Incident Scenarios

On 09/11/16 at 5:57pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to 841 Crevis Lane on a possible nuisance dog; dog still at large, threat to safety. I arrived at the location and spoke to complainant John Haywood. Mr. Haywood stated that he was going to his vehicle to put his daughter car set in when the neighbor’s dog came from behind him and started growling and barking at him. Mr. Haywood ran into the garage to get away. He contacted Franklin County Animal Care and Control due to the dog being previously designated dangerous. Mr. Haywood recorded the dog loose near his vehicle. I advised Mr. Haywood if he know if the dog was still loose, Mr. Haywood was unsure. I advised him I will need to check with the dog owners to make sure the dog has return home and I will return to talk to him.

Kyser advised me that dog owner Sabrina White contacted him in regards to me impounding her dogs. Ms. White was currently in Alabama on her way home, her sister was reasonable for the dogs. It was agreed upon that Ms. White sister would take the dogs. I return to 5833 Riverton Road where I met with dog keeper Dorcas Padgett. I explained that to Ms. Padgett that we received a complainant of Pit Bull name Chica was loose. As I was unable to confined Chica back to the property, I impounded her and Terrier name Paint for not displaying a dog license. I explained to Ms. Padgett that their will be violations for both dogs. Ms. Padgett stated she would accept the violations. I asked to see Ms. Padgett identification, she complied. I issued Ms. Padgett violations for failure to license Chica and Paint. I released both dogs to Ms. Padgett. I cleared from the location at approximately

On 11/22/16, at 4:02pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to the 600 block of Bedford Ave on dog at large patrol only. I arrived in the area and saw two dogs, one a small mix breed black and white and a tan and white pit bull, in the front of 681 Bedford Ave. I exited my vehicle and slowly approached the house. I knocked on the dog. Dog owner Robin Holmes-Muhammad answered the door. I asked if the two dogs on her porch belong to her, she stated that they did. I advised Ms. Holmes-Muhammad that we received a complaint that the dogs were running loose. Ms. Holmes-Muhammad apologized and took both dogs inside the house. Ms. Holmes-Muhammad stated that the tan/white pit bull does not really belong to her it was on her front porch

On 05/29/16 at 8:00pm, I was dispatched to 2142 Balford Square East on injury-possible dangers or vicious dog and owner surrender. I arrived at the house and spoke to dog owner Delane Murrell Jr. Mr. Murrell stated that his son was standing in the kitchen when their dog came in the house from the back yard and attacked his son. Mr. Murrell wrote out a statement of facts in regards to the incident. Mr. Murrell also stated that he wanted to surrender the dog. I took pictures of the injuries to Qimari Brown. Qimari has puncture wounds to his right thigh and to the right side of back. Mr. Murrell was unable to show proof of dog license. Mr. Murrell was issued violations for failure to license and failure to control a dangerous dog. Mr.

On 01/28/18 at approximately 12:39pm, I Deputy Warden N. Christian with Franklin County Animal Care and Control (FCACC) was dispatched to the area of 3625 Shoreline Drive, on a dog at large, patrol only. I arrived on scene at approximately 1:03pm. Prior to arriving at the above location and unknown female flagged me down and stated the dog that is loose caused her dog to break loose from her chain. After speaking to the unknown female I continued to the above location, where I saw a Mastiff (Brindle) loose in that general area. I took pictures of the dog loose. I exited my vehicle and tried the approach the Mastiff but the Mastiff took off running. I following the Mastiff to 5558 Newport Court, where the Mastiff went to the back of that

Christian was dispatched to 491 Townsend Ave on a follow-up on the previous incident. I arrived at the location and spoke to Demawn L. Henry (keeper) who resided at the above stated location. Mr. Henry stated that his sister owned the two pit bulls that was involved in the incident. Due to the incident Mr. Henry sister picked the pit bulls up and took them with her. Mr. Henry was unsure what his sister did with the pit bulls. I asked to speak to Mr. Henry sister, he stated she was at work until 7pm. Mr. Henry was not taking ownership/responsibility of the pit bulls, stating that his sister just dropped the pit bulls off at his house without him knowing. I informed Mr. Henry that due to the pit bulls coming from his house that he is considered of the keeper of the pit bulls. Mr. Henry informed me that he was not, I asked Mr. Henry why didn't he contact FCACC to come pick up the pit bulls. Mr. Henry stated he was not aware the pit bulls was in or at his house. I asked to see Mr. Henry identification, he complied. I took a picture of Mr. Henry identification. I provided Mr. Henry with my contact information and request that he pass the information on to his sister to have her contact FCCACC to resolve the situation. I cleared from the location at approximately

Ms. Garcia-Gantiago stated that her son and Jacob were climbing over the fence near the dog, when Jacob was bit. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago stated that their pit bull name Macky was tied up. I explained to Ms. Garcia-Gantiago that Ms. Collins has elected to not pursue charges against her in regards to the incident. Her issues is that they still have the pit bull when they advised her that they were getting rid of it. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago stated that she was waiting for her husband to get home before they head to FCACC. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago asked if I could talk possession of Macky, I advised her if she wants to she would have to complete a owner surrender form. I explained to Ms. Garcia-Gantiago that FCACC does not adopt out dangerous dogs. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago stated she understood. I asked Ms. Garcia-Gantiago if Macky was current on dog license and vaccinations, she stated he was current on vaccinations but not on dog license. I asked Ms. Garcia-Gantiago if I could see her identification, she complied. I issued Ms. Garcia-Gantiago the following violation: Ohio Revised Code (O.R.C) 955.21 Failure to register (license) a dog. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago completed a owner surrender, Ms. Garcia-Gantiago selected euthanasia. Ms. Garcia-Gantiago with the assistant of her daughter placed Macky in my vehilce. I cleared from the location at approximately

