preview

In The Time Of Butterflies Analysis

Better Essays

History may define the identity of a nation, but its progress and social change makes the nation a legacy. The way society is systemized today is the result of a millennia of years of victories and failures. Social change is a blessing of humanity where the basic traits of expression, belief, greed and cruelty unite to determine the fate of society. Julia Alvarez’s In the Time of Butterflies illuminates the early to middle 20th century Dominican Republic society, where the Mirabal sisters, Dedé, Maria Teresa, Patria, and Minerva, are agitators of revolution after seeing dictator Trujillo promote injustice throughout the country. Though Maria Teresa, Patria and Minerva do not live on to see new changes in their future society, revolutionaries …show more content…

When people are against an unjust government system, they end up using their right of expression to form opinions on that situation. Freedom is a natural right where the people are free to think as they choose without fearing for their opinions. A catalyst, a stage of a revolution that causes something to occur sooner than it would have, can strongly encourage expression of new ideas. An example of a catalyst can be seen in a 1971 case where military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers, a secret study of the United States and its full involvement in the Vietnam War to the New York Times. Ellsberg was catalyzed by the Vietnam War to believe that this information should be released to the public and not be censored by President Richard Nixon. These ideas reflect similar meaning when the Mirabal sisters express their “own lines instead of just reciting things from a book. That way we could say what we wanted instead of what the censors said we could say” (Alvarez 25). Actions set by the government can provide what is needed for people to express perspectives and have opinions. Writing “lines” of opinions for the changes the sisters “want” for their society means that the …show more content…

Having connections to one another increases the desire to fight, which also increases the chances of winning a revolution. This can be seen when peasants and the Bourgeoisie of the Third Estate of France unite and break away from the Estates-General to form the National Assembly. The National Assembly would not have formed and if the peasants and the Bourgeoisie did not collaborate on their thoughts of being the least privileged amongst the other two estates. Similarly Maria Teresa, leaving her friends from prison, assures herself that “the connection will continue. It does not go away because you leave. And I begin to understand the revolution in a new way” (Alvarez 253). Being connected to peers in the same society, even with those who are not supposedly well-reputed, gives real purpose to the goals that are going to be accomplished. “Connections” are never deteriorated when they are formed. Just because one “leaves” a situation, it does not mean one leaves forever. Maria Teresa “understands the revolution in a new way” in that befriending assumed criminals in her prison cell gives her more perspective on who the revolution really is for. Even though the revolution is supposedly for everyone suffering from the government’s oppression, the revolution can delve into justice for those who really need it. In this world there is no one who is

Get Access