if you lose one of them, your identity will forever be
Georgiana sees herself as an ordinary human being at first, as she gets to know more about her husband that’s when she sees her imperfection. She sees no flaw against her mark as for her husband he sees the contrary. He sees her as an incomplete piece from nature. Aylmer influences his wife to think that her birthmark is a mistake made by nature. The narrator states, “Still, whenever she dared to look into the mirror, there she beheld herself pale as a white rose and with the crimson birthmark stamped upon her cheek.
When first reading the short story, it is easy to assume that Georgiana is weak and cares too much about what others think of her. However, when reevaluating the reasoning behind her actions, you could also view her as devoted and strong willed. Georgiana is so thoroughly devoted to her husband that she is willing to remove a part of herself, which has been with her since birth, to make him happy. Kirsten Porter writes, "She subordinates the possibility of her own dying to the possibility that Aylmer’s love for her will die if the birthmark continues to exist on her cheek." Although you could look at this as though she does everything her husband wants and tells her to do, there are instances where she stands up to Aylmer. For example, in the laboratory Aylmer tells her to leave and go back to the boudoir he sat up for her, but Georgiana insists that she should be made aware of the draught she must drink to remove her flaw
In the short story, “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a crooked romance takes place between a scientist and his wife. The narrator tells the story of Aylmer, a brilliant scientist and philosopher, becoming obsessed with the removal of a birthmark on his wife, Georgiana. The birthmark is in the shape of a tiny hand on the cheek of her face, which symbolizes humanity in the story. If it wasn’t for the birthmark, Aylmer believes his wife would be perfect, although no one is human unless you are imperfect. This hypothesis is proven when Aylmer convinces his wife to let him remove the birthmark and her human life is taken.
Many people question themselves, what is it exactly that makes them unique? What is it that defines them as a unique person that no one in the world possesses? In philosophy, these questions do not have just one answer, and all answers are correct depending on which theory appeals most and makes sense to you. In general, there are two ways people approach this question, some say that a person’s identity is the “self” that carries all of their experiences, thoughts, memories, and consciousness (ego theorists), and some say that a person’s identity is just a bundle of experiences and events that a person has been through in their life, these people deny that the “self” exists (bundle theorists). In this paper, I will be arguing that a person’s identity is just a bundle of experiences, denying the self and the memory criterion.
“Some…memberships are more salient than others; and some may vary in salience in time and as a function of a variety of social situations” (Tajfel, 2-3) Salience of identity, in the way that we need to understand it in the case of perception and decision making, can be operationalized as the likelihood that a particular identity will be invoked within a certain situation that the individual is being faced with (Hogg, Terry, & White, 257). As mentioned previously, everyone holds various identities but salience is the process through which we subconsciously decide which we be used to base our decision making or preferences on. “The salience of a particular social identity for an individual may vary from situation to situation and indeed from