It is estimated that nearly 100,000 people die each year from medical errors in hospitals, with an estimated cost of between $17 and $29 billion per year. Finding a solution to this crisis has become a priority for every healthcare organization, with the realization that most errors are not caused by reckless staff, but by poor systems and processes (Institute of Medicine, 2000). Consequently, healthcare has begun to look to outside organizations in order to find solutions, by examining industries that are considered highly reliable, despite operating in hazardous situations. The lessons learned by these Highly Reliable Organizations (HROs) can be used to promote safe and reliable performance, which in turn should improve patient and staff

At approximately 0134 Hours, Cortez Dispatch advised me Breback, J. called 911 and hanging up. Cortez further advised that upon call back Breback, J. advised everything was ok for the moment and hung up. Sgt. Minor and I responded back to the residence, upon arriving at the residence we walked from the roadway in the dark watching the residence. The residence had all the first floor lights on and the lights on in the upstairs bedroom. I watched the residence for any signs of Breback, C. being in the residence. The two dogs located at the residence where outside barking at me. I watch Breback, J. move from the living room to the front door of the residence calling the dogs back into the residence. I watched for a short time, I did not see anyone

On 07/19/16, Investigator Kirkwood and I responded to 3300 Bankhead in reference to Valero service station being broken into. Upon arrival contact was made with on scene deputies and information was retrieved. I then made contact with the Valero owner, Paul Davis, and a consent to search form was completed. Inv. Kirkwood then took photos of the building to include the damage to the outside of the front door. Inv. Kirkwood and I entered the front door, where several more pictures were taken. I then brought Davis to the back where his camera system is to try and retrieve the video. Inv. Kirkwood continued taking pictures of the store and damage. The video was retrieved from the security system. In the video it shows that on 07/19/16 at 3:01am

The unknown male neighbor advised me that the dogs resided at the above listed location have the ability to jump the fence, normally the owners keep the dogs inside so he was surprised that they were in the backyard. Deputy Warden M. Dembiec with the assistant of the unknown female minor to talked to her mother/keeper: Sharese Gardner. Ms Gardner was leaving work and would be home shortly. Approximately 20 minutes after arriving on scene Ms. Gardner arrived home. I explained the situation to Ms. Gardner and the reason the American Bully name Valentino was impounded. Ms. Gardner stated Valentino belonged to her brother who was unable to come home. I explained to Ms. Gardner for me to return Valentino she has to take responsibility for Valention including violations I asked Ms. Gardner if Valentino was current on dog license and vaccinations she was unsure and contacted her brother via cell phone. Ms. Gardner brother was unable to provide Ms. Gardner the necessary information to show proof of dog license and vaccinations. I asked to see Ms. Gardner identification, she complied. I issued Ms. Gardner the following violations: failure to license, failure to vaccinate and failure to control. I released Valentino to Ms. Gardner. I cleared from the location at approximately

On 05/23/16 at 4:20pm, I was patrolling the 2700 block of Sullivant Ave, when I saw a medium black mix breed running loose. I turned around and parked my van. I approached 2738 Sullivant Ave to try and capture the dog when dog owner John Canterbury came out of the house and stated that he got the dog back inside. Mr. Canterbury was unable to show proof of a dog license and vaccinations. I issued Mr. Canterbury violations for failure to license, failure to vaccinate and failure to control.

On 04/24/16 at 6:15pm, I was dispatched to 3126 Astor Ave a dog at large, possible owner known. I arrived at the house, and saw that the side gate was open and two dogs inside the yard. As I approached the fence both dogs showed a high level of aggression. I slowly enter the yard to knock on the door. I knocked on the door a series of three times, after receiving no answer. I looked at the dogs and noticed neither dog was showing a dog license. As I approached the dogs, both dogs bark and growl at me. Both dogs proceeded to run away from me. The dogs ran around the house and out a back gate that came out into the driveway. I was able to push the dogs back into the yard. To prevent the dogs from exiting the yard again, I placed the

To get ahead of this situation the C.E.O. would have to include a local general leader; and according to Crandall “The leader must have the ability to remain calm and focused on the harassment management process while making decisions under significant pressure” (Crandall, Parnell, and Spillen. 2013 pg. 172). The C.E.O. must be able to effectively present information and respond to questions from groups of managers, customers, vendors, media, and employees. He should understand the harassment implications, including keeping a calm and safe work atmosphere. It is his responsibility to identify financial issues and provide cost effective solutions to such issues. Furthermore, I would recommend getting in front of a social media crisis. With

Regardless of how vigilant an organization is, security incidents are inevitable. To minimize the impact of a disaster, an incident-response policy is needed to outline the recovery processes to be implemented after an attack has occurred (Conklin, 516). The incident-response policy aids in establishing an incident-response team, defining when operations should be resumed, and ensuring that operations will resume.